Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321.
Anderson, J. L., & Barnett, M. (2013). Learning physics with digital game simulations in middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 914–926.
Angier, N. (2008). The canon: A whirligig tour of the beautiful basics of science. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Applefield, J. M., Huber, R., & Moallem, M. (2000). Constructivism in theory and practice: toward a better understanding. High School Journal, 84(2), 35.
Bakac, M., Tasoglu, A. K., & Akbay, T. (2010). The effect of computer assisted instruction with simulation in science and physics activities on the success of student: Electric current. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 1(1), 34-42.
Bayrak, C. (2008). Effects of computer simulations programs on university students’ achievements in physics. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 53-62.
Bergen, D. (2009). Play as the learning medium for future scientists, mathematicians, and engineers. American Journal of Play, 1(4), 413-428.
Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84(4), 486-506.
Bozkurt, E., & Ilik, A. (2010). The effect of computer simulations over students’ beliefs on physics and physics success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4587-4591.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Cakiroglu, J. (2006). The effect of learning cycle approach on students' achievement in science. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (22), 61-73.
Chang, W. (2008). Challenges encountered in implementing constructivist teaching in physics: A qualitative approach. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1-16.
Clark, D., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Paper presented at the Learning Science: Computer Games, Simulations, and Education Workshop sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm shifts in designed instruction: from behaviorism to cognitivism to constructivism. Educational Technology, 33(5), 12-19.
Department of Curriculum and Research Development, Ministry of Education. (2009a). 9-10 Syllabus. Paro: Department of Curriculum and Research Development.
Department of Curriculum and Research Development, Ministry of Education. (2009b). 11-12 Syallabus. Paro: Department of Curriculum and Research Development.
Dilley, P. (2000). Conducting successful interviews: Tips for intrepid research. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 131.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). 1.1 Learning in science-from behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser and K. J. Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, 3-25.
co, J., & Garcia, C. (2001). An instrument to help teachers assess learners' attitudes towards multimedia instruction. Education, 122(2), 94-102.
Foong, S. K., Lee, P., Wong, D., & Chee, Y. P. (2010). On the conceptual understanding of the photoelectric effect. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1263(1), 114-117.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at the Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 8th -10th October 2003, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. (2005). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. (5th ed). Belmont, CA.: Thomson Learning.
Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (2010). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
Hughes, A. L., & DuBridge, L. A. (1932). Photoelectric phenomena. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Hyvonen, P. T. (2011). Play in the school context? The perspectives of finnish teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8), 65-83.
Jacelon, C. S., & Imperio, K. (2005). Participant diaries as a source of data in research with older adults. Qualitative health research, 15(7), 991-997.
Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 17, 1-10.
James, A. (1973). Photoelectric effect, a common fundamental error. Physics Education, 8(6), 382-384.
Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2001). Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: a case study on students' understanding of trajectory motion. Computers and Education, 36(2), 183-204.
Klassen, K., & Willoughby, K. (2003). In-class simulation games: Assessing student learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2(1), 1-13.
Klassen, S. (2011). The photoelectric effect: Reconstructing the story for the physics classroom. Science and Education, 20(7), 719-731.
Knight, R. (2004). Physics for scientists and engineers: A strategic approach. San Francisco: Addison Wesley.
Liu, X., & Li, Q. (2011). Combination of the research-based learning method with the modern physics experiment course teaching. International Education Studies, 4(1), 101-104.
McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2009). A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 77(1), 87-94.
McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Mohanty, S. D., & Cantu, S. (2011). Teaching introductory undergraduate physics using commercial video games. Physics Education, 46(5), 570-577.
Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2008). Views about physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 435-462.
Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2012). Views about learning physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(5), 429-449.
Ornek, F., & Zziwa, B. J. (2011). Measuring “g” by using trajectory projectile motion: 5E learning cycle and low-cost materials. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1-7.
Osborne, J. (1990). Sacred cows in physics - Towards a redefinition of physics education. Physics Education, 25(4), 189-196.
Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154-166.
Rezaei, A. R., & Katz, L. (2002). Using computer assisted instruction to compare the inventive model and the radical constructivist approach to teaching physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(4), 367-380.
Rias, R. M., & Zaman, H. B. (2011). Designing multimedia learning application with learning theories: A case study on a computer science subject with 2-D and 3-D animated versions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 12(2), 1-32.
Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2, 49-60.
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58(1), 136-153.
Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I., & Costu, B. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of an active learning based-interactive conceptual instruction (ALBICI) on electric field concept. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1-41.
Singh, C., Moin, L., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). Introduction to physics teaching for science and engineering undergraduates. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(3), 3-10.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
Steinberg, R. N., Oberem, G. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1996). Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 64(11), 1370-1379.
Steinberg, R. N., & Oberem, G. E. (2000). Research-based instructional software in modern physics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(2), 115-136.
Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. International journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.
Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wernbacher, T., Pfeiffer, A., Wagner, M., & Hofstätter, J. (2012). Learning by playing: can serious games be fun? The paper presented at the 6th European Conference on Games Based Learning (ECGBL 2012), 4th-5th October 2012, Cork, Ireland.
Wuttiprom, Sura. (2008). Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics. (Ph.D. Thesis in Science and Technology Education), Maidol University, Nakhon Pathom.
