Page 24 - Leadership Basics 10
P. 24

How Large Should the Group Be?

              Generally speaking, meetings have too many people at them. A greater degree of selectivity is needed
              if they are to become more productive. We all tend to assume that people have to be there because of
              their position or because of historical precedent. To be truly effective however we have to dispense
              with  outdated  notions  and  move  towards  practices  which  are  enabling  mechanisms ‐  to  ensure
              meetings really work.

              One of the factors which might be considered is the complexity of the task. It is likely that problems
              with  numerous  dimensions  require  the  contributions  of  a  larger  number  of  people.  Bear  in  mind
              though  that  meetings  become  more  unmanageable  as  the  number  increases,  making  the  process
              counter‐productive. Even if you do need more people to be involved, they do not necessarily have to
              be  at  every  meeting.  You  may  indeed  call  individuals  in  for  specific  items  at  scheduled  times.  This
              ensures that their time is not wasted sitting through items which are irrelevant to them, and that the
              business of the meeting is not impeded by the presence of too many people.
              Another factor is the amount of participation which is expected of members. Are some there for the
              weekly ‘bitch’ or are they in attendance to make a valuable input which could not be made in any way
              other  than  by  attendance  at  the  meeting?  Ideally,  each  person  should  have  something  to  bring,
              information or the results of tasks, and they should generally leave with specific things to do.

              Most committees have an average of eight members; this is really too large and considerably reduces
              the  effectiveness  of  the  group  in  achieving  tasks.  Different  studies  have  produced  different  'ideal'
              numbers, but there is a general level of agreement that the smaller the group, the better the quality of
              work. For us, a meeting size of five or six has generally led to effective meetings, but a lot depends not
              only on the respective contributions in terms of expertise, but also the behaviour of individuals. If the
              membership  is  much  greater,  there  is  less  participation  time,  an  increased  chance  of  conflicts  and
              subdivisions, and generally more people to listen to.


              Summary:
                  Consider inviting relevant people to the part of the meeting which concerns them.

                  Each person should generally have something to bring and leave with something to do.
                  Keep the group as small as possible.















                                                              20
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29