Peer instruction in chemistry education: Assessment of students’ learning strategies, conceptual learning and problem solving

Avramiotis, S., & Tsaparlis, G. (2013). Using computer simulations in chemistry problem solving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 297-311.

Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics. London: SAGE.

Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 516-529.

Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B. E. (2000). Chemistry: The central science. 8th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B. E. (1997). Chemistry: The central science (Test item file). 7th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students’ knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 53-66.

Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, O. E., Ozkahveci, O., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 207–239.

Cartrette, D. P., & Mayo, P. M. (2011). Students ‘understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 29–39.

Cavalli, G., Hamerton, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2015). What are we going to do about a problem like polymer chemistry? Develop new methods of delivery to improve understanding of a demanding interdisciplinary topic. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 293-301.

Cook, E., Kennedy, E., & McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of teaching metacognitive learning strategies on performance in general chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 961-967.

Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2005). Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: Ability to solve novel problems. Advances in Physiology Education, 29, 107-111.

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970–977.

Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. 1st edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. 7th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 17.0 update (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Giuliodori, M. J., Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problem-solving questions. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 168-173.

Gok, T. (2012a). The impact of peer instruction on college students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 417-436.

Gok, T. (2012b). The effects of peer instruction on students’ conceptual learning and motivation. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1-17.

Gok, T. (2013). A comparison of students’ performance, skill and confidence with peer instruction and formal education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(6), 747-758.

Gok. T. (2014). Peer instruction in the physics classroom: Effects on gender difference performance, conceptual learning, and problem solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 776-788.

Gok. T. (2015). An investigation of students’ performance after peer instruction with stepwise problem-solving strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 561-582.

Gosser, D. K., Kampmeier, J. A., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2010). Peer-led team learning: 2008 James Flack Norris award address. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 374-380.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.

Kwan, Y. E., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68-79.

Lasry, N., Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066–1069.

Lewis, S. E., & Lewis, J. E. (2005). Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 135-139.

Liaw, H. L., Chiu, M. H., & Chou, C. C. (2014). Using facial recognition technology in the exploration of student responses to conceptual conflict phenomenon. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 824-834.

Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2006). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74(2), 118-122.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2010). Just in time teaching and peer instruction. In S. Scott & M. Mark (Eds.), Just in time teaching: Across the disciplines, and across the academy (pp. 39-62). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

McCreay, C. L., Golde, M. F., & Koeske, R. (2006). Peer instruction in the general chemistry laboratory: Assessment of student learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(5), 804-810.

Miller, K., Lasry, N., Lukoff, B., Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2014). Conceptual question response time in peer instruction. Physical Review Special Topic-Physics Education Research, 10(020113), 1-6.

Miller-Young, J. (2013). Using peer instruction pedagogy for teaching dynamics: Lessons learned from pre-class reading quizzes. Proceedings 2013 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA13) Conference, Montreal, QC, 1-6.

Mitra, N. K., Nagaraja, H. S., Ponnudurai, G., & Judson, J. P. (2009). The levels of difficulty and discrimination indices in type a multiple choice questions of pre-clinical semester 1 multidisciplinary summative tests. International E-Journal of Science, Medicine & Education, 3(1), 2-7.

Nagel, M. L., & Lindsey, B. A. (2015). Student use of energy concepts from physics in chemistry courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 67-81.

Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.

Nilsson, T., & Niedderer, H. (2014). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of enthalpy, enthalpy change and related concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 336-353.

Parkinson, M. (2009). The effect of peer assisted learning support (PALS) on performance in mathematics and chemistry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(4), 381-392.

Perez, K. E., Strauss, E. A., Downey, N., Galbraith, A., Jeanne, R., & Cooper, S. (2010). Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9, 133-140.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning. Michigan: School of Education Building, The University of Michigan. ERIC database number: ED338122.

Porter, L., Lee, C. B., Simon, B., & Zingaro, D. (2011). Peer instruction: Do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER 2011, Providence, RI, USA, 45-52.

Reay, N. W., Bao, L., Li, P., Warnakulasooriya, R., & Baugh, G. (2005). Toward the effective use of voting machines in physics lecture. American Journal of Physics, 73(6), 554- 558.

Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2015). Flipping the chemistry classroom with peer instruction. In J. Garcia-Martinez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practice, opportunities and trends, (pp. 319-344). Weinheim, Germany:Wiley-VCH.

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122-124.

Turpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009). Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors’ implementation of peer instruction. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(020101), 1-18.