Exploring the influencing factors in students’ acquisition of manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school

Abrahams, I., Reiss, M. J., & Sharpe, R. M. (2013) The assessment of practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 209-251.

Allen, M. (2012). Editorial. An international review of school science practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 1-2.

Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369- 406.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Braund, M., Crompton, Z., Driver, M., & Parvin, J. (2003) Bridging the key stage2/3 gap in science. School Science Review, 85(310), 117-123.

Buffler, A., Allie, S., & Lubben, F. (2001). The development of first year physics students’ ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1137-1155.

Campbell, B. (2001). Pupils’ perceptions of science education at primary and secondary school. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, P. Reiska (Eds.) Research in Science Education- Past, Present and Future. Netherlands: Springer. p. 125-130.

Delargey, M. J. N. (2001). How to learn science “quickly, pleasantly and thoroughly”: Comenian thoughts. School Science Review, 82(301), 79–84.

Diack, A. (2009). A smoother path: Managing the challenge of school transfer. Perspective in Education, 2, 39-51.

Fadzil, H. M. & Saat, R. M. (2013). Phenomenographic study of students manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Jurnal Teknologi, 63(2), 71-75.

Ferris, T., & Aziz, S. (2005) A psychomotor skills extension to Bloom’s taxonomy of education objectives for engineering education. Exploring Innovation in Education and Research. Tainan, Taiwan.

Galton, M. Gray, J. M., & Ruddock, J. (2003). Transfer and transitions in the middle years of schooling (7-14). Continuities and discontinuities in learning. Nottingham: DfES Publications

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

Hamza, K. M. (2013). Distractions in the school science laboratory. Research in Science Education, 43, 1477-1499.

Hawk, K., & Hill, J. (2004, April). Transition traumas, traps, turning points and triumphs: Putting student needs first. Paper presented at The Way Forward for Secondary Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

Hofstein, A., & Mamlok., R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105-107).

Howe, A. C., & Jones, L. (1993). Engaging children in science. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Hurd, P. D. (2000). Transforming middle school science education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Lightburn, M. E., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom environments and student outcomes among students using anthropometry activities in high-school science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25(2), 153-166.

Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: an analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman & S. Abel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393-441). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

Ministry of Education (2006). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools Curriculum Specifications: Science Form 1. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Ritchie, J., & Spencer, E. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Routledge.

Saat, R. M. (2010). Issues in maintaining continuity and progression of students’ science learning. In A. Hussain & N. Idris (Eds.), Dimensions of education (pp. 275-291). New Delhi, India: Gyan.

Saldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research. New York, US: Alta Mira Press.

Sorgo, A., & Spernjak, A. (2012). Practical work in Biology, Chemistry and Physics at lower secondary and general upper secondary schools in Slovenia. Eurasis Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 11-19.

Thurston, A., Christie, D., Karagiannidou, E., Murray, P. Tolmie, A., & Topping, K. (2010). Enhancing outcomes in school science for pupils during transition from elementary school using cooperative learning. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(1), 19-32.

Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W & Powell, J. C. (2000). Teaching secondary school science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Wickman, P. O., & Ostman, L. (2002). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 465-486.