Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 18, Issue 2, Article 5 (Dec., 2017) |
Data Analysis
The number of learners for each level of situational interest has been determined. The results of the experiment are presented in Table IV.Table IV. Results of measurements in CG and EG
The level of situational interestPre-test (number of learners)
Post-test (number of learners)
CG
EG
CG
EG
low
14
12
16
5
average
24
24
24
28
high
7
6
5
9
Statistical analysis
Pearson’s chi-squared test χ2 for the analysis of received data has been used. Measurements were conducted in a three-level scale of gradation. As a rule, significance level of 5% is used in pedagogical researches. Critical chi-squared value for this significance level in the three-level scale of gradation equals 5.99. Pre-test results show that no difference between control and experimental groups because chi-squared statistic χ2 is less than value 5.99. Post-test results show that there is a difference between two groups because chi-squared statistic χ2 is more than value 5.99. In this way, post-test results have confirmed the alternative hypothesis: the difference between critical chi-squared value and calculated chi-squared value is due with not accidental, but with essential reasons – the use of the interdisciplinary approach in physics teaching. Since we used significance level of 5%, then the reliability of difference is equal to 95%.
Copyright (C) 2017 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 18, Issue 2, Article 5 (Dec., 2017). All Rights Reserved.