Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 8, Issue 2, Article 2 (Dec., 2007) Behiye AKCAY Effectiveness of professional development program on a teacher’s learning to teach Science as inquiry Previous Contents

REFERENCES

AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.and comments (Figure 2).

Abd Hamid, N. H. (2006). Analysis of changes in teachers concerning constructivist perceptions, philosophies, and practices resulting from the year-long Iowa Chautauqua professional development project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Science Education, Iowa City, The University of Iowa.

Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J. & Fraser, P.C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37-55.

Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What Research says about Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1): 1-12.

Berliner, D.C., (1988, February). The development of expertise in pedagogy. Paper presented at the Charles W. Hunt Memorial Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.

Burry-Stock, J.A. (1995). Expert Science Teaching Evaluation Module (ESTEEM) instruments. (1^st ed.). Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation (CREATE).

Campbell, D.T. (2004). Analysis of changes in teachers’ views on teaching and learning after participating in the year-long Iowa Chautauqua professional development program and the effects of these changes on students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Science Education, Iowa City, The University of Iowa.

Dreyfus, H.L. & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind over Machine. New York: The Free Press.

Haury, D. L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

Kleine, K., Brown, B., Harte, B., Hilson, A., Malone, D., Moller, K., Niblett, A., Toole, M., and Walker, B. (2002). Examining inquiry. Principal Leadership (Middle School Ed.), 3(3), p. 36-39.

Lawson, E. A. (2000). Managing the inquiry classroom: Problems and solutions. The American Biology Teacher, 62(9), p. 641-648.

Leonard, W. H., and Chandler, P. M. (2003). Where is the inquiry in biology textbooks? The American Biology Teacher, 65(7), p. 485-487.

Lew, L.Y. (2001). Development of constructivist behaviors among four new science teachers prepared at the University of Iowa. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Science Education, Iowa City, The University of Iowa.

National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), pp.307-332.

Taylor, P., Fraser, B., & White, L. (1994). A classroom environment questionnaire for science educators interested in the constructivist reform of school science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.