A school-based study on situational interest of investigative study in senior physics

Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. and Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94, 617–639.

Brown, D., Anne, J. C. (2009). Innovative Uses of Video Analysis. The Physics Teacher, 47, 145-150.

Bryan, J. A. (2010). Investigating the conservation of mechanical energy using video analysis: four cases. Physics Education, 45(1), 50-57.

CDC and HKEAA [Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority]. (2007). Science education key learning area: Physics Curriculum Guide (Secondary 4 – 6). Hong Kong: HKSAR Government Logistic Department.

CDC and HKEAA [Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority]. (2015). Science education key learning area: Physics Curriculum Guide (Secondary 4 – 6). Hong Kong: HKSAR Government Logistic Department.

Chi, M., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152.

Deci, E. (1992). The relation of interest to motivation of behavior: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Deci, E., Ryan, R. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Häussler, P. (1987). Measuring students’ interest in physics — design and results of a cross-sectional study in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Journal of Science Education, 9 (1), 79–92.

Häussler, P., Hoffmann L (2000). A curricular frame for physics education: development, comparison with students’ interests and impact on students’ achievement and self-concept. Science Education, 84 (6), 689–705.

Hidi, S., Renninger K A (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.

Hill, K. T., Wigfield A (1984). Test anxiety: A major educational problem and what can be done about it. Elementary School Journal, 85, 105-126.

Klein P., Gröber S., Kuhn. J. & Müller A. (2014). Video analysis of projectile motion using tablet computers as experimental tools. Physics Education, 49(1), 37-40.

Krapp, A. (1993). The construct of interest: Characteristics of individual interests and interest-related actions from the perspective of a person-object-theory (Studies in Educational Psychology). Munich: Universitat der Bundeswehr.

Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamtic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409.

Krapp, A., Hidi, S. & Renninger, K.A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J. & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 643–668.

Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V. and Uitto, A. (2005). Pupil interest in physics: a survey in Finland. NorDiNa, Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2, 72-85.

Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Uitto, A., Juuti, K. and Meisalo, V. (2008). Students’ interest and experiences in physics and chemistry related themes: Reflections based on a ROSE-survey in Finland. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 7-36.

Logan, M., Skamp, K. (2005). Students’ interest in science across the middle-school years. Teaching Science, 51(4), 8–15.

Malka, G., Shoshana, K., Judith, B., Tzila, W. (2003). Contextual Pedagogy: teachers’ journey beyond interdisciplinarly. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(1), 21-33.

Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.

Reid, N. & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitudes towards Physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 67-81.

Schiefel, U. Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schunk, D.H., Meece, J.R. & Pintrich, P.R. (2014). Interest and affect, Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications (4th Ed.), pp. 243-275, Essex: Pearson Education, Inc.

Stokking, K.M. (2000). Predicting the choice of physics in secondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1261-1283.

Swarat, S., Ortony, A. & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity Matters: Understanding Student Interest in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515-537.

Tho, S.W., Chan, K.W. & Yeung, Y.Y. (2015). Technology-Enhanced Physics Programme for Community-Based Science Learning: Innovative Design and Programme Evaluation in a Theme Park. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 580-594.

Thomas, G. and Durant J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? Scientific Literacy Papers, 1, 1-14.

Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting students’ junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 52-60.

Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E. and Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324-329.

Yeung, Y.Y., Lee, Y.C. & Lam, C.M. (2012). Curriculum reform and restructuring of senior secondary science education in Hong Kong: Teachers’ perceptions and implications. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(2), Article 11.

Yung, Benny H.W., Zhu, Y., Wong, S. L., Cheng, M.W. & Lo, F.Y. (2013). Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptions of Good Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2435-2461.

Zeidner, M. (1998). Test Anxiety: The State of the Art. New York: Plenum.