|
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,
Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 8 (Aug., 2004) Winnie Wing Mui SO Assessing primary science learning: beyond paper and pencil assessment
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,
Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 8 (Aug., 2004) Winnie Wing Mui SO Assessing primary science learning: beyond paper and pencil assessment
|
References
Atkinson, H. & Bannister, S. (1998). Concept maps and annotated drawings, Primary Science Review, 51, 3-5.
Bell, B. and Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher Development: A Model from Science Education. London: Falmer Press.
Bell, B. (2000) Formative assessment and science education: a model and theorizing. In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds) Improving Science Education: the Contribution of Research, 48-61. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Biggs, J. (1995). Assessment of learning. In J. Biggs & D. Watkins (Eds) Classroom Learning: Educational Psychology for the Asian Teacher. 167-194. Singapore: Prentice.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, (80)2, 139-148.
Black, P. (2000). Policy, practice and research: the case of testing and assessment. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Ed.) Improving Science Education: the Contribution of Research, 327-346. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Buck, G. A. (2000). Teaching science to English-as-second-language learners, Science and Children, (38)3, 38-41.
Comber, M. & Johnson, P. (1995). Pushes and pulls: the potential of concept mapping for assessment. Primary Science Review, 36, 10-12.
Cowie, B. & Bell, B. (1996). Validity and formative assessment in science education, paper presented to the Symposium on Validity in Educational Assessment, Dunedin, New Zealand, 28-30.
Cowie, B. & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 101-106.
Crossland, J. (1998). Teaching for progression in experimental and investigative science, Primary Science Review, 53, 18-19.
Curriculum Development Council (2000). Learning to Learn: General Studies for Primary Schools (Consultation Document). HKSAR Printing Department.
Daws, N. & Singh, B. (1996). Formative assessment into what extent is its potential to enhance pupils science being realized? School Science Review, 77(281), 93-101.
Demers, C. (2000). Beyond paper and pencil assessment, Science and Children (38)3, 24-29.
Diffily, D. (2001). Project Reptile! Science and Children, (38)7, 30-35.
Doris, E. (1991). Doing What Scientists Do: Children Learn to Investigate Their World. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Dougherty, M. J. (1997). Formative assessment: using an instructional model to improve conceptual learning. The Science Teacher, 64(6), 29-33.
Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science, International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481-90.
Edmondson, K. M. (1999). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. D., Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds) Assessing Science Understanding: a Human Constructivist View, 22-33. Toronto: Academic Press.
Farmery, C. (1999). Progression in experimental and investigative science, Primary Science Review, 58, 12-14.
Gibson, J. (1998). Any questions any answer? Primary Science Review, 51, 20-21.
Goldsworthy, A. & Feasey, R. (1994). Making sense of primary science investigation. Herts: Association of Science Education.
Glynn, S. G., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). A constructivist view of learning science. In S, M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany., & B. K. Britton. (Eds) The Psychology of Learning Science, 3-19, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hayes, P. (1998). Assessment in the classroom. In R. Sherrington (Ed.) ASE Guide to Primary Science Education, 125-129. UK: Association for Science Education.
Hollins, W. & Whitby, V. (1998). Progression in Primary Science. Great Britain: David Fulton Publishers.
Hoz, R., Tomer, Y., and Tamir, P. (1990). The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 973-985.
Hughes, C., & Wade, W. (1996). Inspirations for Investigations in Science. Warwickshire: Scholastic.
Jorgenson, M. (1996). Rethinking Portfolios Assessment: Document the Intellectual Work of Learners in Science and Mathematics. ERIC Document Reproduction Services [ED400169].
Leakey, A. & Goldsworthy, A. (2001). Fantastic feedback. Primary Science Review, 68, 22-23.
Lee, O. & Fradd, S. H. (1998) Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds, Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12-21.
Lindsay, C. & Clarke, S. (2001). Enhancing primary science through self- and paired assessment. Primary Science Review, 68, 15-18.
Lowery, L. F. (2000). NSTA Pathways to the Science Standards, Arlington: National Science Teacher Association.
Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
Markow, P. G. & Lonning, R. A. (1998). Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: students?perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1015-1029.
Novak, J. & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D., Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (1999) Learning, teaching and assessment: a human constructivist perspective. In J. D., Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds) Assessing Science Understanding: a Human Constructivist View, 1-13, Toronto: Academic Press.
Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for learning in science, Studies in Science Education, 12, 59-87.
Raizen, S. A., Baron, J. B, Champagne, A. B., Haertel, E., Mullis, I. V. S., & Oakes, J. (1990). Assessment in Science Education: the Middle Years. Washington, DC: National Center for Improving Science Education.
Regis, A., Albertazzi, P.G., & Roletto, E. (1996). Concept maps in chemistry education. Journal of Chemistry Education, 73(11), 1084-1088.
Reinhartz, J. & Beach, D. M. (1997). Teaching and Learning in the Elementary School: Focus on Curriculum. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1103-1127.
Shepardson, D. P. (1997). Butterflies and beetles: first graders' ways of seeing and talking about insect life cycles. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 876-889.
Shepardson, D. P. & Britsch, S. J. (1997). Children's science journals: tools for teaching, learning, and assessing. Science and Children, 34(5), 13-17.
Shepardson, D. P. & Britsch, S. J. (2000). Analyzing children's science journals, Science and Children, (38)3, 29-33.
So, W. M. W. & Cheng, M. H. M. (2001). To facilitate the development of multiple intelligences among primary students through science projects. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(1), Article 4. Available at: http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v2_issue1/sow/.
Spandel, V. (1997). Reflections on portfolios, in G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Learning, 573-591, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stow, W. (1997). Concept mapping, a tool for self-assessment. Primary Science Review, 49, 12-15.
Trowbridge, J. E. & Wandersee, J. H. (1996). How do graphics presented during college biology affect students learning? Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(1), 54-57.
Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2000). Portfolios in science assessment: a knowledge-based model for classroom practice. In J. D., Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds) Assessing Science Understanding: a Human Constructivist View, 167-196. Toronto: Academic Press.
Wallace, J. D. & Mintzes, J. J. (1990). The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1033-1052.
Watts, M., Barber, B., & Alsop, S. (1997). Children's questions in the classroom, Primary Science Review, 49, 6-8.
White, R. and Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Willerman, M. & MacHarg, R. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 705-711.
Copyright (C) 2004 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 8 (Aug., 2004). All Rights Reserved.