 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 15, Issue 2, Article 6 (Dec., 2014) |
Abd-El-Khalick, F. and BouJaoude, S. (1997) An explanatory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673–699.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 665-701.
Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F.S., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.
Akerson, V. L. & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching Nature of Science through Inquiry: Results of a 3-Year Professional Development Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (5), 653-680.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making in science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87 (3), 352-377.
BouJaoude, S. (1996). Epistemology and sociology of science according to Lebanese educators and students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 31 March–3 April, St. Louis, MO.
Bowden, J., Dall’Alba, G., Martin, E., Laurillard, D., Marton, F., Master, G., Ramsden, P., Stephanau, A. and Walsh, E. (1992), Displacement, velocity, and Frames of reference: Phenonemographic studies of students’ understanding and some implications for teaching and assessment. American Journal of Physics, 60 (3), 262 – 269.
Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? University of Queensland Press, Queensland, Australia.
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches that Stimulate Productive Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815-843.
Choi, J. (2004). “The Nature of Science”: An activity for the first day of class. Retrieved September 2008 from Summer Research Program for Science Teachers, Sleepy Hollow High School, Westchester, NY web site: http://www.scienceteacherprogram.org/genscience/Choi04.html
Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science and Education, 15, 263-494.
Crumb, G.H. (1965). Understanding of science in high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 246–250.
Haidar, A. H. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers' views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (8), 807-882.
Horner, J. & Rubba, P. (1979). The laws-are-mature-theories fable. The Science Teacher, 46 (2),31.
Jungwirth, E. (1970). An evaluation of the attained development of the intellectual skills needed for understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry by BSCS pupils in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 141–151.
Rudherford, F. J. & Ahlgren, A. (1991). Science for All Americans: Project 2061. Oxford University Press, USA
Kalman, C. (2010). Enabling students to develop a scientific method. Science and Education, 19, 147-163.
Khishfe, R. (2008). The Development of Seventh Graders’ Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (4), 470–496.
Larochelle, M.& Désautels, J. (1991). The epistemological turn in science education: the return of the actor. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F. & Niedderer, H. (eds) Research in physics learning: theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 155-175). Kiel, ALL : Institute for Science Education.
Lederman, N.G. (2007). Pedagogy and the practice of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (7), 931-934.
Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education. New Jersey: Erlbaum Publishers.
Lederman, J.S., & Khisfe, R. (2002). Views of the nature of science, Form D. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: An intervention study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1 (2), 135–160.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 331-360.
Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: development, use, and sources of change. Science Education,74 (2), 225- 239.
Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. InW. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mackay, L. D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8 (1), 57 – 66.
Matkins, J. J., Bell, R., Irving, K., & McNall, R. (2002). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Matson, J. O. & Parsons, S. (2006). Misconceptions about the nature of science, inquirybased instruction, and constructivism: creating confusion in the science classroom. Electronic Journal of Literacy through Science, 5 (6).
McComas, W. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Meichtry,Y.J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389–407.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). California, USA: Sage Publications.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ornek, F. (2008). An overview of a theoretical framework of phenomenography in qualitative education research: An example from physics education research. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9 (2).
Patton, M. Q. (1992). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). California, USA: Sage Publications.
Pomeroy, D. (1993) Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of scienc: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 261–278.
Rubba, P. A., Homer, J. K., & Smith, J. M. (1981). A Study of Two Misconceptions About the Nature Of Science Among Junior High School Students. School Science and Mathematics, 81 (3), 221-226.
Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1991). Science for all Americans (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Seung, E., Bryan, L. A., & Butler, M. B. B. (2009). Improving Preservice Middle Grades Science Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science Using Three Instructional Approaches. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 157-177.
Trent, J. (1965). The attainment of the concept ‘‘understanding science’’ using contrasting physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 224–229.
Van Zee, E. H. & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 229-271.
Welch, W.W., & Walberg, H.J. (1972). A national experiment in curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 373–383.
