Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 17, Issue 2, Article 18 (Dec., 2016)
Senar TEMEL
An analysis of prospective chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures through flow map method: The subject of oxidation and reduction

Previous Contents


References

Anderson, O. R. (1992). Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1037–1058.

Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. J. (1993). A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’ narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 953–969.

Anderson, O. R., Randle, D., & Covotsos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students. Science Education, 85(4), 410–425.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Bascones, J., & Novak. J. D. (1985). Alternative instructional systems and the development of problem-solving skills. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 253–261.

Bischoff, P. J. (1999). The development of ideational networks, systemic knowledge, and application abilities in preservice elementary teachers who studied a laboratory unit on ecology. Georgia Journal of Science, 57(3), 210–223.

Bischoff, P. J. (2006). The role of knowledge structures in the ability of preservice elementary teachers to diagnose a child’s understanding of molecular kinetics. Science Education, 90(5), 936–951.

Bischoff, P. J., & Anderson, O. R. (1998). A case study analysis of the development of knowledge schema, ideational networks, and higher cognitive operations among high school students who studied ecology. School Science and Mathematics, 54(5), 228–237.

Bischoff, P. J., & Anderson, O. R. (2001). Development of knowledge frameworks and higher order cognitive operations among secondary school students who studied a unit on ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 81–88.

Bischoff, P. J., Avery, L., Golden, C. F., & French, P. (2010). An analysis of knowledge structure, diversity and diagnostic abilities among pre-service science teachers within the domain of oxidation and reduction chemistry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 411–429.

Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878.

Bretz, S. L. (2001). Novak’s theory of education: Human constructivism and meaningful learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1107.

Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students’ knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 53–66.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (14.baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

Chang, C-Y., Yeh, T-K., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2010). The positive and negative effects of science concept tests on student conceptual understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 265–282.

Chin-Chung, T., & Chao-Ming, H. (2001). Development of cognitive structures and information processing strategies of elementary school students learning about biological reproduction. Journal of Biological Education 36(1), 21–26.

Cracolice, M. S., Deming, J. C., & Ehlert, B. (2008). Concept learning versus problem solving: A cognitive difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 873–878.

Dhindsa, H. S., & Anderson, O. R. (2004). Using a conceptual-change approach to help preservice science teachers reorganize their knowledge structures for constructivist teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education 15(1), 63–85.

Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C.T. Fosnot, (Ed.). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice (pp. 3–7). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gunstone, R. F. (1980). Word association and the description of cognitive structure. Research in Science Education, 10(1), 45–53.

Howard, R. (1988). Schemata: Implications for teaching science. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 34, 29–34.

Jonassen, D. H. (1987). Assessing cognitive structure: Verifying a method using pattern notes. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(3), 1–14.

Karagöz Şahin, O. (2004). Deneyimli kimya öğretmenlerinin ve ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin modern atom teorisi konusunda bilişsel yapılarının ortaya çıkarılması (Yüksek lisans tezi, Balıkesir, Türkiye: Balıkesir Üniversitesi).

Lavendowski, C. (1981). Epistemology of a physics laboratory on electricity and magnetism (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University).

Mason D. S., Shell, D. F., & Crawley, F. E. (1997). Differences in problem solving by nonscience majors in introductory chemistry on paired algorithmic-conceptual problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 905–923.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Identifying conceptual students in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52–55.

Nakhleh M. B., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 190–192.

Novak, J. D. (1977). An alternative to Piagetian psychology for sciences and mathematics education. Science Education, 61(4), 453–477.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625–645.

Oskay, Ö. Ö., & Dinçol, S. (2011). The effects of internet-assisted chemistry applications on prospective chemistry teachers’ cognitive structure. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 927–931.

Oskay, Ö. Ö., Temel, S., Özgür, S. D., & Erdem, E. (2012). Determination of preservice chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures via flow map method and their knowledge level on “greenhouse gases and their effects” topic. Eurasian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 4(1), 30–45.

Pendley, B. D., Bretz, R. L., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Concept map as a tool to assess learning in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(1), 9–15.

Pickering, M. (1990). Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 254–255.

Sawrey, B. A. (1990). Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 253–254.

Selvi, M., & Yakışan, M. (2005). Akış haritaları yoluyla öğrencilerin bilişsel yapılarının belirlenmesi: Ekolojik döngüler. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(1), 46–55.

Shavelson, R. J. (1972). Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 225–234.

Shavelson, R. J. (1974). Methods for examining representations of a subject matter structure in a student’s memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 231–249.

Snow, R. E. (1989). Toward assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning. Educational Research, 18(9), 8–14.

Temel, S., & Özcan, Ö. (2016). The analysis of prospective chemistry teachers' cognitive structure: the subject of covalent and ionic bonding. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 1953-1969.

Tsai, C. C. (1998). An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders’ science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 413–425.

Tsai, C. C. (2000). The effects of STS-oriented instruction on female tenth graders’ cognitive structure outcomes and the role of student scientific epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 22(10), 1099–1115.

Tsai, C. C. (2001). Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27(3), 257–268.

Tsai, C. C., & Huang, C. M. (2001). Development of cognitive structures and information processing strategies of elementary school students learning about biological reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 21–26.

Tsai, C. C., & Huang, C. M. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structure in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163–169.

Valanides, N., Nicolaidou, A., & Eilks, I. (2003). Twelfth grade students’ understanding of oxidation and combustion: Using action research to improve teachers’ practical knowledge and teaching practice. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 59–175.

Zhou, Q., Wang, T., & Zheng, Q. (2015). Probing high school students’ cognitive structures and key areas of learning difficulties on ethanoic acid using a flow map method. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 16, 589–602.

 

 


Copyright (C) 2016 EdUHK APFSLT. Volume 17, Issue 2, Article 18 (Dec., 2016). All Rights Reserved.