Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 16, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2015) |
Adar, L. (1969). A Theoretical Framework for the Study of Motivation in Education. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
Alamolhodaei, H. (1996). A Study in Higher Education Calculus and Students’ Learning Styles, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Glasgow.
Al-Naeme, F. F. A. (1991). The Influence of Various Learning Styles on Practical Problem Solving in Scottish Secondary Schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Glasgow University.
Ateş, S. (2005). The Effects Of Learning Cycle On College Students’ Understanding Of Different Aspects In Resistive DC Circuits. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 1-20.
Ateş, S. & Cataloglu, E. (2007). The Effects Of Students’ Cognitive Styles On Conceptual Understandings And Problem Solving Skills In Introductory Mechanics. Research in Science & Technology Education, 25, 167–178.
Bahar, M. & Hansell, M. H. (2000). The Relationship Between Some Psychological Factors And Their Effect On The Performance Of Grid Questions And Word Association Tests. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 20(3), 349-364.
Bahar, M. (2002). A Diagnostic Study of Biology Students’ Motivational Styles. Journal of Educational Faculty, 22(2), 23-34.
Bahar, M. (2003a). The Effect Of Instructional Methods On The Performance Of The Students Having Different Cognitive Styles. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 24, 26-32.
Bahar, M. (2003b). The Effects Of Motivational Styles On Group Work And Discussion-Based Seminars. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(4).
Başer, M. (2006). Effects of Conceptual Change and Traditional Confirmatory Simulations on Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Direct Current Circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5-6), 367- 381.
Başer, M. & Durmuş, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of Computer Supported Versus Real Laboratory Inquiry Learning Environments on the Understanding of Direct Current Electricity among Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 47–61.
Bennett, R. E. (1993). On The Meanings Of Constructed Response. In R. E. Bennett & W. C. Ward (Ed.), Construction Versus Choice In Cognitive Measurement Issues In Constructed Response, Performance Testing, And Portfolio Assessment (pp.1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chinien, C. A. & Boutin, F. (1992/1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An Important Learner Characteristics for Educational Technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21(4), 303-311.
Choi, K. & Chang, C. (2004). The Effects of Using the Electric Circuit Model in Science Education. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 44(6), 1341-1348.
Chiu, M. H. & Lin, J. W. (2005). Promoting Fourth graders' Conceptual Change Of Their Understanding Of Electric Current Via Multiple Analogies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 429-464.
Çataloğlu, E. & Ateş, S. (2014). The Effects Of Cognitive Styles On Naïve Impetus Theory Application Degrees Of Pre-Service Science Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 699-719.
Danili, E. & Reid, N. (2006). Cognitive Factors That Can Potentially Affect Pupils’ Test Performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 64-83.
Donnaruma, T., Cox, D. & Beder, H. (1980). Success In High School Completion Program And Its Relation to Field Dependence-Independence. Adult Education, 30(4), 222-232.
Dickstein, L. S. (1968). Field Dependence in Concept Attainment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 27, 635-642.
Duit, R. & von Rhöneck, C. (1998). Learning And Understanding Key Concepts Of Electricity. In A. Tiberghien, E.J. Jossem & J. Barajos (Eds.) Connecting Research In Physics Education With Teacher Education. International commission on physics education.
El-Banna, H. (1987). The Development of a Predictive Theory of Science Education Based Upon Information Processing Theory. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Glasgow.
Fehrenbach, C. (1994). Cognitive Styles Of Gifted And Average Readers. Roeper Review, 16(4), 290-292.
Engelhardt, P. & Beichner, R. (2004). Students’ Understanding Of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Forces. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115.
Eryılmaz, A. (2002). Effects Of Conceptual Assignments And Conceptual Change Discussions On Students’ Misconceptions And Achievement Regarding Force And Motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1001–1015.
Glass, G. & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical Methods in Education and Physchology (3rd edition). Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The Role of Individual Differences in Field Dependence as a Factor in Learning and Memory. Psychological Bulten, 83, 675-694.
Gray, J. A. (1981). A Biological Basis for the Sex Differences in Achievement in Science? In A. Kelly (Ed.), The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education. Manchester: Manhester University Press.
Green, K. (1985). Cognitive Style: A Review of the Literature. Chicago: Johnson O’ Connor Research Foundation.
Hammer, D. (1996). How Many Alternative Perspectives Of Cognitive Structure Influence Instructional Perceptions And Intentions? Journal of Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97-127.
Hofstein, A., & Kempa, R. F. (1985). Motivating Strategies In Science Education: Attempt At Analysis. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 221–229.
Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Naeme, F. F. A. (1995). Filling a Curriculum Gap In Chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 205-216.
Johnstone, A. H. (1997). Know How Your Pupils Learn, And Teach Them Accordingly. In D.L. Thompson (Ed.) Monitoring Change in Education: Science Education In The 21st Century. Hants: Arena.
Johnson, S. (1987) Gender Differences In Science: Parallels In Interest, Experience And Performance. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 467-481.
Jones, S. (1993). Cognitive Learning Styles: Dose Awareness Help? A Review of Selected Literature. Language Awareness, 2(4), 195-207.
Kapucu, S. & Yıldırım, U. (2013). Physics Teachers’ Beliefs About The Attainment Of Skill Objectives And The Extent Of These Beliefs’ Reflection On Teachers’ Instructional Practices. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 2(4), 10-22.
Karaçam, S. (2005). Determining the Conceptual Understanding Levels of High School Students’ Having Different Cognitive Styles on Major Concepts of Motion And Motion Laws by Using Different Assessment Techniques. MA Thesis,Abant Izzet Baysal University, Turkey.
Kelly, A. (1988). Sex Stereotypes and School Science, A Three-Year Follow-up. Educational Studies, 14, 151-163.
Kempa, R. F., & Diaz, M. M. (1990a). Students’ Motivational Traits and Preferences for Different Instructional Modes in Science Education, Part I: Students’ Motivational Traits. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 195–203.
Kempa, R. F. & Diaz, M. M. (1990b). Students’ Motivational Traits and Preferences for Different Instructional Modes in Science Education, Part II. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 205–216.
Leventhal, G. & Sisco, H. (1996). Correlations Among Field Dependence/ Independence Locus of Control, and Self Monitoring. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 604-606.
Lyall, R. K. & Johnstone, A. H. (1999). Communication: Computer Programs Which Respond to Learning Styles. University Chemistry Education, 3, 68-71.
Lyons-Lawrence, C. L. (1994). Effect of Learning Style on Performance in Using Computer-Based Instruction in Office Systems. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, XXXVI(3), 166-175.
Ministry of National Education (MONE) (2007). Grade 9 Turkish High School Physics Curriculum. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ program.aspx
O’Neil, H. F. Jr., & Brown, R. S. (1998). “Differential Effects of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect. Applied in Education, 11(4), 331-351.
Riding, R. J. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive Styles – an Overview and Integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Saracho, O. N. (1997). Teachers’ and Students’ Cognitive Styles in Early Childhood Education. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
Sarantopoulos, P. & Tsaparlis, G. (2004). Analogies in Chemistry Teaching as A Means of Attainment of Cognitive and Affectove Objectives: A Longitudinal Study in a Naturalistic Setting, Using Analogies with a Strong Social Content. Chemistry Education: Research And Practice, 5(1), 33-50.
Sencar, S. & Eryılmaz, A. (2004). Factors Mediating the Effect of Gender on Ninth-Grade Turkish Students’ Misconceptions Concerning Electric Circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603–616.
Solomon, J. (1996). Group Discussions in the Classroom. School Science Review, 72(26), 1-29.Taşlıdere, E. (2013). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Decreasing Their Misconceptions in DC Electric Circuits. Scientific Research Creative Education, 4(4), 273-282.
Treagust, D. & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual Change: A Discussion of Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Challenges for Science Education. Cult Stud Sci Educ., 3, 297–328.
Witkin, H. A., Goodenough, D. R., Moore, C. A., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implication. Review of Educatinal Research, 47, 1-64.
Witkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins Field Dependence and Field Independence. New York: International University Press, Inc.
Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and Combining Real and Virtual Experimentation:An Effort to Enhance Students' Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 20-132.
Zarotiadou, E. & Tsaparlis, G. (2000). Teaching Lower-Secondary Chemistry with a Piagetian Constructivist and an Ausbelian Meaningful-Receptive Method: A Longitudinal Comparison. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 37-50.
Ziane, M. (1990). The Application of Information Processing Theory to The Learning of Physics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow.
Copyright (C) 2015 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 16, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2015). All Rights Reserved.