 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 19, Issue 1, Article 2 (Jun., 2018) |
Alsharif, K. (2014). How do teacher interpret the term ‘contructivism’ as a teaching approach in the Riyadh primary schools context? Procedia Social and behavorial Science, 141, 1009-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.170.
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing 7th Ed. Upper saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Arends, R.I. (2001). Learning to Teach. 5th Ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Higher Education
Berliner, D.C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205-213.
Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students’ knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 53-66.
Buzan, T. (2009). Buku Pintar Mind Mapping. Gramedia. Jakarta.
Byman, R., Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2012). Motivational orientation in physics learning: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 379–392
Campbell, D.T & Stanley, J.C. (1979). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on Teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Cindy. W. C. & Kamisah. O. (2016). The effect of Kayeu Learning outside the classrrom primary science module on intrinsic motivation of indigenous learners. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 360–370.
Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology. 51. 171-200.
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research 4th Ed. Pearson Educational Inc. New Jersey.
D’Souza, K. A. & Maheshwari, S. K. (2010). Factors influencing student performance in the Introductory Management Science course. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(3), 99-120.
Danielson, C. (2006). Teacher Leadership That Strengthens Professional Practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Debevec, K., Shih, M,Y., & Kashyap, V. (2006). Learning strategies and performance in a technology integrated clasroom. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 38(3), 293-307.
Donald, S., & Barbara, Y. (2003). Using concept mapping to aid African American students' understanding in middle grade science. Journal of Negro Education, 72(3), 333-337.
Elaine, S.C. & Melissa, T.C. (2004). Group reward contingencies and cooperative learning: immediate and delayed effects on academic performance, self-esteem, and sosiometric raings. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 73-87.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Education Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
George, J.M., & Jones G.R. (2005). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior 4th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Gupta, M., & Pasrija, P. (2012). Cooperative learning: An efficient technique to convert students into active learners in classrooms. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 2 (1), 21-33.
Hafizah, H., Wahab, D. A., Hussain, A., Samad, S. A., Mohamed, A., Azhari, C. H., & Tahir, N. M. (2010). Kajian kes ke atas kesan kaedah pembelajaran koperatif teknik’Jigsaw’dalam kursus isyarat dan sistem. ASEAN Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2(1), 12-21.
Hakim, A., Liliasari, Kadarohman, A., Syah, Y.M. (2016). Effect of the natural product mini project laboratory on the students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 27-36.
Hamalik, O. (1993). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Martiana
Kamarul, S. M. T., & Embi. M. A. (2009). Korelasi strategi dengan motivasi dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 24, 109–123
Kamisah, O., Lilia, H., & Zanaton, H.I. (2007). Sikap terhadap sains dan sikap saintifik di kalangan pelajar sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 32, 39-60.
Kamisah, O., Wahidin, & Subahan. M. M. (2013) Concept mapping in chemistry lessons: Tools for inculcating thinking skills in chemistry learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 666-681.
Karno, T. (1996). Mengenal analisis Tes. (Pengantar ke Program Komputer ANATES). Bandung: Jurusan Psikologi dan Bimbingan FIP IKIP Bandung.
Kassaian, Z., & Ghadiri, M. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between motivation and metacognitive awareness strategies in listening comprehension: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1069-1079.
Ku, T. D., Shih, J.L., & Hung, S.H. (2014). The integration of concept mapping in a dynamic assessment model for teaching and learning accounting. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 141–153.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135-142.
Orbanic, N.D., Dimec, D.S., & Cencic, M. (2016). The effectiveness OD a conctructivist teaching model on students’ understanding of photosynthesis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 575–587.
Osbrone, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implication. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079.
Owens, L., (2006). Teacher radar: The view from the front of the class. Journal of Physical Education, Reaction and Dance, 77(4), 29-34.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Bershire.UK: Open Universiti Press
Pintrich, P.R. (1996). Motivation and Classroom Learning. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chuda, J. (2007). Slovakian students’ attitudes towards biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 287-295.
Putra, Y. P. (2008). Memori dan Pembelajaran Efektif. CV. Bandung: Yrama Widya
Richardson, H., Tapia, A., & Kvasny, L. (2006). Social science computer review. Special Issue on Applying Critical Theory to the Study of ICT, 24 (3), 267-273.
Sadi, O., & Uyar, M. (2013). The Relationship between self-efficacy, self regulated learning strategies and achievement: a path model. Journal of Baltic Eduction, 12 (1), 21–33.
Sardiman, A.M. (2003). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Slavin, R. (2008). Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Nusa Dua
Soika, K., & Reiska, P. (2014) Using concept mapping for assessment in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 662-673.
Stoner, James A.F. & Freeman, E. (1992). Manajemen. Jakarta: Inter Media
Suciati. (2005). Rekonstruksi Mata Kuliah. Jakarta: Pusat Antar Universitas Untuk Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Instruksional Universitas Terbuka (UT)
Temel, T., & Özcan, Ö. (2016). The analysis of prospective chemistry teachers’ cognitive structure: the subject of covalent and ionic bonding. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 1953-1969. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1273a
Tseng, K.H., Chang, C.C., Lou S.J., Tan, Y., & Chiu C. J. (2012). How concept-mapping perception navigates student knowledge transfer performance. Educational Technology and Society, 15 (1), 102-115.
Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89.
Winardi. (2004). Motivasi dan pemotivasian dalam manajemen. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Windura, T. (2011). Peta Minda Langkah Demi Langkah. Kuala Lumpur: BS Print (M) Sdn.Bhd
Winkel, W. (1987), Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Woolfolk, H. (2004). Educational Psychology. Boston: Pearson Educational
Yigit, E. A. (2015). Exploring the relationship between cognitive structure outcomes and test achievements of pre-service science teachers on chemical bonding via flow mapping. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 524-534.
