Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 21, Issue 1, Article 2 (Dec., 2021)
Raden Wakhid AKHDINIRWANTO
The effectiveness of blended model of Argumentation Flipped Learning (AFL) in increasing students’ critical thinking skills: A case study of junior high schools during the Covid-19 period

Previous Contents


References

Adhitiya, E. N., Prabowo, A., & Arifuddin, R. (2015). Studi komparasi model pembelajaran traditional flipped classroom dengan peer instruction flipped terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah (Comparative study of traditional flipped classroom learning model with peer instruction flipped on problem solving ability). Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education4(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v4i2.7451.

Akhdinirwanto, R. W., Agustini, R., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). Validitas model PBMA untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMP (The validity of the PBMA model to improve the critical thinking skills of junior high school students). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains PPs UNESA. D269-D277.

Akhdinirwanto, R. W., Agustini, R., & Jatmiko, B. (2020). Problem based learning with argumentation as hypothetical model to increase critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 340-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.19282.

Akhdinirwanto, R. W. (2020). Problem based learning with argumentation feat flipped learning (PBLA-FL) as hypothetical model in covid-19. Europen Modern Studies Journal, 4(5), 1-8.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach; 9th Edition. New Nyork: M c. Graw-Hill Companies Inc.

Aun, S., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 88–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002.

Berland, L. K., & Lee, V. R. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857-1882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.645086.

Besnard, P., dan Hunter, A. (2008). Elements of Argumentation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation skills of effective teaching: Research-based practice. Routledge.

Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S. & Cheunsirimongkol, J. (2015). Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. AcademicJournals, 10(19), 2639-2652. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282859340

Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental disign for research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.

Cargas, S., Williams, S., & Rosenberg, M. 2017. An approach to teaching critical thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 24–37. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.005

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London, New York: Routllege Falmer

Cottrell, S., & Cottrell, O. S. (2005). Developing effective analysis and argument. library. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Dimitrov, D. M. & Rumrill, Jr., P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. IOS Press.

Diniya, & Rusdiana., D. (2018). Improving Students’ Argumentation by Providing Analogical Mapping-Based Through Lab Inquiry for Science Class.. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012053.

Emeren, V., Frans. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eskin, H. & Bekiroglu, F. O. (2013). Argumentation as strategy of conceptual learning of dinamic. Research in Science Education, 43(1939-1956). Doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5.

Fatmawati, D. R., & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi siswa melalui action research (Increasing the argumentative skill of students through action research with focus an action of think pair share). Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 253-259.

Fraenkel, J. L., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H.. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education eighth edition. New York : Mc Graw Hill.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving junior high schools’ critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101–116. DOI: 10.12973/iji.2017.1017a.

Greenhow, C., Lewin, C., & Willet, K. B. S. (2020). The educational response to Covid-19 across two countries: A critical examination of initial digital pedagogy adoption. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1866654.

Gumus, S. S., Gelen, I., & Keskin, A. (2013). Value acquisition, critical thinking skills and the performance of 6th grade students. Education 3-13, 41(3), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2011.570771

Hake, R. T. (1999). Analyzing change/gain score. American educationl research assosiation’s division measurement and research methodology.
Husamah, Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE learning model: improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249-264.        http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/44774.

Joyce, B., Weil M., & Calhoun Emily. (2009). Models of Teaching, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Inc.

Karim & Normaya. (2015). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model jucama di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Students' critical thinking ability in learning mathematics by using the Jucama model in Junior High School). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 92-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i1.634.

Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16-31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131515300373?via%3Dihub#!

Kulatunga, U., Moog., R. S. & Lewis, J. E. (2013). Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2.

Marin, L.M. & Halpern, D.F. (2011). Pedagogy for development critical thinking in adolences: explicit instruction producer greatest. Journal of Thinking Skill and Creativity, 6, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/J.TSC.2010.08.002.

Maslakhatunni’mah, D., Safitri, L. B., & , Agnafia, D. N. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kritis pada mata pelajaran IPA siswa kelas VII SMP (Analysis of critical thinking skills in science subjects for seventh grade junior high school students). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains 2019. 179-185.

Meredith, K.S. & Steele, J.L. (2011). Classrooms of Wonder and Wisdom: Reading, Writing, and Critical Thinking for the 21st Century, Corwin ASAGE Company

Moreno, R. 2010. Educational Psychology. New York: John Weley & Sons Inc.

Munandar, H., Sutrio, S., & Taufik, M. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Media Animasi Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMAN 5 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017 (The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Model Assisted by Animation Media on Critical Thinking Ability and Physics Learning Outcomes of SMAN 5 Mataram Academic Year 2016/2017). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(1), 111-120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i1.526.

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on Conceptual Framework for New K-12Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., & Van, D., A. (2007). Educational design research. New York: Routledge.

Oh, S. & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(95 – 110). Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(463 – 466). Doi: 10.1126/science.1183944.

Pakpahan, R. A. & Siregar, N. (2020). Kemampuan Argumentasi IPA siswa melalui pembelajaran Argument driven Inquiry (ADI) (Students' Science Argumentation Ability through Argument driven Inquiry (ADI) learning). Lensa (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 94-103. http://jurnallensa.web.id/index.php/lensa.

Piaget, J. (2003). The psychology of intelligence. London: Taylor aand Francis e-Library.
PISA. (2018). Assessment And Analytical Framework © OECD 2019.

Putranta, H., Jumadi, & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Physics learning by PhET simulation-assisted using problem based learning (PBL) model to improve students' critical thinking skills in work and energy chapters in MAN 3 Sleman. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 20(1).

Redhana, I. W. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dan Pertanyaan Socratik Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa (Problem Based Learning And Socratic Questions To Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v0i3.1136.

Reimers, F. M. (2021). Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19 (Disruptions to Educational Opportunity). Cambridege: Harvad Graduate School of Education, Harvad University, 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4_4.

Robertshaw, B. & Campbell., T. (2013). Constructing Arguments: Investigating Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation. Skills in a Socio-scientific Context. Science Education International, 24(2), 195–211. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=91508841.

Rudibyani, R. B. (2018). The effectiveness of discovery to improve critical thinking skills college student on mastery of arrhenius acid base. Science, Engineering, Education, and Development Studies (SEEDs): Conference Series Faculty Of Teacher Training And Education Sebelas Maret University, 2(1), 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/seeds.v2i1.24310.

Rukmini, E. (2008). Deskripsi Singkat Revisi Taksonomi Bloom (Brief Description of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy). https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/mip/article/view/7132.

Ruwaida, H. (2019). Proses kognitif dalam Taksonomi Bloom Revisi : Analisis kemampuan mencipta (C6) pada pembelajaran fikih di MI Miftahul Anwar Desa Banua Lawas (Cognitive processes in Revised Bloom's Taxonomy: Analysis of creative ability (C6) in fiqh learning at MI Miftahul Anwar Banua Lawas Village). Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/am.v4i1.168.

Santrock, J. W. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan (Educational Psychology) Edisi 2 Buku 2 (Penerjemah: Harya Bhimasena). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Cell-Metabolism Learning Using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills Model. . International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a.

Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Measuring college learning responsibility. Accountability in a New Era. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.

Siregar, N. & Pakpahan, R. A. (2020).  Kemampuan argumentasi ipa siswa melalui pembelajaran argument driven inquiry (ADI) (Students' science argumentation skills through argument driven inquiry (ADI) learning). Lensa (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA. 10 (2), 94-103. http://jurnallensa.web.id/index.php/lensa.

Suartha, I. N., Setiawan, I. G. A. N., & Sudiatmika, A. A. R. (2020). Pola argumen Toulmin pada proses pembelajaran IPA SMP (Toulmin's argument pattern in the junior high school science learning process). Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. 4(1), 1-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i1.24151.

Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H. & Mokhtar, M. (2007). Conceptual and procedural knowledge problem solving. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 56:416 – 425.

Suwandi, Tawil, M., & Amien, B. D. (2013). Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika  dengan pendekatan pembelajaran problem solving  pada siswa kelas XI IPA1 SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe (Efforts to improve physics learning outcomes with a problem solving learning approach in class XI IPA1 SMA Negeri 1 Parangloe). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 4-13.

Thomas, T. 2017. Developing First Year Students’ Critical Thinking Skills, 7(4), 26–35. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n4p26.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S.  (2012). The Layout of Arguments. In The Uses of Argument. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 7 / cbo9780511840005.007.
UNESCO. (2020). Policy brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads.

Wan, F., Williamson, P. J., & Yin, E. (2015). Antecedents and implications of disruptive innovation : evidence from china. Technovation, 40, 94–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.012.

Wang, J. & Buck, G. A. (2016). Understanding a high school physics teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(577 – 604). Doi: 10.1007/s10972-016-9476.

Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L, & Taufiq, A. (2016). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah dan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa SMA pada Materi Gaya dan Gerak (Scientific Argumentation and Physics Problem Solving Skills for High School Students on Force and Motion Materials). Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM. (I), ISBN: 978-602-9286-21-2.

Wulandari, M. (2020). Konsep dasar metode flipped classroom (The basic concept of the flipped classroom method). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma. https://www.usd.ac.id/pusat/ppip/2020/05/04/konsep-dasar-metode-flipped-classroom/

 

 


Copyright (C) 2021 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 21, Issue 1, Article 2 (Dec., 2021). All Rights Reserved.