Impact of innovative approaches in teaching –learning of science on rural students at middle school level

Brotherton, P.N., & Preece,F.W.(1995). Science process skills: their nature and interrelationship. Research in Science & technology Education, 13, 5-11.

Bruner, J.S. (1961) . The art of discovery, Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.

Chang, C.Y., & Mao, S.L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwen science students’ outcome with inquiry –group versus traditional instruction. J. Educational Research, 92, 340-346.

Exemplar problems in science for class VII. National Council of Educational research and Training, New Delhi, India, 2012.

Exemplar problems in science for class VIII. National Council of Educational research and Training, New Delhi, India, 2012.

Ginsburg Block, M.D., Rohrbeck, C.A., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (2006). A meta–analytic review of social, self-concept and behavioral outcomes of peer- assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732-749.

Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education Policy &Practice, 6, 129-145.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN, US: Interaction Book Company.

Key, C.W., & Bryan, L.A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry based science with teachers: essential research for lasting reform. J. Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631-645.

Koul, A. (2008). Evaluation in science: Quality issues. School Science - Quarterly Journal, 46(4), 17-23.

Koul, A. (2010). Formative assessment in science-an exemplar. School Science - Quarterly Journal, 48(3&4), 31-39.

Learning without burden. (1993). Report of the National Advisory committee, appointed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

Mergendoller, J.R., Maxwell, N.L. & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and students characteristics. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem –Based Learning, 1(2), 49-69.

Mioduser, D., & Betzer, N. (2003). The contribution of project – based learning to high-achievers acquisition of technological knowledge and skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 59-77.

National Curriculum Framework-2005 (NCF-2005). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

National Focus Group Position Paper on Habitat and Learning. (2005). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

National Focus Group Position Paper on Teaching of Science. (2005). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

Olson, S., & Louks-Horsley, S (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the natural science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington National Academies Press.

Ostlund, K.L. (1992). Science process skills: assessing hands-on student performance. New York: Addison-Wesley.

Source book on assessment in science classes VI-VIII. (2012). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

Textbook of Science, class VI. (2006).National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

Textbook of science, class VII. (2008). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

Textbook of science, class VIII. (2008). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India.

Turnip., & Cage, B.N. (2004). The effects of an integrated, activity-based science curriculum on student achievement, science process skills, and science attitudes. Electron. J. Literacy through Science, 3.

Walters, Y.B., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students’ performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19, 133-145.

Wilke, R.R., & Straits, W.J. (2005). Practical advice for teaching inquiry–based science process skills in biological sciences. American Biology Teacher, 67, 534-540.