 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 15, Issue 2, Article 5 (Dec., 2014) |
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986). Teaching in laboratories. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education & NFER-Nelson.
Chang, K. E., Chen, Y. L., Lin, H. Y., & Sung, Y. T. (2008). Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1486-1498.
Chauvot, J. B. (2008). Curricular knowledge and the work of mathematics teacher educators. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 83-99.
Clark, D., & Jorde, D. (2004). Helping students revise disruptive experientially supported ideas about thermodynamics: Computer visualizations and tactile models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 1-23.
Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69.
Dawkins, K. R., Dickerson, D. L., McKinney, S. E., & Butler, S. (2008). Teaching density to middle school students: Preservice science teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical practices. Clearing House, 82(1), 21-26. Dejong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. ET Magazine, 42(1), 5-13. Retrieved on 24th March 2013 from http://bookstoread.com/etp/earle.pdf
Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707-2711.
Foti, S., & Ring, G. (2008). Using a simulation-based learning environment to enhance learning and instruction in a middle school science classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(1), 103-120.
Gardner, D. E. (1977). Five evaluation frameworks: Implications for decision making in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(5), 571-593.
Geban, O., Askar, P., & Ozkan, I. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 5-10.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 791-806.
Hanif, M., Sneddon, P. H., Al-Ahmadi, F. M., & Reid, N. (2009). The perceptions, views and opinions of university students about physics learning during undergraduate laboratory work. European Journal of Physics, 30(1), 85-96.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115-135.
Jang, S. J., & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564.
Kanuka, H. (2006). Instructional design and e-learning: A discussion of pedagogical content knowledge as a missing construct. The e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9(2). Retrieved on 24th March 2013 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol9_no2/papers/full_papers/kanuka.pdf
Kent, P. (2006). Using interactive whiteboards to enhance mathematics teaching. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 11(2), 23-26.
Kiray, S. A., & Kaptan, F. (2012). The effectiveness of an integrated science and mathematics programme: Science-centred mathematics-assisted integration. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 943-956.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762.
Lee, J. (1999). Effectiveness of computer-based instructional simulation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 71-85.
Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 837-858.
Lunetta, N. V., & Tamir, P. (1981). An analysis of laboratory activities: Project physics and PSSC. School Science and Mathematics, 81(8), 635-642.
Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427-462.
McCrory-Wallace, R. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.
McEwan, H., & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316-324.
Millar, R., Le Mare´Chal, J. F., & Tiberghien, A. (1999). ‘Mapping’ the domain: Varieties of practical work. In J. Leach & A. C. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical work in science education (pp. 33-59). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Monaghan, J., & Clement, J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulations for understanding relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 921-944.
Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education /online/. Retrieved on 24th March 2013 from http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME154.pdf
Piccolo, D. (2008). Views of content and pedagogical knowledges for teaching mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 108(2), 46-48.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105.
Schmidt, D., Baran Sahin, E., Thompson, A., & Seymour, J. (2008). Developing effective technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in PreK-6 teachers. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5313-5317). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
Sun, K., Lin, Y., & Yu, C. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1411-1422.
Vacirca, E. (2008). How do teachers develop their technological pedagogical content knowledge in the context of system-wide pedagogical and curriculum reform? AARE 2008 International Education Research Conference – Brisbane, Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/08pap/vac08335.pdf
Vannatta, R. A., & Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 132-148.
Willis, J., & Mehlinger, H. D. (1996). Information technology and teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 978-1029). New York: Macmillan,.
Zacharia, Z. C. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 792-823.
Zacharia, Z. C. (2005). The impact of interactive computer simulations on the nature and quality of postgraduate science teachers’ explanations in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1741-1767.
Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1021-1035.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.
