 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 21, Issue 1, Article 6 (Dec., 2021) |
Akaygün, S., Aslan-Tutak, F, Bayazıt, N., Demir, K., & Kesner, J. E. (2015a). Kısaca FeTeMM eğitimi: Öğretmenler ve öğrencileri için iki günlük çalıştay [STEM in a nutshell: A 2-day workshop for teachers and their students]. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T., &. Özdemir, S. (2015b). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: Günün modası mı yoksa gereksinim mi? [A report on STEM Education in Turkey: A provisional agenda or a necessity?][White Paper]. İstanbul, Turkey: Aydın Üniversitesi. Retrieved from http://www.aydin.edu.tr/belgeler/IAU-STEM-Egitimi-Turkiye-Raporu-2015.pdf
Bahçesehir University, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education (BAU, 2015) (2015, July 31). General format. Retrieved from http://nteconf.bahcesehir.edu.tr/2015/
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about STEM about conceptions of STEM in education and patnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 3-11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 5-9.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). A case for STEM education. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers’Association Press.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1-6). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_1
Capraro, R. M., Capraro M. M. & Morgan, J. (2013). STEM Project-based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Scheurich, J. J., Jones, M., Morgan, J., Huggins, K. S., ... & Han, S. (2016). Impact of sustained professional development in STEM on outcome measures in a diverse urban district. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 181-196.
Cavaş, B. (2012) The meaning of and need for “Inquiry Based Science Education (IBSE)”. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(1), 4-6.
Çavaş, B., Bulut, Ç., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Fen eğitimine mühendislik odaklı bir yaklaşım: ENGINEER projesi ve uygulamaları [An engineering-focused approach to science education: ENGINEER projects and applications], Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(1), 12–22.
Chen, YL., Huang, LF. & Wu, PC. (2021). Pre-service Preschool Teachers’ Self-efficacy in and Need for STEM Education Professional Development: STEM Pedagogical Belief as a Mediator. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 137–147. doi:10.1007/s10643-020-01055-3
Çorlu, M. S. (2012). A pathway to STEM education: Investigating pre-service mathematics and science teachers at Turkish universities in terms of their understanding of mathematics used in science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Çorlu, M. S. (2013). Insights into STEM education praxis: An assessment scheme for course syllabi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2477–2485.
Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM Education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74–85.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003002
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? American Educational Research Journal 31(9), 13-25. doi:10.3102/0013189X031009013
Denton, J. J., Davis, T. J., Smith, B. L., Beason, L., & Strader, R. A. (2005, February). The development and implementation of an online professional development model for pre-service teachers education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dugger, W. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. In Technology Education Research Conference. Queensland.
Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art, 249–254. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
European Commission Research & Innovation. (EC, 2015a). General format. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/
European Commission Research & Innovation. (EC, 2015b). General format. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/
European Commission Research & Innovation. (EC, 2015c).General format. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/
Farrokhi, F. & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: defining quality criteria. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 784-792. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792
Guskey, T. R. (2003). Analyzing lists of the characteristics of effective professional development to promote visionary leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 87(637). doi:10.1177/019263650308763702
Han, S., Yalvaç, B., Capraro, MM. & Capraro, RM. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of stem project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76.
Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96–112.
Jacobs, H.H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, C. C. (2012). Four key premises of STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00115.x
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.8. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153–166. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551222
Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Ed.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice (pp. 35–60). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Moskal, B. M., Skokan, C., Kosbar, L., Dean, A., Westland, C., Barker, H., . . Tafoya, J. (2007). K–12 outreach: Identifying the broader impacts of four outreach projects. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 173–189. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00928.x
National Science Foundation [NSF] (2015). Revisiting the STEM Workforce; A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators, Retrieved December 15, 2015, from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201510.pdf
Nite, SB., Capraro, MM., Capraro, RM. & Bicer, A. (2017). Explicating the characteristics of stem teaching and learning: a metasynthesis. Journal of STEM Teacher Education 52(1), 31-53.
Özel, S. (2013). W3 of STEM PBL. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.). STEM project-based learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd Edition). (pp. 41-49). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_12.
Ragusa, G. (2012). Teacher training and student inquiry and science literacy: Linking teacher intervention to students’ outcomes in STEM courses in middle and high school classes. In Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference (pp. 25.1236.1–25.1236.12). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/21993
Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Richards, J. C., Gallo, P. B., & Renandya, W. A. (2001). Exploring teachers’ beliefs and the process of change. PAC Journal, 1(1), 41–58.
Ring, E.A., Dare, E.A., Crotty, E.A. & Roehrig G.H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of stem education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444-467.
Sahin, A., Oren, M., Willson, V., Hubert, T. & Capraro, R. M. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of T-STEM academies: How do texas inclusive stem academies (T-STEM) perform in mathematics, science, and reading? International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(4), 11-21.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
Schachter, A. (2011). Helping STEM take root. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 77, 28-32.
Scott, C. (2012). An investigation of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) focused high schools in the U.S. Journal of STEM Education, 13(5), 30-39.
Shin, Y., & Han, S. (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers` perception in STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) education. Journal of Korea Society of Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
Silverstein, S. C., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S., & Loike, J. D. (2009). Teachers’ participation in research programs improves their students’ achievement in science. Science, 326(5951), 440–442. doi:10.1126/science.1177344
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Stohlman, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.
Stohlman, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson, Boston.
Tas, Y., Yerdelen, S., & Kahraman, N. (2016, May). Adaptation of Teacher Efficacy and Attitudes Toward STEM (T-STEM) Survey into Turkish. Paper presented at International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science & Technology (ICEMST). Bodrum, Turkey.
Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM Education in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Report of a project to identify the missing components. Pennsylvania: Leonard Gelfand Center for Service Learning and Outreach at Carnegie Mellon University and The Intermediate Unit 1 Center for STEM Education.
TUSIAD (2015). Neden TUSIAD? Neden STEM? Retrieved December 15, 2015, from http://www.stemtusiad.org/stemtuesiad-tr/neden-tuesiad-neden-stem
van Es, E. A. (2011). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 182-192. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005
Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13.
Ward, J. D., & Lee, C. L. (2002). A review of problem-based learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 20(1), 16-26.
Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122. doi:10.3102/00346543073001089
Whitaker, S., Kinzie, M., Kraft-Sayer, M., Mashburn, A., & Pianta, R. (2007). Use and evaluation of web-based professional development services across participant levels of support. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(6), 379-386. doi:10.1007/s10643-006-0142-7
