 |
Asia-Pacific
Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 7, Issue 2, Article 10
(Dec., 2006) Behiye AKCAY The analysis of how to improve student understanding of the nature of science: A role of teacher
|
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L, & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature ofscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.
Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on pre-service science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72(1), 73-82.
Bell, R. L, Lederman, N. G, & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: a follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581.
Bell, R., Abd-El-Khalick. F., Lederman, N. G., McComas, W. F., & Matthews, M. R. (2001). The nature of science and science education: A bibliography. Science and Education, 10, 187-204.
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher education, 41(3), 53-62.
Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 471-485.
Brown, S. and Clarke, N. (1960). International Education in Physics. Michigan: Michigan Institute of Technology.
Buss, K. A., Newman, W. J., & Martini, M. (2002). The influence of an instructor’s nature of science beliefs on science methods instruction. NARST Conference Papers: New Orleans.
Dawkins,
K. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1999). Using historical cases to change
teachers’
understandings and practices related to the nature of science. NARST
Conference
Papers: Boston.
Dickinson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F.S, & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Changing elementary teachers’ views of the NOS: Effective strategies for science methods courses. ED 441 680.
Driver, R. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham, Bristol, P.A.: Open University Press.
Duschl, R.A. (1987). Improving science teacher education programs through inclusion of history and philosophy of science. In J.P. Barufaldi (ed.), Improving Preservice/Inservice Science Teacher Education: Future Perspectives, the 1987 AETS Yearbook, Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers’ decision-making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6), 467-501.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121-133.
Gill, W. (1977). The editors page. The Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 23, 4.
Haidar, A. H. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers’ views about the nature of science. International Journal of science Education, 21(8), 807-822.
Harms, N., & Yager, R. (1981). What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol.3. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
Jones, L. S., & Beeth, M. E. (1995). Implementing conceptual change instruction: a case study of the one teacher’s experience. ED 388 499.
Kimball, M. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 675-688.
King, B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitude toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 135-141.
Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87-95.
Larson, J. O. (2000). Fostering instrumentalist conceptions of the nature of science: a classroom study. ED 439 949.
Lederman, N. G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes in students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education, 70(1), 3-19.
Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987) science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721-734.
Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225- 239.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, N, G., (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929.
MacDonald, D. (1996) making both the nature of science and science subject matter explicit intents of science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(3), 183-196.
Matthews, M.R. (1990). History, philosophy and science teaching: What can be done in an undergraduate course? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10, 93-97.
Meichtry, Y. J. (1999). The nature of science and scientific knowledge: Implications for a pre-service elementary methods course. Science and Education, 8, 273-286.
National Research Council. (1996). National science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association (1982). Science-technology-society: science education for the 1980’. Washington, DC: Author.
Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996). Probing teachers’ views of the nature of science: How should we do it and where should we be looking? In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe. London: Falmer.
Ochanji, M.K. (2003). Learning to Teach the Nature of Science: A Study of Pre-service Teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 25-32.
Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Pre-service teaches’ views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science-teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.
Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
Ramsey, G. & Howe, R.W. (1969). An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science. The Science Teacher, 36(4), 62-70.
Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 80–84.
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). It’s the nature of the beast: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236.
