 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 8, Issue 1, Article
1 (June, 2007) Haluk ÖZMEN and Osman KENAN Determination of the Turkish primary students' views about the particulate nature of matter |
|
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 8, Issue 1, Article
1 (June, 2007) Haluk ÖZMEN and Osman KENAN Determination of the Turkish primary students' views about the particulate nature of matter |
Ayas, A. & Özmen, H. (2002). A study of students’ level of understanding of the particulate nature of matter at secondary school level. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 19, 45-60.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64-66.
BauJaoude, S. B. (1991). A study of the nature of students’ understanding about the concept of burning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 689-604.
Boz, Y. (2006). Turkish pupils’ conception of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 203-213.
Briggs, H., Brook, A. & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. CLISP: The University of Leeds.
De Jong, O, Van Driel, J. H. & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 946-964.
Gabel, D. L. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 60, 193-194.
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V. & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 695-696.
Griffiths, A. K. & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 611-628.
Hewson, P. W. & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
Holgersson, I. & Lofgren, L. (2004). A long-term study of students’ explanations of transformations of matter. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 4, 77-96.
Kokkotas, P., Koulaidis, V. & Viachos, I. (1998). Teaching the topic of the particulate nature of matter in prospective teachers training courses. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 291-303.
Krishnan, S. R. & Howe, A. C. (1994). The mole concept: Developing an instrument to assess conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 653-658.
Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D. (1993). Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249-270.
Liu, X. & Lesniak, K. (2005). Students’ progression of understanding the matter concept from elementary to high school. Science Education, 89, 433-450.
Liu, X. & Lesniak, K. (2006). Progression in children’s understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 320-346.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry? Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191-196.
Nakhleh, M. B. & Samarapungavan, A. (1999). Elementary school children’s beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 666-805.
Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A. & Saglam, Y. (2005). Middle school students’ beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 581-612.
Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85, 158-179.
Osborne, R. J. & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 825-838.
Özmen, H. (2004). Some student misconceptions in chemistry: A literature review of chemical bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 146-159.
Özmen, H. & Ayas, A. (2003). Students’ difficulties in understanding of the conservation of the matter in open and closed-system chemical reactions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4, 269-290.
Özmen, H., Ayas, A. & Coştu, B. (2002). Determination of the science student teachers’ understanding level and misunderstandings about the particulate nature of the matter. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2, 506-529.
Palmer, D. (1999). Exploring to link between students’ scientific and nonscientific conceptions. Science Education, 83, 639-653.
Pereira, M. P. & Pestana, M. E. M. (1993). Pupils’ representations of water. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 313-319.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-216.
Raviola, A. (2001). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding of solubility equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 629-631.
Snir, J., Smith, C. L. & Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with competing underlying models: A software tool for introducing students to the particulate model of matter. Science Education, 86, 694-830.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G. & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1353-1368.
Tsai, C. -C. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students’ misconceptions about the microscopic views of phase change: A study of an analogy activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 83-91.
Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 249-262.
Yilmaz, A. & Alp, E. (2006). Students’ understanding of matter: the effect of reasoning ability and grade level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6, 22-31.
Copyright (C) 2007 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 8, Issue 1, Article 1 (June, 2007). All Rights Reserved.