The functioning of context-based physics instruction in higher education

Akpınar, M., & Tan, M. (2011, October). Unchangeability of attitude at 9th grade context-based physics course. Paper presented at the meeting of the First International Congress on Curriculum and Instruction, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Astin, C., Fisher, N., & Taylor, B. (2002). Finding physics in the real world: How to teach physics effectively with visits. Physics Education, 37(1), 18-24.

Barker, V., & Millar, R. (1999). Students’ reasoning about chemical reactions: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 645-665.

Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Students’ reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: what changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 22 (11), 1171- 1200.

Belt, S. T., Leisvik, M. J., Hyde, A. J., & Overton, T. L. (2005). Using a context-based approach to undergraduate chemistry teaching – a case study for introductory physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(3), 166-179.

Benckert, S. (2005). Context and conversation in physics education. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from http://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/18144/1/gupea_2077_18144_1.pdf

Brook, A. J., & Wells, P. (1988). Conserving the circus? An alternative approach to teaching and learning about energy. Physics Education, 23, 80-85.

Cahyadi, V. (2004). The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, Indonesia. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 455-464

Colicchia, G. (2005). Sit up straight! It’s good physics. Physics Education, 40, 365–369.

Colicchia, G. (2007). Vision of fish in air. Physics Education, 42(2), 189-192.

Colicchia, G. Waltner, C., Hopf, M., & Wiesner, H. (2009). The scallop’s eye-a concave mirror in the context of biology. Physics Education, 44(2), 175-179.

Cooper, S., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2003). Australian students’ views on nuclear issues: Does teaching alter prior beliefs? Physics Education, 38, 123–129.

Center for Occupational Research and Development (CORD). (1999). Teaching science contextually. Retrieved October 16, 2011, from http://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/Teaching_Science_Contextually.pdf

Demircioğlu, H., (2008). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarına yönelik maddenin halleri konusu ile ilgili bağlam temelli materyal geliştirilmesi ve etkililiğinin araştırılması. [Developing instructional materials about the topic of “States of Matter” based on the context based approach for primary student teachers and probing their effectiveness]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Techical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Duit, R., Mikelskis-Seifert, S., & Wodzinski, C. T. (2007). Physics in context- A program for improving physics instruction in Germany. In R. Pinto, & D. Cousa (Eds.) Contributions from science education research (pp. 119-130). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Efthimiou, C., Llewellyn, R., Maronde, D., & Winningham, T. (2006). Physics in films: An assessment. Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0609/0609154.pdf

Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physics work at university. Research Science Education, 37, 449-467.

Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2009). Talking physics during small-group work with context-rich problems analysed from an ownership perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 455-472.

Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA Science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884-96.

Finkelstein, N. (2005). Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1187–1209.

Fry, M., Dimeo, L., Wilson, C., Sadler, J., & Fawns, R. (2003). A new approach to teaching “energy and change”: using an abstract picture language to teach thermodynamic thinking in junior science classes. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 49(1), 36-43.

Harbach, A., & Fechner, S. (2011). Effects of context-based physics instruction on undergraduate students’ achievement for potential energy, kinetic energy, and rotational kinetic energy topics The ESERA 2011 Conference, ESERA ebook part 2, 45-51. Retrieved June 28, 2012, from http://lsg.ucy.ac.cy/esera/e_book/base/ebook/ebook-esera2011____Strand2.pdf

Hart, C. (1995). Access and the quality of learning: The story of a curriculum document for school physics. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Monash University.

Hart, C., & Boydell, S. (1988). VCE physics 1990-? Some background. Lab talk, 32(3), 32-33.

Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60, 637–644.

Heuvelen, A. V., Zou, X. (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 184-194.

Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education, 42, 143-169.

Huis, C. V., Berg, E. V. (1993). Teaching energy: A system approach. Physics Education, 28, 146-153.

Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2008). Is science a middle-class phenomenon? The SES determinants of 16–19 participation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education,13(2), 217-226.

Kaschalk, R. (2002). Physics—Why bother? . . . that’s why! Contextual Teaching Exchange, 1, 1–8.

King, C., & Kennett, P. (2002a). Earth science contexts for teaching physics. Part 1: Why teach physics in an Earth science context? Physics Education, 37(6), 467–469.

King, C., & Kennett, P. (2002b). Earth science contexts for teaching physics. Part 2: Contexts relating to teaching of energy, earth, and beyond and radioactivity. Physics Education, 37(6), 470-476.

King, C., & Kennett, P. (2002c). Earth science contexts for teaching physics. Part 3: Contexts relating to teaching of waves, forces and motion, electiricity and magnetism. Physics Education, 37(6), 478-484.

Kortland, J. (2005). Physics in personal, social and scientific contexts: A retrospective view on the Dutch Physics Curriculum Development Project PLON. In P. Nentwig, & D. Waddington (Eds.) Making it relevant. Context-based learning of science (pp. 67–89). Munchen, Germany: Waxmann.

Lawrenz, F., Wood, N. B., Kirchhoff, A., Kim, N. K., & Eisenkraft, A. (2009). Variables affecting physics achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 961-976.

Lye, H., Fry, M., & Hart, C. (2002). What does it mean to teach physics ‘in context’: A first case study. Australian Science Teachers, 48(1), 16-22.

Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental growth in students’ concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS Database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493-517.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Murphy, P., Lunn, S. & Jones, L. (2006). The impact of authentic learning on students’ engagement with physics. The Curriculum Journal, 17, 229–246.

Ng, W., & Nguyen, V. T. (2006). Investigating the integration of everyday phenomena and practical work in physics teaching in Vietnamese high schools. International Education Journal, 7(1), 36-50.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do: student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I), OECD Publishing. Retrieved May 7, 2012, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en

Park, J., & Lee, L. (2004). Analyzing cognitive and non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem-solving in an everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1577–1595.

Perkins, G. (2011). Impact of STS (Context-based type of teaching) in comparison with a textbook approach on attitudes and achievement in community college chemistry classrooms. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved June 28, 2012, from http://udini.proquest.com/view/impact-of-sts-context-based-type-of-pqid:2543395711/

Peşman, H., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2012). Approach-method interaction: The role of teaching method on the effect of context-based approach in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2127-2145.

Papadouris, N., Constantinou, C. P., & Kyratsi, T. (2008). Students’ use of the energy model to account for changes in physical systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 444-469.

Ramsden, J. M. (1997). How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 697-710.

Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teeach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

Rayner, A. (2005). Reflections on context based science teaching: A case study of physics students for physiotherapy. Poster presented at the annual UniServe Science Blended Learning Symp. Proc. Sydney, Australia, 169-172, 30 September 2005.

Redish, E. F., Steinberg, R. N. (1999). Teaching physics: Figuring out what works. Physics Today, 52, 24-30.

Rennie, L. J., & Parker, L. H. (1996). Placing physics problems in real-lifRennie, L. J., & Parker, L. H. (1996). Placing physics problems in real-life context: Students’ reactions and performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42, 55–59.

Rioseco, M. (1995). Context related curriculum planning for science teaching: A proposol to teach science around ozone problem. Science Education International, 6(4), 10-16.

Saleh, S. (2012). The effectiveness of brain-based teaching approach in dealing with the problems of students’ conceptual understanding and learning motivation towards physics. Educational Studies, 38(1), 19-29.

Schwartz-Bloom, R. D., & Halpin, M. J. (2003). Integrating Pharmacology Topics in High School Biology and Chemistry Classes Improves Performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 922-938.

Shieh, R. S., Chang, W., & Tang, J. (2010). The impact of implementing technology-enabled active learning (TEAL) in university physics in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 401-415.

Solbes, J., Guisasola, J., & Tarin, F. (2009). Teaching energy conservation as a unifying principle in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 265-274.

Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3, 155-167.

Tekbıyık, A., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2010). An investigation on the comparison of context based and traditional physics problems. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathmatics Education, 4(1), 123-140.

Testa, I., Lombardi, S., Monroy, G., & Sassi, E. (2011). An innovative context-based module to intruduce students to the optical properties of materials. Physics Education, 46(2), 167-177.

Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part one. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 343-354.

Trumper R. (1991).Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part two. International Journal of Science Education, 3, 1-10.

Waltner, C., Wiesner, H., & Rachel, A. (2007). Physics in context-a means to encourage student interest in physics. Physics Education, 42(5), 502-507.

Watts, M., Alsop, S., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1997). Eventcentred-learning: An approach to teaching science, technology and societal issues in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 341-351.

Whitelegg, E. (1996). The Supported Learning in Physics Project. Physics Education, 31, 291-296.

Whitelegg, E., & Parry, M. (1999). Real-life contexts for learning physics: meanings, issues and practice. Physics Education, 34(2), 68-72.

Wierstra, R. F., & Wubbels, T. (1994). Student perception and appraisal of the learning environment: Core concepts in the evaluation of the PLON physics curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 437–455.

Wilkinson, J. W. (1999). The contextual approach to teaching physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 43-50.

Williams, P. (2008). Assessing context-based learning: not only rigorous but also relevant. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 395-403.