Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 19, Issue 2, Article 3 (Dec., 2018) Mageswary KARPUDEWAN and Kumareson MATHANASEGARAN Exploring the use of context-based green chemistry experiments in understanding the effects of concentration and catalyst on the rate of reaction Previous Contents

References

Anastas, P.T., &Warner, J.C. (1998). Green Chemistry: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 59-68.

Bristow, B. (2000). The effects of hands-on instruction on 6th-grade student understanding of electricity and magnetism (Unpublished master's thesis). Texas Women's University, Dexton, Texas.

Cacciatore, K. L., & Sevian, H. (2006). Teaching lab report writing through inquiry: a green chemistry stoichiometry experiment for general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1039-1041.

Cakmakci, G. (2010). Identifying alternative conceptions of chemical kinetics among secondary school and undergraduate students in Turkey. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 449-455.

Chairam, S., Somsook, E., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Enhancing Thai students' learning of chemical kinetics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(1), 95-115.

Curriculum Development Centre (2006). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools Curriculum Specification, Chemistry Form 5. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

De Putter-Smits, L. G. A., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2013). Mapping context-based learning environments: The construction of an instrument. Learning Environments Research, 16(3), 437-462.

Eddy, R. M. (2000).Chemophobia in the classroom. Extent, sources and students characteristics. Journal of Chemistry Education, 77(4), 514-517.

Eilks, I., & Rauch,F.(2012). Sustainable development and green chemistry in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,13 (2),57-58

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning By Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach To Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

Goldsby, K. & Raymond, C. (2013). Chemistry (11^th ed).New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Haber, J. (1994). Catalysis-where science and industry meet. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 66(8), 1597-1620.

Hjeresen, D. L., Schutt, D.L., & Boese, J.M. (2000). Green Chemistry and Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(12), 1543-1547.

Hofstein, A., & Yager, R. E. (1982).Societal issues an organization for science education in the '80s. School Science and Mathematics, 82(7), 539-547.

Joel, G. E., Kamji, D. T., & Godiya, E. E. (2016). Enhancing pre-degree chemistry students' conceptual understanding of rates of chemical reactions through cooperative learning strategy. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. 5(7). 322-327.

Juntunen, M., & Aksela, M. (2013). Life-Cycle analysis and inquiry-based learning in chemistry teaching. Science Education International, 24(2), 150-166.

Juntunen, M. K., & Aksela, M. K. (2014). Improving students' argumentation skills through a product life-cycle analysis project in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 639-649.

Karpudewan, M., Ismail, Z., & Roth, W. M.  (2012) Promoting pro-environmental attitudes and reported behaviors of Malaysian pre-service teachers using green chemistry experiments. Environmental Education Research 18(3), 375-389.

Karpudewan, M, Roth, W.M.,  &  Ismail, Z.  (2015). The effects of "Green Chemistry" on secondary school students' understanding and motivation, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24 (1), 35-43.

Karpudewan, M, Roth, W.M.,  &  Sinniah, D.  (2016). The role of green chemistry activities in fostering secondary school students’ understanding of acid–base concepts and argumentation skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17 (4), 893-901.

Kennedy, S. (2016). Design of a dynamic undergraduate green chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 645-649.

Kingir S., & Geban, Ö. (2012). The effect of conceptual change approach on students' understanding of reaction rate concepts. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43. 306-317.

Kırık, Ö. T., & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 221-236.

Kolomuç, A. (2009). Animation aided instruction on "rate of chemical reactions" unit in grade 11 in regard to 5E model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Atatürk University, Ankara, Turkey.

Kurt, S., & Ayas, A. (2012). Improving students' understanding and explaining real life problems on concepts of reaction rate by using a four step constructivist approach. Energy Education Science And Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 979-992.

Mamlok-Naaman, R., Katchevich, D., Yayon, M., Burmeister, M., Feierabend, T., & Eilks, I. (2015). Learning about sustainable development in socio-scientific issues-based chemistry lessons on fuels and bioplastics. In V.G. Zuin and Mammino, L (Ed.), Worldwide Trends in Green Chemistry Education (pp. 45-60). London: RSC.

Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85(2), 158-179.

Ng,W., & Nguyen, V. T. (2006). Investigating the Integration of Everyday Phenomena and Practical Work in Physics Teaching in Vietnamese High Schools. International Education Journal, 7(1), 36-50.

Parrish, A. E. M. (2007). Towards the greening of our minds: A new special topics course. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(2), 245-247.

Parrish, A. E.M. (2014). Toward the greening and sustainable chemistry: A revised semester course based on inspiration and challenges. Journal of Chemistry Education, 91(7), 1084-1086.

Prescott, S. (2013). Green goggles: designing and teaching a general chemistry course to nonmajors using a green chemistry approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(4), 423-428.

Purcell, S. C., Pande, P., Lin, Y., Rivera, E. J., Paw U, L., Smallwood, L. M., Kerstiens, G. A., Armstrong, L. B., Robak, M. A., Baranger, A. M., & Douskey, M. C. (2016). Extraction and antibacterial properties of thyme leaf extracts: Authentic practice of green chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(8), 1422-1427.

Seery, M. (2015). Putting chemistry in context. Education in Chemistry. Retrieved from https://eic.rsc.org/feature/putting-chemistry-in-context/2000106.article

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell,D.T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mi­in.

Sima, J. (2015). Catalysis of chemical processes: Particular teaching aspects. African Journal of Chemical Education, 5(2), 2-15.

Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2015). Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 121-132.

Taber, K.S. & Coll, R.K. (2002). Bonding. Chemical Education. 17,212-234.

Tastan,O., Yalcinkaya, E. & Boz, Y.(2010). Pre-service chemistry teachers' idea about reaction rate mechanisms. Journal Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 47-60.

Turanyi,T., & Toth, Z. (2013). Hungarian university students' misunderstandings in thermodynamics and chemical kinetics, Chemical Education Research and Practices, 14, 105–116.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Ware, S.A. (2001). Teaching chemistry from societal perspective. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73(7), 1209-1214.

Yalçınkaya, E., Taştan-Kırık, Ö., Boz, Y., & Yıldıran, D. (2012). Is case-based learning an effective teaching strategy to challenge students' alternative conceptions regarding chemical kinetics? Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 151-172.