 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 15, Issue 1, Article 4 (Jun., 2014) |
Arons, A.B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Benson, H. (1996). University Physics (Revised Edition). Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
Chang, W. (2006). How may students fail to learn from textbooks? Critiques of Newton’s First Law. CD Rom Proceedings of the 2006 National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual International Conference. San Francisco, USA, 3-7 April, 2006.
Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J.D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66–71.
Coelho, R.L. (2007). The Law of Inertia: How understanding its history can improve physics teaching. Science & Education, 16, 955–974.
Cohen, B., & Whitman, A. (1999). Isaac Newton: The Principia mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dellian, E. (1998). Inertia, The innate force of matter: A legacy from Newton to modern physics, In. P. Scheurer, & G. Debrock, (Eds.) Newton’s scientific and philosophical legacy (pp. 227–238). London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Driver, R., Asoko, H. Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Freier, G., & Anderson, F. (1981). A demonstration handbook for physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.
Galili, I., & Tseitlin, M. (2003). Newton's First Law: Text, translations, interpretations and physics education. Science & Education, 12(1), 45–73.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2005).Fundamentals of physics, 7th Ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hewitt, P.G. (1998). Conceptual Physics (8th ed.). New York: Addison Wisley Longman.
Hudson, H. (1988). The most obvious explanation is not always correct. The Physics Teacher, 26(1), 34.
Jones, E., & Childers, R. (2001). Contemporary college physics, 3rd Ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Knight, R. (2004). Physics for scientists and engineers. San Francisco: Addison Wisley.
Larkin, J.H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner, & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp.75–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Niles, E.R., (1985). More to it than inertia. The Physics Teacher, 23(6), 334.
Reif, F. (1995). Understanding basic mechanics. New York: Wiley.
Sawicki, M. (1996). What’s wrong in the nine most popular texts? The Physics Teacher, 34(3), 147–149.
Schecker, H.P. (1992). The paradigmatic change in mechanics: Implications of historical processes for physics education. Science & Education, 1, 71–76.
Steinberg, M.S., Brown, D.E., & Clement, J. (1990). Genius is not immune to persistent misconceptions: conceptual difficulties impeding Isaac Newton and contemporary physics students. International Journal of Science Education, 12 (3), 265–273.
Sutton, C. (1996). The scientific model as a form of speech. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds), Research in Science Education in Europe: Current Issue and Themes (pp. 125–133). Washington, D.C. : Falmer Press.
Viennot, L. (2001). Reasoning physics: The role of common sense. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Westfall, R.S. (1971). Force in Newton’s physics. London: Macdonald.
Westfall, R.S. (1980). Never at rest: A biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitrow, G. (1971). The laws of motion. The British Journal for the History of Science, 5(19), 217–234.
