Science and technology teachers’ attitudes towards educational research in Turkey

Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295-301.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: For applied research. New York: Guilford.

Buyukozturk, S. Cokluk-Bokeoglu, O., & Koklu, N. (2012). Sosyal bilimler icin istatistik [Statistics for social sciences] (11. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Akademi.

Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. (2000). Predictors of educators‟ valuing of systematic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 15, 25-52.

De Jong, O. (2004). Mind your step: Bridging the research-practice gap. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 64, 5-9.

Ekiz, D. (2006). Sınıf ogretmenlerinin egitim arastırmalarına karsı tutumları [Primary school teachers’ attitudes towards educational research]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 373-402.

Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2002). Educational research and the teacher. Research Papers in Education, 17(4), 373-401.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th edition). London: SAGE Publications.

Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [Re]Visioning the academic–teacher divide: power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 10(1), 35-58.

Greenwood, C. R., & Maheadly, L. (2001). Are future teachers aware of the gap between research and practice and what should they know? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 333-347.

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve Professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449-471.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

Ilhan, N., Sekerci, A. R., Sozbilir, M. & Yıldırım, A. (2013). Egıtım arastırmalarına yonelik ogretmen tutum olceginin gelistirilmesi: Gecerlik ve guvenirlık calısması [The development of teachers attitude scale towards educational research: the validity and reliability study]. Western Anatolia Journal of Educations Sciences, 4(8), 31-56.

Isakson, R. L., & Ellsworth, R. (1978). Teachers’ attitudes toward educational research: It’s time for a change. The Teacher Educator, 14(2), 9-13. doi:10.1080/08878737809554696.

Kaestle, C. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23 - 31.

Kempa, R. (2002). Research and research utilization in chemical education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(3), 327-343.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd. ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Korkmaz, O., Sahin, A., & Yesil, R. (2011a). Ogretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Arastırmalara Yonelik Tutumları. [Candidate Teachers’ Attitude toward Scientific Research] International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 1169-1194.

Korkmaz, O., Sahin, A., & Yesil, R. (2011b). Ogretmenlerin Bilimsel Arastırmalara ve Arastırmacılara iliskin dusunceleri [Teachers’ Opinion Regarding Scientific Researches and Researchers]. Kuramsal Egitim bilim Dergisi, 4(2), 109-127.

McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357-382.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Factor structure of the “Attitudes Toward Research” scale. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 16-26.

Sumer, N. (2000). Yapısal esitlik modellerı: Temel kavramlar ve ornek uygulamalar [Structural equation modeling: basic concepts and sample applications]. Turk Psıkolojı Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.

Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299 – 316.

Yavuz, M. (2009). Egıtım arastırmaları ile ilgili ogretmen ve yonetici goruslerinin analizi[An analysis of thought of teachers and principals on educational research]. Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 27, 143-158.

Yıldırım, A., Ilhan, N., Sekerci, A. R. & Sozbilir, M. (2014). Fen ve teknolojı ogretmenlerinin egitim arastırmalarını takip etme, anlama ve uygulamalarda kullanma duzeyleri: Erzurum ve Erzincan ornegi [Science teachers’ level of following, understanding and using of educational researches: the example of Erzurum and Erzincan]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 22(1), 81-100.

Yıldırım, A., Sozbilir, M., Ilhan, N., & Sekerci, A. R. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji ogretmenlerinin fen egitimi arastırmalarını takip etme, anlama ve sonuclarını uygulamaya yansıtma durumlarının incelenmesı [The determination of science and technology teacher’s levels of awareness and understanding of education research and the state of using research finding in the class practicing]. TUBITAK Project Report, ProjectNo:108K325.http://uvt.ulakbim.gov.tr/uvt/index.php?cwid=9&vtadi=TPRJ&ano=121431_662d887a4290e12e1dd59df7ad6078af (Access date: 11 August 2013).

Zeuli, J. (1994). How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 39-55.