The role of anthropomorphisms in students' reasoning about chemical structure and bonding

Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners' use of analogy and alternative conceptions for chemical bonding. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(1), 24–32.

Dorion, K. (2011). A learner's tactic: How secondary students' anthropomorphic language may support learning of abstract science concepts. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 1-22.

Friedler, Y., Zohar, A., & Tamir, P. (1993). The effect of age and of learning on the ability to distinguish between anthropomorphic and teleological explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 439-443.

Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental psychology, 142(4), 1074-1083.

Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P.-O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In K.Tobin, B. J. Fraser, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 281-291). Dordrecht: Springer.

Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom – The interplay between teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology. Science Education, 90(1), 148-163.

Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707-730.

Pickett, J. P., et al. (2000). Anthropomorphism. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, (4th Ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Rundgren, C-J., Hirsch, R., Chang Rundgren, S-N., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2012). Students' communicative resources in relation to their conceptual understanding- The role of non-conventionalized expressions in making sense of visualizations of protein function. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 891-913.

Taber, K. S., & Adbo, K. (2012). Developing chemical understanding in the explanatory vacuum: Swedish high school students' use of an anthropomorphic conceptual framework to make sense of chemical phenomena. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of Matter in Science Education (347-370). Dordrecht: Springer.

Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (1996). The secret life of the chemical bond: Students' anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 557-568.

Talanquer, V. (2013). When atoms want. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1419-1424.

Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325 – 344.

Wickman, P-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601-623.