Investigation of primary students’ opinions about using performance assessment in science and technology course with respect to the different variables

Airasian P.W. (2001). Classroom assessment: Concepts and application. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Adanalı, K. (2008). Alternative Assessment in Social Science: The Evaluation of Alternative Assessment Practices in 5th Grade Social Science Lessons. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Social science Institute of Çukurova University, Adana.

Algan, S. (2008). An Analysis on Measurement and Assessment of Social Studies Teaching Program of 6th and 7th Grade in Primary Schools in Terms of Opinions of The Teachers. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Social science Institute of Çukurova University, Adana.

Aslanoğlu, A.E. & Kutlu, Ö.,(2003) Öğretimde Sunu Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Dereceli Puanlama Anahtarı (Rubric) Kullanılmasına İlişkin Bir Araştırma, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, (1-2), 25-36.

Baron J. B. (1991). Performance assessment: Blurring the edges of assessment, curriculum, and instruction. In: Kulm G, Malcolm SM (eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 247-266.

Baykul, Y., (2000). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme: Klasik Test Teorisi ve Uygulaması, ÖSYM Yayınları, Ankara.

Birgin O. (2003). Investigation of the Application Level of a Computer Based Portfolio. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Science Institute of Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon

Birgin, O. & Baki, A. (2007). The Use of Portfolio to Assess Student’s Performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4, (2), 75-90.

Birgin, O. (2008). Students’ Views about the Application of Portfolio Assessment as an Alternative Assessment Method. Journal of Turkish Educational Science, 6(1), 1-24.

Bransford, J. D., (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Coffey, J. E., Sato, M. & Thıebault, M. (2005). Classroom Assessment Up Close – and personal. Teacher Development, 9(2), 169-184.

Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, Merrill Prentice Hall: New Jersey.

Çepni S, Ayas, A., Akdeniz, A.R, Özmen, H., Yiğit, N., & Ayvacı, H,.(2005) Kuramdan Uygulamaya Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi, Pegema Yayıncılık 4. Baskı.

Çepni, S. (2007). Assessment of performances. In. Karip, E. (Ed.), Measurement and Assessment. Pegema Publication, First Edition.

Çoklar, A.N., Vural, L., & Şahin, Y.L. (2009). Approaches in Measurement and Evaluatıon and Self-Effıcacy in the Use of Technology for Measurement and Evaluation for Pre-service Teachers. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Science, 2(3), 35-54.

Güven, B. & Eskitürk, M. (2007). Using Techniques and Methods of Primary Pre-Service Teachers in Measurement and Assessment. 16th National Educational Science Congress.

İşman, A. ( 2005). Measurement and Assessment in Turkish Educational Systems. Pegema Publication, First Edition.

Kan, A. (2007). Portfolio Assessment. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32, 133-144

Kanatlı, F. (2008). The Evaluation of Classroom Teachers' Opinions on the Alternative Techniques of Assessments and Measurements. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Social science Institute of Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay.

Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific Research Methods. Nobel Publication, 15th Edition.

Kim S. (2005). Effects of implementing performance assessment on student learning: Meta-analysis using Hlm. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.

Khattri, N., Reeve, A.L., & Kane, M.B. (1998). Principles and practices of performance assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide To Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.

Korkmaz, H. & Kaptan F., (2005) An Investigation on Using Electronic Portfolio for Assessing Students’ Development in Science Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educaton Technology, 4 (1), 13.

Kubıszyn, T. & Borıch, G. (1993). Educational Testing and Measurement: Classroom Application and Practice. HarperCollinsCollegePublishers, Fourth Edition.

Kutlu O, Dogan C, & Karakaya I. (2008). Öğrenci başarısının belirlenmesi performansa ve portfolyoya dayalı durum belirleme [Determination of Students’ achievement: performance and portfolio Based Assessment], Pegema Publication, First Edition Ankara.

Linn, R. L., & Baker. E. L. (1996). Can performance-based student assessments be psychometrically sound?, In J. B. Babon & D. P. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.

Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Logan, C. R., (1996). The Relationship Between İnstruction and Assessment, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA

Madaus, G. F. (1994). A technological and historical consideration of equity issues associated with proposals to change the nation’s testing policy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 76-91.

Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D. & McTighe, J. (2003). The changing face of educational assessment. www.ascd.org/publications/books/61193179/chapter1.html (Accessed: May 2007).

MNE (Ministry of National Education of Turkey) (2006). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6–8 sınıflar) öğretim programı[Elementary school science and technology curriculum (grades 6–8)], Ankara, Turkey.

Metin, M. (2008). Investigation of Performance Assessment’s Effect on Pre-Service Teachers, Contemporary education journal, 354, 28-35

Metin, M. & Demiryürek, G. (2009). Opinions of Turkish Teachers about Measurement- Assessment Approach of Renewed Turkish Education Programmes. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal Of Education, 28, 37-51.

Metin, M. & Özmen, H. (2009). Determination of Teachers’ In-Service Education (Inset) Needs on Performance Assessment: A sample from Artvin Provenience, Last Development on Science, Social and Environmental Education, Giresun University, Faculty of Education.

Metin M. (2010). Effectiveness of Preparing In-service Training programs for Science and Technology Teachers on Performance Assessment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Science Institute of Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.

Metin M. & Özmen, H. (2010). Determination of Science and Technology Teachers’ In-Service Education (Inset) Needs on Performance Assessment. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 18 (3), 819-838.

Metin, M. & Birişçi, S. (2010). Pre-Service Teachers’ Opinions on Effects of Performance - Based Assessment: A Sample of “Environmental Problem. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8 (3), 527-567.

Metin, M. (2011). The examinations of teachers’ attitude towards performance assessment with respect to the different variables. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(3): 269-284.

Metin, M. & Birişçi, S. (2011). Opinions of Primary Teachers in Different Branch about Alternative Assessment. Education and Science, 36(159), 140-153.

Metin, M. & Özmen, H. (2011) Investigating Opinions of Teachers about Performance Assessment Respect to the Gender and Branch Variables. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8 (4), 3-17.

Morgil, I., Cingör, N., Erökten, S., & Yavuz, S. (2004), Portfolio Application in Computer Based Chemistry Education. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 15.

Orhan, A. T. (2007). Exploring the Alternative Assessment Strategies by Considering Primary School Pre-Service Teachers’ and Students’ Dimensions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Educational Science Institute of Gazi University, Ankara.

Özmen, H., (2004). Learning theories and the constructivist learning supported with technology in science teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 14.

Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Pashley, P. J. (2000). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer.

Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford, & M. C. O’Connor. (Eds.), Changing assessments: alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (CSE Technical Report. No. 517). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Slater, T.F. (1996). The Effectiveness of Portfolio Assessments in Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(5), 315-318.

Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 200-214.

Yıldırım, A. (2006). Opinions about measurement and assessment in secondary schools (Samples of Diyarbakir and Elazığ), Unpublished Master Dissertation, Social science Institute of Elazığ University, Elazığ.

Zhang, L. Wilson, L. & Manon, J. (1999). An Analysis of Gender Differences on Performance Assessment in Mathematics--A Follow-Up Study. Eric Document: ED431791.