Thai pre-service science teachers' practice of science communication in communities

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans Online. Available: http://www.project2061.org, November 11, 2012.

Anderson, D., J. Kisiel and M. Storksdieck. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator, 49(3), 365-386.

Bouillion, L. M. and L. M. Gomez. (2001). Connecting School and Community with Science Learning: Real World Problems and School-Community Partnerships as Contextual Scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878-898.

Bowater, L. and Yeoman, K. (2013) Science Communication a Practical Guide for Scientist. Oxford.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Burns, T. W., D. J. O’ Conner, and S. M. Stocklmayer. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183-202.

Butkatunyoo, O. and S. Pitiporntapin, (2013). Scientist in Thai new graduate pre-service science teachers’ views. Presented at EASE 2013: The Third International Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education. Organized by The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong, China, July 4-6, 2013.

Charunrochana J. (2005). Introduction to Linguistics. 1st ed. Kasetsart University Press.

Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial Environmental Issues: A Case Study for the Professional Development of Science Teachers. International Journal of Science Education 24(11): 1191-1200.

Gross, A. G. (1994). The Roles of Rhetoric in the Public Understanding of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 3(1), 3-23.

Institute for Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2002). The Manual of Science Learning Management under the Basic Education Curriculum B.E. 2544. Bangkok: Karusapa Press.

Jackson, W. (1995). Methods: Doing Social Research. Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., Scarborough, Ontario.

Justin, R. and J. K. Gilbert. (1999). “A Case of Ahistorical Science Teaching: The Use of Hybrid Models”. Science Education, 83(2), 163-178.

Kortland, K. (1996). An STS Case Study about Students’ Decision Making on the Waste Issue. Science Education, 80(6), 673-689.

Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Luhmann, N. (1990). What is communication?. Communication Theory, 2(3), 251-259.

Malmfors, B., P. Garnsworthy and M. Grossman. (2000). Writing and Presenting Scientific Papers. Nottingham: The Cromwell Press, Trowbridge.

McCallie, E., L. Bell, T. Lohwater, J. H. Falk, J.L. Lehr, B.V. Lewenstein, C. Needham, and B. Wiehe. (2009). Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Information Science Education. Washington: Centre for Advancement of Informal Science Education.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

National of Statistical Office (NSO). (2006). Reading of Thai People. Statistics Newsletter, 17(8), 4-6.

National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Educational Standards. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

Ngamkeeree, S. (2006). Solving science learning problems using Science-Technology-Society approach for classroom research. Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 34-42.

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory and Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge: 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Online. Available: www.ncrel.org/engauge, June 31, 2012.

Office of the National Education Commission (ONEC). (2003). National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and Amendments (Second National Education Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Bangkok: Pimdeekanpim Co., Ltd. (in Thai).

Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP). (2004). Thailand’s Biodiversity (Online).
http://www.chm-thai.onep.go.th/Publication/ThaiBiodiv/ThailandBiodiversity_eng.pdf, January 6, 2008.

Osborne, J. (2000). “Science for Citizenship”. In Osborne, J. and Monk, M. Good practice in science teaching: what research has to say. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Phungamdee S. (2003). Opinions on Advertisement via Television for the Sake of Anti-Drug Addiction Campaign among the Youth: A Case Study of University Youth in the Eastern Region of Thailand. Research Report. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.

Piano K., A. Khahakitkoson, A. Attanatwong, and A. Chaisangjan. (2011). Language and Communication. 2nd eds. Bangkok. Language Textbook-Inception Project no. 5. Department of Eastern Languages, Faculty of Archaeology, Silpakorn University.

Pillay, H. (2002). Teacher Development for Quality Learning: The Thailand Education Reform Project. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

Pitiporntapin, S. (2013). Developing thai pre-service science teachers’ teaching competencies for science communication by reflection. Presented at EASE 2013: The Third International Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education. Organized by The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong, China, July 4-6, 2013.

Sadler, T.D. and D. L. Zeidler. (2003). Weighing in on genetic engineering and morality: Students reveal their ideas, expectations, and reservations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Philadelphia, PA. March 23-26, 2003 (Online) Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov.

Sing, T. (2007). Science and Technology for Development of Country (Online) Available: http:/www.jobpub.com/articles/showarticle.asp?id=1437, 12 December 2012.

Stocklmayer, S. M. (2001). “The background to effective science communication with the public”. In S. M. Stocklmayer et al. (eds.), Science Communication in Theory and Practice, 3-22.

Tadtasaai, R. (2004). Science Communication for People from Science Media Producer. Science, 58(6), 413-418.

Thai Communication Language Board. (2010). Thai Communication. 6th eds. Bangkok: Kasetsart University Press.

Tinnaluk Y. and C. Hemasiri, (2005). Science and Technology News Report in Textbook Series of Higher News and Edition No. 9, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open, editor. 1st ed. Nonthaburi. Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Press.

Tyler, R. (2002). Learning for Understanding in Science: Constructivism/Conceptual change Model in Science Teacher Education. Science Education, 80, 317-341.

Welgold, M., D.Treise, and P. Rausch (2007). “Science Communication Scholarship: Themes and Future Directions” in Melissa K. Welch-Ross and Lauren G. Fasig (eds.), Handbook on Communicating and Disseminating Behavioral Science, Sage Publications, Inc., London, 33-56.

Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model: Towards reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57.