Active learning applications in the history of chemistry: Pre-service chemistry teachers’ level of knowledge and views

Aydede, M.N., & Matyar, F. (2009). The effect of active learning approach in science teaching on cognitive level of student achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 115-127.

Allen, E. E. (1995). Active learning and teaching: Improving post-secondary library instruction. Reference Librarian, 51/52, 89-103.

Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. (ERIC Number: ED340272).

Bayrakçeken, S., Canpolat, N., & Çelik, S. (2011). The nature of chemistry and teaching, Paper presented at the II. National Chemistry Education Congress 5-8 June 2011, Erzurum, Turkey.

Coştu, B., Ünal, S., & Ayas, A. (2007). A hands-on activity to promote conceptual change about mixtures and chemical compounds, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 35–46.

Fayombo, G.A. (2012). Active learning: Creating excitement and enhancing learning in a changing environment of the 21st century. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(16), 107 – 128. Doi:10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n16p107

Fies, C. (2005). Classroom response systems: What do they add to an active learning environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation The University of Texas, Austin, TX.

Grace, A. F. (2012). Active learning strategies and student learning outcomes among some university students in Barbados. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(9), 70-90.

Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results and experiences from the european HIPST Project. Science & Educaton, 21, 1233–1261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9330-3.

Herron, J. D. (1975). High school forum. Journal of Chemical Education, 52(2), 179–180.

Jansen, W.(1995).Das historisch-problemorientierte unterrichtsverfahren einforschungsprojekt [The historical problem-centered conception – A Research Project]. In Günter-Arndt, H., & Raapke, H.G. (Eds.), Revision der Lehrerbildung. Oldenburg: Zentrum für padagogische Berufspraxis.

Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (1999). History and philosophy of science through models: The case of chemical kinetics. Science & Education, 8, 287-307.

Jensen, W. B. (2011) Why study history of chemistry. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, 29, 4-7.

Janes, B. (2004). On the shoulders of giants. Science Scope, 28(3), 36–37.

Karamustafaoğlu, S., Coştu, B., & Ayas, A. (2006). Turkish chemistry teachers’ views about an implementation of active learning approach in their lessons. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1).

Kalem,S., & Fer, S. (2003). The effects of the active learning model on students’ learning, teaching and communication. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(2), 455-461.

Kalof, L., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2008). Essentials of Social Research. Open University Press: Berkshire, England

Kubli, F. (2005). Mit geschichten und erzahlungen motivieren [Motivating with stories and narratives]. Köln: Aulis Verlag Deubner.

Lin, H. S., Hung, J. Y., & Hung, S. C. (2002). Using the history of science to promote students’ problem-solving ability. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 453–464.

Matuschek, C., & Jansen, W. (1985). Chemieunterricht und geschichte der chemie. [Chemistry education and the history of chemistry]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften Chemie, 24(2), 3–7.

McKinney, D., & Michalovic, M. (2004). Teaching stories of scientists and their discoveries. Science Teacher, 71(9), 46–51.

Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMıllan, M., Clough, M., & Olson, J. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Science & Education, 16(3), 13–334.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Mulongo, G. (2013). Effect of active learning teaching methodology on learner participation. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (4),157-168.

National Research Council (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: a handbook. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.

Niaz, M., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2000). Teaching chemistry as rhetoric of conclusions or heuristic principles - a history and philosophy of science perspective. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe. 1 (3), 315 – 322. Niaz, M., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2001). Do we have to ıntroduce history and philosophy of science or is it already ‘ınside’ chemistry? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 59 – 164.

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Relational perspectives on higher education teaching and learning in the sciences. Studies in Science Education, 33, 31-60.

Quilez, J. (2004). A historical approach to the development of chemical equilibrium through the evolution of the affinity concept: some educational suggestions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(1), 69-87.

Özgelen, S., & Öktem, Ö. (2013). Preservice science teachers’ development of knowledge about history of science during the nature and history of science course. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9 (1),11-23.

Sanchez, P. J., & Martín, F. (2003). Quantum vs. “classical” chemistry in university chemistry education: A case study of the role of history in thinking the curriculum. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4, 131-148.

Şesen, B.A., & Tarhan, L. (2011). Active-learning versus teacher-centered instruction for learning acids and bases. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(2), 205–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.581630.

Scheffel, L., Brockmeier, W., & Parchmann, I. (2009). Historical Material in Macro– Micro Thinking: Conceptual Change in Chemistry Education and the History of Chemistry. In J.K. Gilbert, D. Treagust (eds.), Multiple Representations in Chemical Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education 4 (pp 215-250), Springer. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978- 1-4020-8872-8 11.

Sivan, A., Leung, R. W., Woon, C.C., & Kember, D. (2000). An implementation of active learning and its affect on quality of student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 381-389.

Sivan, A., Leung, R. W., Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1991). Towards more active learning in hospitality studies. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 10, 369-379.

Şimşek, L. C. (2011). The effect of student studies in the nature and history of science lesson to the level of the knowledge about history of science. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 116-138.

Tural, G. (2012). Gains of physics teacher candidates in history of science course conducted by research and discussion approaches. The Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 1(1), 52-67.

Wandersee, J. H. (1992). The historicality of cognition: Implications for science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 423-34.

Wandersee, J. H., & Griffard, P.B. (2002). The history of chemistry: Potential and actual contributions to chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert et al (eds). Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice (pp 29-49), Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/0-306-47977-X_2

Wang, H.A., & Cox-Petersen, A.M. (2002). A comparison of elementary, secondary and student teachers’ perceptions and practices related to history of science instruction, Science& Education, 11, 69-81.