Q: The Institute presented a united front in appealing against the funding cuts. What were your observations of the process?
A: News of the funding cut came out shortly before the Christmas holidays in 2004. In the ensuing weeks, Institute staff and students worked together to lobby against the Government's proposal. Throughout the process, they demonstrated a passion for education and a commitment towards teacher education, which genuinely touched many Legislative Councillors as well as the general public. Even though the funding cut became a reality, both the decision makers and the public gained a fresh view of the HKIEd, our community and commitment to teacher education.

  The major repercussions of the funding cut, which was directly linked to the 15% reduction in student numbers, was the retrenchment in staff strength. It was a very difficult exercise and I am deeply grateful for the understanding and professionalism shown by the staff who left the Institute on either the Voluntary Departure or Compulsory Redundancy Scheme. With the reduction of both student and staff numbers, the Institute has focused its resources on core areas which will be critical in the long term. We are also seeking to diversify our revenues with additional measures such as the offering of more self-funded programmes. These initiatives will become a core focus, allowing us greater flexibility and enabling us to become less dependent on the University Grants Committee as our only source of funding.

Q: Can you talk about HKIEd's role in the upcoming "3-3-4" education reforms?
A: In the next few years, a central issue for the education community will be the introduction of what has become known as the "3-3-4" education reforms. If it is to be successfully implemented, we will need a system which facilitates professional teachers to upgrade their professional skills to deal with new demands in student learning and school improvement. Unlike traditional demarcations where teaching was categorised into individual subjects such as Physics, Economics and Geography, teachers will have to be flexible, with the ability to work towards subject integration to offer new subjects such as Liberal Studies and Career Oriented Studies. They will also need to adopt new school based assessment systems. Anticipating these developments, during the year we developed new programmes to support these requirements.

An important development with these education reforms is that Hong Kong is moving away from a relatively elitist secondary school system, where only the best students are selected to receive senior secondary education, towards a system which will cover all eligible teenagers. Effectively, the school leaving age will be raised and teachers will face a more diverse profile of students, with very different levels of abilities, motivations and aspirations. Teachers in turn will need to develop a range of skills to support this change.

At HKIEd, we are working in partnership with schools to help all teachers, be they novice or experienced educators, to develop and update their knowledge and skills to support these improvements in schooling.

Q: The theme of the Annual Report this year is "What Makes Us Special?" Can you highlight the attributes which, in your view, make HKIEd distinctive?
A: The most distinctive feature of HKIEd is a very positive legacy of our College days and that is the care and support our staff give to our students. At the same time, we add significant value to our students' knowledge, skills and attitudes. Our students, and in particular those who have previously experienced alternative styles of tertiary education, cherish this fine tradition which we take great pride in.

I would sum up the key strengths of HKIEd as follows. We provide novice and serving teachers with an education that ensures our students have a thorough understanding of their subjects - to a level which allows them to teach others proficiently. They acquire the knowledge and skills to impart their knowledge to others, the ability to handle complex and unforeseen situations, and awareness of their moral obligations as professional teachers in the nurturing of Hong Kong’s future generations.

Very encouragingly schools are recognising these strengths and this is reflected in the very high levels of employment of our graduates.


Paul Morris
President