A technological acceptance of remote laboratory in chemistry education

Alkhaldi, T., Pranata, I., & Athauda, R. I. (2016). A review of contemporary virtual and remote laboratory implementations: Observations and findings. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(3), 329-351.

Aypay, A., Çelik, H. C., Aypay, A., & Sever, M. (2012). Technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers in Turkey. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 264-272.

Chan, C., & Fok, W. (2009). Evaluating learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions: A case study in electrical and electronic engineering at The University of Hong Kong. Engineering Education, 4(2), 70-75.

Chua, Y. P. (2013). Mastering research statistics. Selangor: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

Considine, H., Teng, M., Nafalski, A., & Nedić, Z. (2016).Recent developments in remote laboratory NetLab. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(1), 16-21.

Cooper, M., Donnelly, A., & Ferreira, J. (2002). Remote controlled experiments for teaching over the internet: A comparison of approaches developed in the PEARL project. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Auckland, New Zealand: UNITEC Institution of Technology.

Cooper, M., & Ferreira, J. M. M. (2009). Remote laboratories extending access to science and engineering curricular. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 342–353.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 983-1003.

Dey, A., Hell, M., Rolf, C. C., Stankovski, P., & Ågren, M. (2010). Laboratory instructions as a cause of student dissonance. Paper presented at Lund Institute of Technology (LTH)’s 6th Pedagogical Inspiration Conference (LTHs 6th Pedagogical Inspirationskonferens), Lund, Sweden.

Fallon, T. (2013). Survey of existing remote laboratories used to conduct laboratory exercises for distance learning courses. Paper presented at the 120th Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE), Atlanta, GA.

Gomes, L., & Garcia-Zubia, J. (2007). Advances on remote laboratories and e-learning experiences. Bilbao: University of Deusto.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.

Iskandar, Y. H. P., Mahmud, N. E., Wahab, W. N. A. W. A., Jamil, N. I. N., & Basir, N. (2013). The development of teaching and learning in bright-field microscopy technique. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 31-43.

Kelly, O. C., & Finlayson, E. (2007). Providing solutions through problem-based learning for the undergraduate 1st year chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 347-361.

Khattar, F., Luthon, F., Larroque, B., & Dornaika, F. (2016, July). Using computer vision for student-centred remote lab in electronics. Paper presented at 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Kurbanoglu, N., & Akin, A. (2010). The relationships between university students’ chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes, and self-efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(8), 48-59.

Lowe, D., Yeung, H., Tawfik, M., Sancristobal, E., Castro, M., Orduña, P., et al. (2016). Interoperating remote laboratory management systems (RLMSs) for more efficient sharing of laboratory resources. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 43(C), 21-29.

Maxwell, A. D., Orwin, L., Kist, A. A., Maiti, A., Midgley, W., & Ting, W. (2013). An inverted remote laboratory - makers and gamers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2013), Toowoomba, Australia.

Mokhtar, A., Mikhail, G. R., & Joo, C. S. (2014). A survey on remote laboratories for e-learning and remote experimentation. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 7(29), 1617-1624.

Myers, J. M., & Halpin, R. (2002) Teachers’ attitudes and use of multimedia technology in the classroom: Constructivist-based professional development training for school districts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 133-140.

Nafalski, A., Nedić, Z., Teng, M., & Gadzhanov, S. (2016). A remote measurement laboratory using NetLab. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(1), 45-50.

Nidup, T., & Yodyingyong, S. (2015). Inexperience students’ perception, difficulties and challenges towards implementation of lab-based inquiry approach: A case study in Bhutan. Proceeding of the 3rd Global Summit on Education GSE 2015, (pp. 390-399). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Ogot, M., Elliott, G., & Glumac, N. (2002). Hands-on laboratory experience via remote control: Jet thrust laboratory. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, (pp. 7.603.1-7.603.18). Montreal, Canada.

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.

Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172-185.

Sauter, M., Uttal, D. H., Rapp, D. N., Downing, M., & Jona, K. (2013). Getting real: The authenticity of remote labs and simulations for science learning. Distance Education, 34(1), 37-47.

Teo, T. (2011). Technology acceptance in education. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Teo, T., Wong, S. L., & Chai, C. S. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280.

Tho, S. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2016). Technology-enhanced science learning through remote laboratory: System design and pilot implementation in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 96-111.

Tho, S. W., Yeung, Y. Y., Wei, R., Chan, K. W., & So, W. W. M. (2016). A systematic review of remote laboratory work in science education with the support of visualizing its structure through the Hist Cite and Cite Space software. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Advanced online publication. doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9740-z

Ursutiu, D., Cotfas, P., & Samoila, C. (2007). Graphical programming and remote controlled laboratories. In L. Gomes, & J. Garcia-Zubia (Eds.), Advances on remote laboratories and e-learning experiences, (pp. 151-186). Bilbao: University of Deusto.

Velasquez, Y., Ramos, O., & Amaya, D. (2016). Technology used for the implementation of remote laboratories. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(6), 7456-7461.

Willis, T. J. (2008). An evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model as a means of understanding online social networking behaviour (Doctoral Dissertations, University of South Florida). Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/568

Wong, K. T., Rosma, O., Goh, P. S. C., & Mohd Khairezan, R. (2013). Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89-104.

Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1190–1207.

Zol, B. R., & Daud, M. H. (2014, November). Approach of assessing ‘hands-on’ in laboratory exercises in engineering technology courses. Paper presented at 8th MUCET 2014, Melaka, Malaysia.

Župerl, U., & Virtič, M. P. (2013). Remote controlled laboratory as a modern form of engineering education. Journal of Elementary Education, 6(1), 27-42.