 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 15, Issue 1, Article 3 (Jun., 2014) |
AAAS (1993). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061, Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Abd-El-Khalick. F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7),665- 701.
Abd-El Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785 – 810.
Abd-EL-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2009). The Influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184.
Akerson, V. L, Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295 – 317.
Akerson, V.L., Buck, A.G., Donnelly, L.A., Nargund-Joshi, V. & Weiland, I.S. (2001). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education Technology, 20, 537–549.
Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194–213.
Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching Nature of Science Explicitly in a First-Grade Internship Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394.
Akerson, V. L. & Hanuscin D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680.
Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L., & Cullen, T. A. (2007). The influence of guided inquiry and explicit instruction on K–6 teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 751–772.
Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A. & Hanson, D. L. (2010). Experienced teachers’ strategies for assessing nature of science conceptions in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 723–745.
Anderson, R. (2007). Thematic content analysis: Descriptive presentation of qualitative data. (Unpublished manuscript). http://www.wellknowingconsulting.org/publications/articles.html. Available at: 08th June 2012.
Aranson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The qualitative report 2, No. 1. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html Available at: 08th June 2012.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: a follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563–581.
Buaraphan, K., & Sung-Ong, S. (2009). Thai pre-service science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-22.
Chin, C.-C. (2005). First-year pre-service teachers in Taiwan—do they enter the teacher program with satisfactory scientific literacy and attitudes toward science? International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1549 1570.
Çelik, S., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2006). The effect of a science, technology and society course on prospective teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science, Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 255–273.
Dawkins, K. R., & Dickerson, D. L. (2003). Students’ conceptions regarding scientific theories. Paper presented in March at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching in Philadelphia, PA.
Doğan, N., Çakıroğlu, J., Bilican, K., & Çavuş, S. (2009). Nature of science and its instruction (1st Edition). Ankara: Pegema Publishing.
Freeday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1).
İrez, S. (2006). Are We Prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113-1143.
Karakaş, M. (2009). Cases of science professors’ use of nature of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 101–119.
Kang, S., Scharman, L.C., Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: result from korean 6th, 8th and 10th graders. Science Education, 89, 314–334.
Kattoula, E., Verma, G., & Martin-Hansen, L. (2009). Fostering preservice teachers’ “nature of science” understandings in a physics course. Journal of College Science Teaching, September/October, 18- 26.
Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl L. R. & Yeary, S. A. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: a case study of third and fourth grade student’ developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299-1324.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.
Khisfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Education, 45(4), 470-496.
Küçük, M. (2006). A study intended for teaching of science to the 7th grade students. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey.
Küçük, M. (2008). Improving preservice elementary teachers' views of the nature of science using explicit-reflective teaching in a science, technology and society course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 16-40.
Lawrence, J. (2010). The Factors that influence adoption and usage decision in SMEs: evaluating interpretive case study research in information systems. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(1), 51 - 62.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured Science: activities that promote understanding of nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (p.83-26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lederman, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Lederman, N. G. (2006). Research on nature of science: reflections on the past, anticipations of the future. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1-11.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Abell, S. & Lederman, N. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Liu, S-Y., & Tsai, C-C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1055–1073.
Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771- 790.
Myers, M. D. (1998). Exemplifying interpretive research in information systems: an overview. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 233-234.
Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
NRC (1996). National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press. Washington D.C.
National Science Teachers Association (2000). NSTA position statement: the nature of science.
Rannikmae, A., Rannikmae, M., & Holbrook, J. (2006). The nature of science as viewed by nonscience undergraduate students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2, 77–85.
Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J. S., Matthews, L., & Liu, S-Y. (2002). Explicit/Reflective Instructional Attention to Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: Impact on Student Learning, Proceedings of Annual International Conference of the Association for The Education of Teachers in Science, January 10-13, Charlotte North Carolina.
Smith, C. P. (Ed.). (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tao, P-K. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students’ understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 147–171.
Veal, W. R. (2004). Neandertals, naivete and the nature of science, a preliminary investigation of the impact of historical case-based pedagogy for science teachers. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6(1), 69–80.
Copyright (C) 2014 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 15, Issue 1, Article 3 (Jun., 2014). All Rights Reserved.