Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 8, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2007)
Mehmet KARAKAS

The influence of constructivism on nature of Science as an area of research and as a classroom subject

Previous Contents


References

American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Project 2061: Science for All  Americans. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Abd- El- Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understanding of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83-126).Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62.

Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers, (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241-247.

Cooley, W., & Klopfer, L. (1963). The evaluation of specific educational innovations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 73-80.

Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hurd, P.D. (1960). Biological education in American secondary schools, 1890-1960. Washington, DC: AIBS.

Kimball, M.E. (1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(1), 3-6.

Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. (1961). Test on understanding science. Form W. Princenton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of students understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 33-47.

Lawson, A.E. (1999). What should students learn about the nature of science and how should we teach it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 28(6), 401-411.

Lenkins, E. (1989). Why the history of science? In M. Shortland & A. Warwick (Eds.), Teaching the History of Science (pp. 19-29). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A   review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

Lederman, Abd-El-Khalick, Akerson (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.

Lederman, N.G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and source of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239.

Lederman, N.G., & Zeidler, D.L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721-734.

MacDonald, M.A., & Rogan, J.M. (1990). Innovation in Sought African science education (Part 2): Factors influencing the introduction of instructional change. Science Education, 74(1), 119.

Mackay, L.D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(1), 57-66.

McComas, W.F. (2000). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education of the 1980”s. Washington, DC: Author.

National Society for the Study of Education. (1960). Rethinking science education (59th Yearbook, Part I). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Russell, T. (1981). What history of science, how much, and why? Science Education, 65(1), 51-64.

Saunders, H.N. (1955). The teaching of general science in tropical secondary schools. London: Oxford University Press.

Solomon et al., (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409-421.

Trent, J. (1965). The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3(3), 224-229.

Welch, W.W. (1979). Twenty years of science curriculum developments: A look back. In D.C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (vol.7, pp. 282-306). Washington DC: AERA.

Wheatley, G.H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics. Science Education, 75 (1), 9-22.

Wilson, L. (1954). A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education, 3 (2), 159-164.

Zeidler, D.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1989). The effects of teachers' language on students' conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 771-783.

 


Copyright (C) 2007 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 8, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2007). All Rights Reserved.