Aiming for responsible and competent citizenship through teacher professional development on teaching socioscientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL)

Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., and Tuan, H. 2004. Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397-419. doi: 10.1002/sce.10118.

Burn, K., H. Hagger, T. Mutton, and T. Everton. 2000. Beyond concerns with self: The sophisticated thinking of beginning student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26 259–78. doi: 10.1080/713676889

Chang, S. N. and Chiu, M. H. 2008. Lakatos' scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753-1773. doi: 10.1080/09500690701534582

Chang Rundgren, S. N. 2015. 'Is the moon more round in the Western world?' - Some important aspects of comparative education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 707-718. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9635-7

Chang Rundgren, S. N. and Rundgren, C.-J. 2010. SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 11 (1): Article 2.
http://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v11_issue1_files/changsn.pdf

Christenson, N. and Chang Rundgren, S. N. 2015. A framework for teachers' Assessment of socio-scientific argumentation: an example using the GMO issue. Journal of Biological Education, 49 (2), 204-212. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2014.923486

European Commission 2015. Science education for responsible citizenship. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2777/12626

Fensham, P. J. 2009. The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research. Science Education, 93, 1076–1095. doi: 10.1002/sce.20349

Fuller, F.F., and O.H. Bown. 1975. Becoming a teacher. In Teacher education: The 74th Year-book of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 11, edited by Kevin Ryan, 25–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.1177/002248717502600243

Guest, G., MacQuee, K. M., and Namey, E. E. 2011. Applied Thematic Analyses. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483384436

Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P.-O., and Holmgren, S.-O. 2010. Secondary science teachers' selective traditions and examples of inquiry-oriented approaches. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 6(1), 44-60. doi: 10.5617/nordina.269

Hamza, K., Palm, O., Palmqvist, J., Piqueras, J., and Wickman, P.-O. 2017. Hybridization of practices in teacher–researcher collaboration. European Educational Research Journal doi: 10.1177/1474904117693850

Harrison, C., Hofstein, A., Eylon, B., and Simon, S. 2008. Evidence based professional development of science teachers in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 571–591. doi:10.1080/09500690701854832.

Hattie, J. A. C. 2008. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203887332

Jidesjö, A. Oscarsson, M., Karlsson, K.-G., and Strömdahl, H. 2009. Science for all or science for some: What Swedish students want to learn about in secondary science and technology and their opinions on science lessons. NorDiNa Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(2), 214-229. doi: 10.5617/nordina.352

Klafki, W. 2000. The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. In Teaching as a reflective practice:The German Didaktik tradition, edited by Ian Westbury, Stefan Hopmann, and Kurt Riquarts, 85–108. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9780203357781

Knippels, M. C. 2015. Toward socio-scientific inquiry-based learning in teacher education – Experiences from across Europe. Symposium organized during the 11th Conference of European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Helsinki, Finland, August 31- September 4.

Kolstø S. D. 2001. Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310. doi: 10.1002/sce.1011

Lunde, T., Rundgren, C.-J., and Chang Rundgren, S.N. 2015. När läroplan och tradition möts – hur högstadielärare bemöter yttre förväntningar på undersökande arbete i naturämnesundervisningen. [How lower secondary science teachers meet external expectations on inquiry-based science teaching] NorDiNa (Nordic Studies in Science Education) 11 (1): 88-101. doi: 10.5617/nordina.783

Mogensen, F. and Schnack, K. 2010. The action competence approach and the 'new' discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16, 59–74. doi: 10.1080/13504620903504032

Nilsson, P. and Loughran, J. (2012) Exploring the Development of Pre-Service Science Elementary Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23 (7), 699-721. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y

Nilsson, P. 2009. From lesson plan to new comprehension: exploring student teachers' pedagogical reasoning in learning about teaching, European Journal of Teacher Education, 32 (3), 239-258. doi: 10.1080/02619760802553048

Pitiporntapin, S., Yutakom, N., and Sadler, T. D. 2016. Thai pre-service science teachers' struggles in using Socio-scientific Issues (SSIs) during practicum. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), Article 13. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v17_issue2_files/pitiporntapin.pdf

Roberts D. A. 2007. Scientific literacy/science literacy. In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by Norman G. Ledermann, and Sandra K. Abell, 729–780, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., and Hemmo, V. 2007. Science education now. A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E. et al. 2009. Palnetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology & Society, 14 (2), 32-63. doi: 10.5751/es-03180-140232

Rundgren, C.-J. 2017. Implementation of inquiry-based science education in different countries: some reflections. Cultural Studies of Science Education doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9787-8.

Rundgren, C.-J., Eriksson, M., and Chang Rundgren, S. N. 2017. Investigating the intertwinement of knowledge, value and experiences of upper secondary students' argumentation concerning socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 25(9), 1049-1071. doi: 10.1007/s11191-016-9859-x

Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., and Scott, B. 2007. What do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9

Sadler, T. D., and Zeidler, D. L. 2005. Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. doi: 10.1002/tea.20042

Schneider, K. 2012. The subject‐ object transformations and 'Bildung'. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44, 302–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00696.x

Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Shulman, L. S. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189x015002004

Shulman, L. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harward Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Shulman, L.S. 2015. PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education, edited by Amanda Berry, Patricia Friedrichsen, and John Loughran, 3–13. New York, NY: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315735665

Simonneaux, L. 2008. Argumentation in socio-scientific contexts. In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research edited by Sibel Eduran and María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, 179-199. Doetinchem, The Netherlands: Springer.

Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G. and Eilks, I. 2017. Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education doi:10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649

Stuckey, M., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., and Eilks, I. 2013. The meaning of 'relevance' in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49, 1-34. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2013.802463

Sumner, J. 2000. Serving the System: A critical history of distance education, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 15( 3), 267-285. doi:10.1080/713688409

the Design-Based Research Collective 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189x032001005

Vaino, K., Holbrook, J., and Rannikmae, M. 2012. Stimulating students' intrinsic motivation for learning chemistry through the use of context-based learning modules. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 410-419. doi: 10.1039/c2rp20045g

Westbury, Ian, Stefan Hopmann, and Kurt Riquarts, eds. 2000. Teaching as reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9780203357781

Walan, S. and Chang Rundgren, S. N. 2015. Student responses to context- and inquiry-based three-step teaching model. Teaching Science, 61(2), 33-39. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=488672434633284;res=IELHS

Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108