Development of a parent’s guide for the Singapore primary science curriculum: Empowering parents as facilitators of their children’s science learning outside the formal classrooms

Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91(1), 75–95.

Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Washington, D.C.: NAEYC. (DAP)

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.

Callanan, M. A., & Jipson, J. L. (2001). Explanatory conversations and young children’s developing scientific literacy. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. A. (1992). Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7, 213–233.

Chaille, C., & Britain, L., (1991). The Young Child as Scientist: A Constructivist Approach to Early Childhood Science Education. New York, N.Y.: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.

Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.

Crowley, K. & Callanan, M.A. (1998). Identifying and supporting shared scientific reasoning in parent-child interactions. Journal of Museum Education, 23, 12-17.

Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent – child activity. Science Education, 85, 712 – 732.

Crowley, K. & Galco, J. (2001). Everyday activity and the development of scientific thinking. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Curriculum Planning & Development Division Ministry of Education Singapore (2007). Science Syllabus Primary 2008.

de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W.R. (1998). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.

Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78, 57–72.

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact. Curator, 40, 211–218.

Foss, D. H., & Pinchback, C. L. (1998). An Interdisciplinary Approach to Science, Mathematics, and Reading: Learning as Children Learn. School Science and Mathematics, 98(3), 149-155.

Gauvain, M. (2001). The social context of cognitive development. New York: Guilford.

Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. Internal Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535- 549.

Glasersfeld, E. V. (1992). A constructivist's view of learning and teaching. In F. G. R. Duit, and H. Niedderer (Ed.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. (pp. 29-39). Kiel: IPN at the University of Kiel.

Gleason, M. E., & Schauble, L. (2000). Parents’ assistance of their children’s scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 343 – 378.

Gottfried, A., Fleming, J., & Gottfried, A. (1998) Role of Cognitively Stimulating Home Environment in Children’s Academic Intrinsic Motivation: A Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 69, 1448-1460.

Hall, A. (2007). Vygotsky Goes Online: Learning Design from a Socio-cultural Perspective. Learning and Socio-cultural Theory: Exploring Modern Vygotskian Perspectives International Workshop 2007, 1(1), 94-107.

Hall, R. L., & Schaverien, L. (2001). Families' engagement with young children's science and technology learning at home. Science Education, 85(4), 454-481.

Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87 – 112.

Jaramillo, J. (1996). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education, 117(1), 133-140.

John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3), 191- 206.

Jonassen. (1998). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories and models (2 ed., pp. 215-239). Mahwah, Erlbaum.

Lee, A. N. (2008). I-Science Parent’s Guide Primary 3 & 4. Panpac Education Private Limited, Singapore.

Lee, A. N. (2009). I-Science Parent’s Guide Primary 5 & 6. Panpac Education Private Limited, Singapore.

Martin, L. M. W. (2004). An Emerging Research Framework for Studying Informal Learning and Schools. Science Education, 8(S1), S71-S82.

Ng, E. H. (2010). Opening Address by Dr Ng Eng Hen, Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence, at the 5th Teachers' Conference 2010 on 6 September 2010 at 9.30am at the Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre, Suntec City.

Ostlund, K., Gennaro, E., & Dobbert, M. (1985). A Naturalistic Study of Children and their Parents in Family Courses in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(8), 723-741.

Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.

Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303-319.

Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 112-120.

Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. In J. H. Falk & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda (pp. 37-51). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.

Rowe, A. J. (2004). Creative Intelligence: discovering the innovative potential in ourselves and others. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Schauble, L., & Bartlett, K. (1997). Constructing a science gallery for children and families: The role of research in an innovative design process. Science Education, 81(6), 781-793.

Schauble, L., Beane, D. B., Coates, G. D., Martin, L., & Sterling, P. (1996). Outside the classroom walls: Learning in informal environments. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 5-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Scrimshaw, P. (1993). Language, Classrooms and Computers. London: Routledge.

Sefton-Green, J. (2003). Informal learning: substance or style? Teaching Education, 4(1), 37-52.

Shrager, J., & Callanan, M. (1991). Active language in the collaborative development of cooking skill. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Snow, C. E., & Kurland, B. (1996). Sticking to the point: Talk about magnets as a context for engaging in scientific discourse. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 189–220). Cambridge7 Cambridge University Press.

Szechter, L. E., & Carey, E. J. (2009). Gravitating toward science: Parent–child interactions at a gravitational-wave observatory. Science Education, 93(5), 846–858.

Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (2002). Young Children Learning (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.

Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

White, A. M. (1985). Teaching as though students mattered. In J. Katz(Ed.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 39-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Whiting, B., & Whiting, J. (1975). Children in six cultures. New Haven: Human Relations Area File Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.