Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 7, Issue 1, Foreword (June, 2006)
Norman G. LEDERMAN
Research on Nature of Science: Reflections on the Past, Anticipations of the Future
Previous Contents

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understanding of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87 (3), 352-377.

Central Association for Science and Mathematics Teachers. (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241-247.

Cobern, W. W. (2000). The Nature of Science and the Role of Knowledge and Belief. Science and Education, 9, 219-246.

Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young peoples's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6), 467-501.

Hauslein, P.L., Good, R.G., & Cummins, C.L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: From science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 939-964.

Kimball, M. E. (1967-68). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110-120.

Klopfer, L. E. (1964). The use of case histories in science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 64, 660-666.

Lederman, N.G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education, 70(1), 3-19.

Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (8), 916-929.

Lederman, N.G., & Niess, M.L. (1997). The nature of science: Naturally? School Science and Mathematics, 97(1), 1-2.

Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389-407.

National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

National Science Teachers Association. (1962). The NSTA position on curriculum development in science. The Science Teacher, 29(9), 32-37.

National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. (An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author.

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.

Scharmann, L.C., & Smith, M.U. (2001). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 85(4), 493-509.

Schwartz, R.S. (2004). Epistemological views in authentic science practice: A cross-discipline comparison of scientists' views of nature of science and scientific inquiry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

Copyright (C) 2006 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 7, Issue 1, Foreword (June, 2006). All Rights Reserved.