Altering depth and complexity in the science curriculum for the gifted: results of an experiment

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Assouline, S. G., Blando C. A., Croft L. J., Baldus C. M., & Colangelo, N. (2009). Promoting excellence: Acceleration through enrichment. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2^nd, pp. 1-17). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(11), 1-19.

Betts, G. T. & Kercher J. J. (2009). The autonomous learner model for the gifted and talented. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2^nd ed., pp. 49-105). Mansfiled Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Borg, W. J., Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D. (1993). Applying Educational Research: A Practical Guide (3^rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.

Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R., & Wise, K. C. (1985). Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II [Abstract]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-177.

Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1996). Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review, 18(3), 212-217.

Carson (2004). A taxonomy of knowledge types for use in curriculum design. Interchange, 35(1), 59-79.

Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (7^th ed.). Upple Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall/Pearson.

Çakar, E. (2008). 5.sınıf fen ve teknoloji programının bilimsel süreç becerileri kazanımlarının gerçekleşme düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Süleyman Demirel, Isparta.

Davaslıgil, Ü., & Zeana, M. (2004). Üstün zekalıların eğitim projesi. In A. Kulaksızoğlu, & Bilgili, A. E. (Eds.). I. Türkiye üstün yetenekli çocuklar kongresi bildiriler kitabı (pp. 85-101). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.

Dodds, K. M. (2010). Effects of the prompts of depth and complexity on gifted and non-gifted students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Edwards, A. L. (1960). Statistical methods for behavioral sciences (2^nd ed.). New York, NY: Rinehart & Company, Inc.

Egan, K. (2010). Learning in Depth: A Simple Innovation That Can Transform Schooling. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Folk, S. (2006). Understanding understanding: a review of the literature. In K. Leithwood, P. McAdie, N. Bascia, & A. Rodrigue (Eds.), Teaching for deep understanding: what every educator should know (pp. 26-31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4^th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications(8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Geban, Ö., Aşkar, P. & Özkan, İ. (1992). Effects of computer simulation and problem solving approaches on high school [Abstract]. Journal of Educational Research, 86 (1), 5-10.

Grotzer, T. A. (2005). Transferring structural knowledge about the nature of causality to isomorphic and non-isomorphic topics. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1117424.files/GrotzerAERA05.pdf.

Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Haskell, R. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction and reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press A Harcourt Science and Technology Company.

Jensen, E., & Nickelsen, L. (2008). Deeper learning: 7 powerful strategies for in-depth and longer-lasting learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Jonassen, D. H., & Gabrowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kaplan, S. N. (2009). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2nd ed., pp. 235-253). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-324.

Lehrer, K. (2001). Theory of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Levent, F. (2011). Üstün yetenekli çocukların hakları. İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.

MoNE (Ministry of National Education). (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (4. ve 5. sınıflar) öğretim programı, Ankara: Government Printing Office.

Moon, S.M., Kollof, P., Robınson, A., Dixon, F. & Feldhusen, J. F. (2009). The purdue three-stage model. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2^nd ed., pp.289-323). Mansfiled Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Nuhoğlu, H. (2008). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik bir tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 627-639.

Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Lear. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (1989).Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.

Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating Complex Information. Learning Instruction, 12, 61-86.

Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). The schoolwide enrichment model: A focus on student strengths and interests. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2^nd ed., pp. 323-353). Mansfiled Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the centralized mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 1-22.

Sak , U. (2011). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları modeli (ÜYEP) ve sosyal geçerliliği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 213-229.

Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and explanation. NY: Oxford University Press.

Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003).New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo, & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 163-173). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Silverman, L. K. (1993). A developmental model for counseling the gifted. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 51-79). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.

Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1983). SMPY’s first decade: 10 years of posing problems and solving them. The Journal of Special Education, 17(1), 11-25.

Taylor, M. C. (2003). The moment of complexity: Emerging network culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Tokotro, M., & Steels, L. (2004). A learning zone of one’s own: sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments. Washington, DC: IOS Press.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2009). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented, (2^nd ed., pp. 571-599). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative learning Press.

Tomlinson C. A., & Jarvıs, J. M. (2000). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning and instruction. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2^nd ed., pp. 599-629). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. ( 2001). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning. Mahwah. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kester, & L., Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 343-352.

Van Merrienboer,J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5-13.

Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller , J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3^rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Wood S. M. (2009). The integrated curriculum model. In S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Erkert & C.A. Little (Eds.). Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2^nd ed., pp. 659-693). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.