 |
Asia-Pacific Forum
on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 9, Issue 1, Article 4
(June, 2008) |
Abd-el Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (10), 1057-1095.
Altiparmak, M. & Nakiboglu, M. (2002). Lise Biyoloji laboratuvarlarinda “isbirlikli ögrenme” yönteminin tutum ve basariya etkisi. Proceedings of V. National Science and Mathematics Symposium, I, 40-45.
Ardaç, D. & Mugaloglu, E. (2002). Bilimsel Süreçlerin Kazanimina Yönelik Bir Program Çalismasi. Proceedings of V. National Science and Mathematics Symposium, I, 226-231.
Baser, M. (1996). Kavram degistirme yönteminin ögrencinin isi ve sicaklik kavramlarini anlamalarina ve fen tutumlarina etkisi. Unpublished master thesis, ODTÜ, Turkey.
Çaliskan, S., Sezgin Selçuk, G. & Erol, M. (2005). Isbirlikli ögrenme yönteminin ögrencilerin fizik laboratuvar basarisi ve tutumu üzerindeki etkileri. Çagdas Egitim Dergisi, 320, 23–29.
Charles, C. M. (1998). Correlational research, Introduction to Educational Research, (3th ed.), An imprint of Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. New York.
Chen, H. (2001). Parents' attitudes and expectations regarding science education: comparisons among American, Chinese-American, and Chinese families (Statistical Data Included). Adolescence, 36(142).
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2004). Developing physics learning activities for fostering student creativity in Hong Kong context. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 5(2), Article 1. [Online] http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v5_issue2/chengmy/.
Chiang, S-H & Tang, V. (1999). An experimental study on a v-map teaching strategy of developing scientific creativity. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 7(4), 367-392.
Dass, P. M. (2004). New science coaches: preparation in the new rules of science education. The, Weld, J. (Eds.), Game of Science Education, Pearson Education, Inc. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Demirci, N. (2004). [On-line] http://w3.balikesir.edu.tr/~demirci/Attit-twrd-phy.htm.
Dhillon, A. S. (1996). Obtaining an understanding of investigative work in school science. Paper presented at the Australian Science Education Research Association Conference. Canberra, Australia: University of Canberra.
Ekiz, D. (2003). Egitimde Arastirma Yöntem ve Metotlarina Giris. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
Erdener, N. (2003). Egitimde yaratici düsünme-tasarim ve öngörü yeteneginin gelistirilmesi, [On-line] http://www.kho.edu.tr/Yayinlar/Btym/Bilgibankasi/Genelkon/114_Nusreterdener.htm
Geban, Ö. (1990) Iki farkli ögretim yönteminin lise seviyesindeki ögrencilerin Kimya basarilarina, bilimsel islem becerilerine ve Kimyaya karsi olan tutumlarina etkisi. Unpublished PhD thesis, ODTÜ, Turkey. Geban, Ö., Ertepinar, H., Sahpaz, F. & Altan, A. (1994). Bilgisayar destekli egitimin ögrencilerin fen bilgisi basarilarina ve fen bilgisine ilgilerine etkisi. Proceedings of I. National Science Education Symposium, Izmir.
Haladyna, T., & Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Attitudes toward science: a quantitative synthesis. Science Education, 66 (4), 547–563.
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6 (1), 129–140.
Hoover, S. M. & Feldhusen, J. F. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation ability of gifted ninth-grade students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (4), 838–848.
Hoover, S. M. (1994), Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth- grade students, Rooper Review, 16(3), 156–159.
Hu W. & Adey P. (2002), A scientific creativity test for secondary school students, International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403.
Huppert, J., Lomask S.M. & Lazarorcitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 803–821.
Innamorato, G. (1998). Creativity in the development of scientific giftedness: educational implications. Roeper Review, 21 (1).
Jaus, H. H. (1975). The effect of integrated science process and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 803–821.
Karasar, N. (2000). Bilimsel Arastirma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
Koray, Ö. (2003). Fen Egitiminde Yaratici Düsünmeye Dayali Ögrenmenin Ögrenme Ürünlerine Etkisi. Unpublished PhD thesis, Gazi University, Turkey.
Laius, A. & Rannikmae, M. (2005). The Influence of STL Teaching on Students’ Creative Thinking”, Cresils Contributions of Research to Enhancing Students’ Interest in Learning Science, Esera 2005, Barcelona. [On-line] http://na-serv.did.gu.se/ESERA=%/cd/esera.htm
Lee, S-J. & Lee Y-B. (2002). On scientific process skill training to primary school students’ scientific creativity. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 341–372.
Liang, Jia-Chi. (2002). Exploring scientific creativity of eleventh grade students in Taiwan, Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
Lin, C., Hu, W., Adey, P. & Shen, J., (2003). The influence of CASE on scientific creativity. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 143–162.
MNE. (2000). Ilkögretim Okulu Fen Bilgisi Dersi (4,5,6,7,8. sinif) Ögretim Programi. MEB Tebligler Dergisi, 63, 2518,
Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science suggestions for primary teachers, Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25–29.
Moravcsik, M. J. (1981). Creativity in science education. Science Education, 65(2), 221–227.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Roberts, L. (2003). Creativity, Tech Directions, 63 (3).
Saxena, S.P. (1994) Creativity and Science Education, Creativity and Science Education preservice education program project president; Khandelwal, B.P. [On-line] http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/q/6J/BJ/6JBJ0401.htm, (03.10.2006).
Sungur, N. (1988). Yaratici Sorun Çözme Programinin Etkililigi. Unpublished PhD thesis. Ankara University, Turkey.
Turpin, T. J. (2000). A study of the effects of an integrated, activity-based science curriculum on student achievement, science process skills, and science attitudes, upon the science process skills of urban elementary students. Journal of Education, 37(2),
Ünal, G. & Ergin, Ö. (2006). Bulus Yoluyla Fen Ögretiminin Ögrencilerin Akademik Basarilarina, Ögrenme Yaklasimlarina ve Tutumlarina Etkisi. Türk Fen Egitimi Dergisi, 3(1), 36–52.
