Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 9, Issue 2, Article 3 (Dec., 2008)
Shu-Nu CHANG
The learning effect of modeling ability instruction

Previous Contents Next


Appendix I: Instructional design

Time-line

Modeling group

Modeling + CA group

Control group

30 mins

Pre-test

  •  General modeling ability questionnaire
  • Concept test I
  • Context-based modeling testI

Pre-test

  • General modeling ability questionnaire
  • Concept test I
  • Context-based modeling test I

Pre-test

  • General modeling ability questionnaire
  • Concept test I
  • Context-based modeling test I

40 mins

Instruction

  • Teaching the topic of battery by ppt. + Video lab
  • Model and modeling instruction
  • Classroom discussion
  • Decide the presentation topics

Instruction

  • Teaching the topic of battery by ppt. + Video lab (*with modeling and scaffolding of CA)
  • Group discussion (why the flashlight doesn’t work?) (* with scaffolding, fading and reflection of CA)
  • Decide the presentation topics (* with exploration and reflection of CA)

Instruction

  • The topic of battery (ppt. only)
  • Classroom discussion

30 mins

Post-test

  • General modeling ability questionnaire
  • Concept test II
  • Context-based modeling test II

Post-test

  • General modeling ability questionnaire
  • Concept test II
  • Context-based modeling test II

Post-test

  • General modeling ability questionnaire
  • Concept test II
  • Context-based modeling test II

60 mins

  • Oral presentation              (10 mins/per group)
  • Oral presentation            (10 mins/per group)
  • Peer-evaluation (* with reflection of CA)

Compensatory instruction

  • Teaching the topic of battery by ppt. + Video lab
  • Students share the feedback about video and ppt. instruction

40 mins

  • Teacher gives feedback
  • Delivering the award
  • Students share feedback for each presentation
  • Delivering the award

 


Copyright (C) 2008 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 9, Issue 2, Article 3 (Dec., 2008). All Rights Reserved.