Investigating the effectiveness of an active learning based-interactive conceptual instruction (ALBICI) on electric field concept

Allain, R. (2001). Investigating the relationship between student difficulties with the concept of electric potential and the concept of rate of change (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.ncsu.edu/per/Articles/AllainDissertation.pdf (7 October 2015)

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2005). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Aufschnaiter, C.V. (2006). Process based investigations of conceptual development: an explorative study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 689-725.

Aydin, S. (2012). Remediation of misconception about geometric optics using conceptual change texts. Journal of Education Research and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 001-012.

Barman, C. R. (1997). Students’ views of scientists and school science. Engaging K-* teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 43-54.

Başer, M. (2006). Fostering conceptual change by cognitive conflict based instruction on students’ understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96-114.

Berti, A. E., Barbetta, V., & Toneatti, L. (2015). Third-graders’ conceptions about the origin of species before and after instruction: an exploratory study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Advance online publish, doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9679-5

Bonwell, C.C., and J. A. Eison. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Boujaoude, S. B., & Jurdak, M. E. (2010). Integrating physics and math through microcomputer-based laboratories (MBL): effects on discourse type, quality, and mathematization. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 1019-1047.

Buckley, C. A., Pitt, E., Norton, B., & Owens, T. (2010). Students’ approaches to study, conceptions of learning and judgements about the value of networked technologies. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 55–65.

Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961.

Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R. K. (2011). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 1-28.

Cambell, C. & Monk, S. (2015). Introducing a learner response system to pre-service education students: Increasing student engagement. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(1) 25–36.

Can, H. B., & Boz, Y. (2014). Structuring cooperative learning for motivation and conceptual change in the concepts of mixtures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Advance online publish, doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9602-5

Chang, K. E., Lin, M. L., & Chen, S. W. (1998). Application of Socratic dialogue on corrective learning of subtraction. Computers & Education, 31(1), 55–68.

Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., Wang, K. Y., & Dai, C. Y. (2003). Web_soc: A socratic-dialectic-based collaborative tutoring system on the world wide web. IEEE Transaction on Education, 46(1), 69–78.

Chang, K. E., Wang, K. Y., Dai, C. Y., & Sung, Y. T. (1999). Learning recursion through a collaborative Socratic dialectic process. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(3), 303–315.

Chen, Y.-L., Pan, P.-R., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Correcting Misconceptions on Electronics: Effects of a simulation based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 212–227.

Cheng, M. F., Lin, J. L., Chang, Y. C., Li, H. W., Wu, T.Y., & Lin, D. M. (2014). Developing explanatory models of magnetic phenomena through models of magnetic phenomena through model based inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 351-360.

Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 33–49.

Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182.

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.

Coştu, B. (2008). Learning science through the PDEODE teaching Strategy: helping students make sense of everyday Situations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 3-9.

Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 5-16.

Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. Instructional Science, 40(1), 47-67.

Coştu, B.Ayas, Niaz, Unal, Calik, (2007). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of boiling concept. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(6), 524-536.

Dass, P. M. (2005). Understanding the nature of scientific enterprise (NOSE) through a discourse with its history: the influence of an undergraduate ‘history of science’ course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 87–115.

Dega, B.G. (2012). Conceptual change through cognitive perturbation using simulations in electricity and electricity: a case study in Ambo University Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/9901/thesis_bekele%20gashe%20dega.pdf?sequence=1 (7 October 2015)

Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B., & Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Physical review special Topics-Physics education research, 2(1), 101-105.

Dori, Y.J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electroelectricity concepts?. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.

Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2009). Talking physics during small-group work with context-rich problems - analysed from an ownership perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 455-472.

Engström, S., Gustafsson, P., & Niedderer, H. (2010). Content for teaching sustainable energy systems in physics at upper secondary school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1281-1304.

Eryılmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001–1015.

Etherington, M. (2008). E-Learning pedagogy in the Primary School Classroom: the McDonaldization of Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(5), 29-54.

Fabry, D. L. (2010). Combining Research-based Effective Teacher Characteristics with Effective Instructional Strategies to Influence Pedagogy. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 3(1), 24-32.

Friege, G., & Lind, G. (2006). Types and qualities of knowledge and their relations to problem solving in physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 437-465.

Furio, C. & Guisasola, J. (1998). Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field. Science Education, 82(4), 511-526.

Galili, I. (1995). Mechanics background influences students’ conceptions in electromagnetism. International Journal of Science Education. 17(3), 371-387.

Goris, T., & Dyrenfurth, M. (2010). Students’ misconceptions in science, technology, and engineering. Retrieved from http://ilin.asee.org/Conference2012/Papers/Goris.pdf
Gunstone, R., & White, R. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291–299.

Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259–279.

Hébert, A & Hauf, P. (2015). Student learning through service learning: Effects on academic development, civic responsibility, interpersonal skills and practical skills. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(1), 37–49.

Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D., & Littig, P. (2010). University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 9–20.

Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Hwang, F. K. (2008). Fostering High School Students’ Conceptual Understandings About Seasons: The Design of a Technology-enhanced Learning Environment. Research in Science Education, 38, 127–147.

Jan Kock, Z., Taconis, R., Bolhuis, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). Creating a culture of inquiry in the classroom while fostering an understanding of theoretical concepts in direct current electric circuits: a balanced approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 45-69.

Kaczynski, D., Wood, L., Harding, A. (2008). Using radar charts with qualitative evaluation: Techniques to assess change in blended learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 23-41.

Karaçam, S. & Digilli Baran, A. (2015). The effects of field dependent/field independent cognitive styles and motivational styles on students’ conceptual understanding about direct current circuits. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2).

Kolari, S. & Savander-Ranne, C. (2004). Visualization promotes apprehension and comprehension. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 484-493.

Kutluay, Y. (2005). Diagnosis of eleventh grade students’ misconceptions about geometric optic by a three-tier test (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12606660/index.pdf (26 July 2015)

Leppavirta, J. (2011). Assessing undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding and confidence of electromagnetics.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1099-1117.

Liégeois L., Chasseigne G., Papin S., & Mullet E., (2003). Improving high school students’ understanding of potential difference in simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1129–1145.

Lin, J. W. (2015). Do skilled elementary teachers hold scientific conceptions and can they accurately predict the type and source of students’ preconceptions of electric circuits?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Advance online publish, doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9635-4.

Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students’ climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50-62.

Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Heuvelen, A. V. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and electricity, Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics Supplement, 69(7), s13-s23.

Meltzer, D. E., & Thornton, R. K. (2011). Resource Letter ALIP–1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics. American Journal of Physics, 80(6), 478-496.

Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 221–227.

Prestridge, S. (2014). A focus on students’ use of Twitter – their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(2) 101– 115.

Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Reed, M. J., Kennett, D. J., Lewis, T., & Lucas, E. L. (2011). The relative benefits found for students with and without learning disabilities taking a first-year university preparation course. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 133–142.

Safadi, R., & Yerushalmi, E. (2013). Problem solving vs. troubleshooting tasks: the case of sixth-grade students studying simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1341-1366.

Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2015). The PDEODEE students worksheet on static electricity: as innovation in learning sets of physics. Paper presented at the International Conference of Educational Research and Innovations, Yogyakarta.

Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Kaniawati, I., & Coştu, B. (2015). Fields Conceptual Change iIventory: a diagnostic test instrument on the electric field and magnetic field to diagnose students’ conceptions. International Journal of Industrial Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 3(12), 74-77.

Saunders, D., Brake, M., Griffiths, M., & Thornton, R. (2004). Access, astronomy and science fiction: A case study in curriculum design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 27–42.

Savander-Ranne, C., & Kolari, S. (2003). Promoting the conceptual understanding of engineering students through visualization. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 7(2), 189-199.

Shen, J., Liu, O. L., & Chang, H. Y. (2015). Assessing students’ deep conceptual understanding in physical sciences: an example on sinking and floating. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Advance online publish, doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9680-z.

Smith, C. M., & Sodano, T. M. (2011). Integrating lecture capture as a teaching strategy to improve student presentation skills through self-assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 151–162.

Smith, M. C. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25.

Srivastava, S., John O. P, Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041–1053.

Tornkvist, S., Pettersson, K., & Transtromer, G. (1993). Confusion by representation: On student’s comprehension of the electric field concept. American Journal of Physics, 61(4), 335-338.

Tuberty, D. M., Dass, P., & Windelspecht, M. (2011). Student understanding of scientific hypotheses, theories & laws: exploring the influence of a non-majors college introductory biology course. International Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 23-44.

Vatansever, O. (1991). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on overcome students’ misconceptions of electric field, electric potential and electric Potential Energy at tenth grade level (Masters’ thesis). Retrieved from https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12607920/index.pdf (26 July 2015)

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.