 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 18, Issue 1, Article 7 (Jun., 2017) |
Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.
Andersson, B. & Bach, F. (2005). On designing and evaluating teaching sequences taking geometrical optics as an example. Science Education, 89(2), 196-218.
Anıl, Ö. & Küçüközer, H. (2010). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin düzlem ayna konusunda sahip oldukları ön bilgi ve kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi.Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(3), 104-122.
Bell, P. & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817
Blizak, D., Chafiqi, F. & Kendil, D. (2009). Students misconceptions about light in Algeria. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. EMA5). Optical Society of America.
Blizak, D., Chafiqi, F. & Kendil, D. (2013). What thinks the university's students about propagation of light in the vacuum?. European Scientific Journal, 9(24).
Blizak, D. & Chafiqi, F. (2014). Determination of University Students’ Misconceptions about Light Using Concept Maps. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 582-589.
Breen, R. & Lindsay, R. (2002). Different disciplines require different motivations for student success. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 693-725.
Chafiqi, F. & Blizak, D. (2014). L’effet de l'utilisation de l'histoire des sciences dans enseignement de l'optique géométrique sur la motivation d’apprentissage. Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii" Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iaşi. Ştiinţe ale Educatiei, (XVIII), 43-68.
Changeiywo, J. M., P. W. Wambugu, P. W. & Wachanga, S. W. (2012). Investigations of students’ motivation towards learning secondary school physics through mastery learning approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1333-1350.
Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Iournal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Dedes, C. (2005). The mechanism of vision: Conceptual similarities between historical models and children’s representations. Science & Education, 14(7-8), 699-712.
De Hosson, C. & Kaminski, W. (2007). Historical controversy as an educational tool: evaluating elements of a teaching–learning sequence conducted with the text “dialogue on the ways that vision operates”. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 617-642.
Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
Duit, R. (2006). Bibliography. Students’ alternative frameworks and science education STCSE. (http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html).
Elcin, M. & Sezer, B. (2014). An Exploratory Comparison of Traditional Classroom Instruction and Anchored Instruction with Secondary School Students: Turkish Experience. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 523-530.
Fettahlioglu, P. & Ekici, G. (2011). Affect of teacher candidates’ academic self-efficacy beliefs on their motivations towards sciences. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2808–2812.
Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
Goldberg, F. M. & Bendall, S. (1995). Making the invisible visible: A teaching/learning environment that builds on a new view of the physics learner. American Journal of Physics, 63(11), 978–991.
Goldberg, F. M. & McDermott, L.C. (1986). Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror. Phys. Teach. 24, 472-480.
Goldberg, F. M. & Bendall, S. (1995). Intermediate States and Powerful Ideas: Learning about Image Formation.
Guesne, E. (1985). Children’s ideas in science (pp.10-32). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 159-168.
Heywood, D. S. (2005). Learning and Teaching About Light: Some pedagogic implications for initial teacher training. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1447-1475.
Kaewkhong, K., Mazzolini, A., Emarat, N. & Arayathanitkul, K. (2010). Thai high-school students' misconceptions about and models of light refraction through a planar surface. Physics Education, 45(1), 97.
Kaminski, W. (1989). Conceptions des élèves (et autres) sur la lumière. Bulletin de l’union des physiciens, n° 176, 973-996.
Kousathana, M., Demerouti M. & Tsaparlis G. (2005). Instructional misconceptions in acid-base equilibria: an analysis from a history and philosophy of science perspective. Sci. & Educ., 14, 173-193.
Libarkin, J. C., Asghar, A., Crockett, C. & Sadler, P. (2011). Invisible misconceptions: Student understanding of ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Astronomy Education Review, 10(1), 010105.
Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J. & Kim, Y. C. (2001). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251-258.
Lindahl, B., Rosberg, M., Ekborg, M., Ideland, M., Malmberg, C., Rehn, A. & Winberg, M. (2011). Socio-scientific issues: a way to improve students’ interest and learning?. US-China Education Review B, 1(3), 342-347.
Martinand, J.L. (1993). Histoire et didactique de la physique et de la chimie : quelles relations? . Didaskalia, de Boeck, n°2, 89-99.
Mihas, P. (2008). Developing Ideas of Refraction, Lenses and Rainbow Through the Use of Historical Resources. Science & Education 17, 751–777.
Mistrioti, G. (2003). Optique géométrique et interprétation de la vision par les étudiants universitaires: un modèle d'interprétation de la vision d'une image virtuelle (Doctoral dissertation, Paris 7).
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science education, 81(4), 405-424.
Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K.M. & Adelson, J. L. (2012). Self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and academic outcomes among Latino middle school students participating in an after-school program. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34, 118-136.
Noels, K. A., Clément, R. & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23-34.
Oon, P. T. & Subramaniam, R. (2009). The nature of light: I. A historical survey up to the pre-Planck era and implications for teaching. Physics Education, 44(4), 384.
Palacios, F. J. P., Cazorla, F. N. & Madrid, A. C. (1989). Misconceptions on geometric optics and their association with relevant educational variables. International Journal of Science Education, 11(3), 273-286.
Palmer, D. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87(5), 663-684.
Piaget, J. & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. Columbia University Press.
Pintrich, P. A., Marx, R. W. & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227.
Rashed, R. 1992. Optique et Mathématiques: Recherches sur L’Histoire de la pensee Scientifique En Arabe (collected works), Variorum.
Sabra, A. I. (1981). Theories of light, from Descartes to Newton. CUP Archive.
Şahin, Ç., Ipek, H. & Ayas, A. (2008). Students’ understanding of light concepts primary school: A cross-age study. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science learning and teaching, 9(1), Article 7.
Şeker, H. (2011). A Facilitator Model for the Use of History of Science in Science Teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 8(3), 59-68.
Solbes, J. & Traver, M. (2003). Against a Negative Image of Science: History of Science and the Teaching of Physics and Chemistry, Science & Education 12, 703–717.
Song, J., Cho, S. K. & Chung, B. H. (1997). Exploring the parallelism between change in students' conceptions and historical change in the concept of inertia. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 87-100.
Strike, K.A. & Posner, G.J. (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 231-240.
Taşlidere, E. (2013). The Effect of Concept Cartoon Worksheets on Students’ Conceptual Understandings of Geometrical Optics Kavram Karikatürleri ile Zenginleştirilmiş Çalışma Yapraklarının Öğrencilerin Geometrik Optik Konusundaki Kavramsal Anlamalarına Etkisi. Education, 38(167).
Tiberghien, A. (1999). Labwork activity and learning physics-an approach based on modeling. Practical work in science education, 176-194.
Ürey, M. & Çalık, M. (2008). Combining different conceptual change methods within 5e model: a sample teaching design of ‘cell’concept and its organelles. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), Article 12.
Uzun, S., Alev, N. & Karal, I. S. (2013). A Cross-Age Study of an Understanding of Light and Sight Concepts in Physics. Science Education International, 24(2), 129-149.
Vallerand, R.J. & Thill, Edgar E. (1993). Introduction à la psychologie de la motivation. Laval (Quebec) : Editions Etudes Vivantes, 674.
Vergnaud, G., Halbwachs, F. & Rouchier, A. (1978). Structure de la matière enseignée, histoire des sciences et développement conceptuel chez l'élève. Revue française de pédagogie, 7-15.
Viau, R. (1994). La motivation en contexte scolaire. Saint-Laurent, QC: Éditions Du Renouveau Pédagogique.
Viennot, L. (1996). Raisonner en physique. De Boeck.
Zemplén, G. Á. (2007). Conflicting agendas: Critical thinking versus science education in the international baccalaureate theory of knowledge course. Science & Education, 16(2), 167-196.
