Secondary science teachers’ perspectives of teaching outside their subject specialisation

Brannen, J., & Moss, G. (2012). Critical issues in designing mixed methods policy research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56 (6), 789- 801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433796

Caldis, S. (2017). Teaching ‘out-of-field’: Teachers having to know what they do not know. Geog- raphy Bulletin, 49(1), 13–17.

Campbell C., Porsch R., Hobbs L. (2019) Initial Teacher Education: Roles and Possibilities for Preparing Capable Teachers. In: Hobbs L., Törner G. (eds) Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_10

Childs, Ann &McNicholl, Jane. (2007). Investigating the Relationship between Subject Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Practice through the Analysis of Classroom Discourse. International Journal of Science Education - INT J SCI EDUC. 29.1629-1653. 10.1080/09500690601180817.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031009013[Crossref], [Google Scholar]

De Jong, O., Veal, W.R., & Van Driel, J.H. (2002).Exploring Chemistry teachers’ knowledge base. In Gilbert, J.K., de Jong, O., Justi. R., Treagust, D.F. & Van Driel, J.H. (eds). Chemical Education: Teachers Towards Research-Based Practice, p. 369- 390. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Netherlands.

Hashweh, M.Z. (1987).Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics, Teaching and Teacher Education, 3 (2), 109-120.

Hattie, J.A.C. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research Conference, Melbourne,Australia. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/

Hattie, J.A.C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

Hobbs, Linda (2012). Teaching out-of-field: factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics, Teaching science, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 21-29.

Hobbs, Linda &Törner, Günter. (2019). Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-specialist: International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-specialist. 10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8.

Luft,J.A., Hanuscin D., Hobbs Lind &Törner, Günter(2020) Out-of-Field Teaching in Science: An Overlooked Problem, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31:7, 719-724, DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2020.1814052

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vols. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412963947 .

McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009). Teaching Out-of-Field in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2009v34n6.6

Magnusson, S. J., Borko, H., &Krajcik, J. S. (1999).Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical content Knowledge (pp. 95-132). Boston, MA: Kluwer Press.

Mizzi, D. (2013). The Challenges Faced By Science Teachers When Teaching Outside Their Specific Science Specialism.Malta Review of Educational Research Volume 13, No.1., 5-23

Nakiboglu, Canan&Karakoc, Özlem&DeJong, O. (2010).Examining pre-service chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: Influences of teacher course and practice school [Journal of Science Education, (2010), 11, 76-79].Journal of Science Education. 11. 76-79.

NationalEducationPolicy2020,p.22.https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf

National Council of Educational Research and Training(2005). National Curriculum Framework -2005, p.48.New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

National Council of Educational Research and Training (2015). What Students Know and Can Do; A Summary of National Achievement Survey. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

National Council of Educational Research and Training (2019).Learning Outcomes at the Secondary Stage, p 40, New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

National Research Council 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.

Ogunsola-Bandele, M.F. (1999). Teaching Science Courses In and Out of Area of Specialisation in a Single-Sex/Co-Educational Schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, (Boston, MA, March 28-31, 1999). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED429834.pdf

Prabha, S . (2015). Problem solving using self-generated data: learning concept of speed at upper primary stage, European Scientific Journal, 11 (4), No.4 ,351-361.

Prabha, S.(2020). Students’ Views on Difficulties in Conceptual Understanding of Science at Secondary Stage.The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 16, 1-10. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/epess/issue/55066/755941

RoyalSociety of Chemistry, (2014). Inspiring, engaging and expert: the formula for worldclass science and chemistry education. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/globalassets/04-campaigning-outreach/inspring-the-nextgeneration/specialist-teachers-report.pdf (retrieved on 1st May 2021).

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568.