What should educational reform in Indonesia look like? - Learning from the PISA science scores of East-Asian countries and Singapore

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Berry, R. (2011). Assessment reforms around the world. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education, policy and practice (pp. 89-102). Dordrecht: Springer.

Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, (21)1, 33–46, doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9.

Broadfoot, P. (2007). An introduction to assessment. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Brown, N., & Beswick, K. (2014). Policy and curriculum research in the context of change. In N. Fitzalen, et al. (Eds.), The future of educational research, perspective for beginning researchers (pp. 3-11). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

CDT, China Digital Time. (2013). Do Shanghai’s PISA scores reflect Chinese education? Retrieved from http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2013/12/shanghais-pisa-scores-reflect-chinese-education/. Accessed at May 17, 2015.

CMEC. (2015). PISA 2015. Canada: The council of Ministers of Education. Retrieved from: http://cmec.ca/508/Programs-and-Initiatives/Assessment/Programme-for-International-Student-Assessment-(PISA)/PISA-2015/index.html.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world of education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.

Dharma, S. (2014). Tragedi nol buku: Tragedi di dunia pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from: http://satriadharma.com/2014/01/28/tragedi-nol-buku-tragedi-di-dunia-pendidikan-indonesia/.

Driskell, N. (2014). Global perspectives: Explaining Taiwan’s dramatic improvement in PISA reading. Washington, DC: NCEE (National Center on Education and The Economy). Retrieved from http://www.ncee.org/2014/10/global-perspectives-explaining-taiwans-dramatic-improvement-in-pisa-reading/.

Fensham, P. J. (2013). International assessments of science learning: Their positive and negative contributions to science education. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 11-31). Dordrecht: Springer.

Muhaimin, S. A., & Ali, N. (2001). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam: Upaya Mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Ng, E. H. (2008). Educational reform on Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5-15.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2012). Lesson from PISA for Japan, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2013a). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem-solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2013b). PISA 2015: Draft science framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2014a). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2014b). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa.

Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff , H. G., & Cowen, R. (2011). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Quek, C. G., & Tan, L. S. (2013). How does Singapore foster the development of innovators?. In L. V. Shavinina (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 590-603). New York: Routledge.

Raihani. (2007). Education reforms in Indonesia in the twenty-first century. International Education Journal, 8(1), 172–183.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socio-scientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921.

Slate. (2012). Let’s copy how Finland, South Korea, and Canada teach science: Lessons from teachers whose countries excel at science education. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/06/teachers_from_finland_ south_korea_and_canada_on_science_education_.html.

Suharti. (2013). Trend in education in Indonesia. In D. Suryadharma & G. W. Jones (Eds.), Education in Indonesia (pp. 15-52). Singapore: ISEAS (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).

Suprapto, N. (2016). Students' attitudes towards STEM education: Voices from Indonesian junior high school. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special Issue), 75-87.

Suprapto, N., & Pai, Y-F. (2015). Promoting science centers by using MOOCs: Model for communicating informal science education. Man in India, 95(4), 1005-1012.

Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lesson on achievement educational success. Singapore: Springer.

The China Post. (2015). Taiwan placed 4th in OECD global education ranking. Retrieved from:http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2015/05/14/435999/Taiwan-placed.htm .

Tsai, C.-C., Wu, Y.-T., Lin, Y.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2011). Research regarding science learning in Asia: An analysis of selected science education journals. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 352-363.

UNDP. (2014). Human development report 2014: Indonesia. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/IDN.pdf.

Yung, B. H. W. (2006). Assessment reform in science, fairness, and fear. Dordrecht: Springer.

Zhao, J. (2011). Towards sustainable cities in China: Analysis and assessment of some Chinese cities in 2008. New York: Springer.