Page 11 - Mini-Module 12
P. 11

form of cognitive strategies (Morine‐Dershimer & Kent, 1999) or social
                          support  (Rasmussen,  2001)  for  students  to  anchor  learning.  These
                          scaffolds  are  temporary  supports  to  reduce  the  difficulty  of  the  task
                          while  students  acquire  the  necessary  skills  and  understanding  to
                          operate  independently.  Nonetheless,  some  empirical  studies  (e.g.
                          Myhill & Warren, 2005) reveal that this move to independent learning
                          rarely  occurs  since  scaffolding  has  been  used  as  a  device  to  enable
                          students to complete a task successfully, rather than a learning support
                          mechanism.  This  happens  when  teachers  follow  their  planned
                          objectives as a teaching agenda instead of a learning agenda, rush to
                          cover the curriculum content in a lesson, and thus insensitive to the
                          needs and responses of their students. Overwhelmed by the need to
                          get a predetermined answer, teachers then miss the opportunities to
                          gain information or clues from students about their prior knowledge or
                          understanding.   As   a   consequence,   despite   scaffolding   in   an
                          issue‐enquiry, it would be likely for tensions to emerge during teacher
                          construction of syntactic knowledge as long as learning is regarded as
                          product‐oriented rather than process‐oriented.

                          An  alternative  approach  to  enhance  students’  capabilities  for  future
                          learning  is  to  engage  students  in  more  effective  thinking  about  the
                          subject matter. For this, Joyce, Weil & Showers (1992) provide a variety
                          of  teaching  models  associated  with  varied  instructional  goals  for
                          teachers to plan or arrange instructional procedures. First, models in
                          the  Social  Family  have  won  the  esteem  of  those  who  regard
                          constructivist  learning  as  essentially  social  in  nature.  As  previously
                          mentioned,  they  support  the  notion  that  interpersonal  learning
                          environments enable students to co‐construct knowledge. Cooperative
                          learning  (Slavin,  1990),  role‐playing,  and  jurisprudential  inquiry  are
                          some of the popular instructional strategies applied by Liberal Studies
                          teachers in Hong Kong. Second, models in the Information‐Processing
                          Family  emphasize  ways  to  “improve  capabilities  for  acquiring  and
                          organizing information, identifying and solving problems, and forming





                                                             11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16