Teaching for scientific literacy: Bangladeshi teachers’ perspectives, practices and challenges

Aikenhead, G. (2008, March). Scientific literacy: Expanding the research agenda. Paper presented at the Research Seminar, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Aikenhead, G., Barton, A. C., & Chinn, P. W. U. (2006). Toward a politics of place-based science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 403–416. doi: 10.1007/s11422-006-9015-z

American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Asia and the Pacific Programme of Educational Innovation for Development [APEID]. (1991). Values and ethics and the science and technology curriculum. Bangkok: Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

Asian Development Bank [ADB]. (1998). Impact evaluation study of the secondary science education projects in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan (Report No. IES: 98020). Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/documents/pers/ie-56.pdf

Babbie, E. (2011). The basics of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information and Statistics [BANBEIS]. (2006). Output statistics. Retrieved October 30, 2008, from BANBEIS, Government of Bangladesh http://www.banbeis.gov.bd/db_bb/out_sta.htm

Bybee, R., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357–387). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

Corrigan, D., & Gunstone, R. (2007). Values in science and mathematics education: Issues and tensions. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 133–148). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thosand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L

Fensham, P. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415–435.

Goodrum, D. (2004). Teaching strategies for science classrooms. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds.), The art of teaching science (pp. 54–72). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen&Unwin.

Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. J. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report (DETYA No. 6623DRED00A). Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/5DF3591E-DA7C-4CBD-A96C-CE404B552EB4/1546/sciencereport.pdf

Halstead, J. M. (1996). Values and values education in schools. In J. M. Halstead & M. J. Taylor (Eds.), Values in education and education in values (pp. 3–14). London: The Falmer Press.

Hare, W. (1979). Open-mindedness and education. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

Hare, W. (2009). What open-mindedness requires. Skeptical Inquirer, 33(2), 36–39.

Hildebrand, G. M. (2007). Diversity, values and the science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 45–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Hodson, D., & Reid, D. (1988a). Changing priorities in science education: Part I. School Science Review, 70(250), 101–108.

Hodson, D., & Reid, D. (1988b). Science for all. A curriculum developer's checklist. School Science Review, 69(249), 821–826.

Holbrook, J. (2005). Report on organizing the ROSE survey in Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/english/research/projects/rose/partners/bangladesh/report-bgd.pdf

Howes, E. (2001). Visions for "Science for All" in the elementary classroom. In A. C. Barton & M. D. Osborne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practice (pp. 129–158). New York: Peter Lang.

Iqbal, M. Z. (2010, August 02). Studying with laptop, Prothom Alo. Retrieved from http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2010-08-02/news/83257

Koballa, T. R. J., Kemp, A., & Evans, R. (1997). The spectrum of scientific literacy. The Science Teacher, 64(7), 27–31.

Law, N., Fensham, P., Li, S., & Wei, B. (2000). Public understanding of science as basic literacy. In R. Cross & P. Fensham (Eds.), Science and the citizen: For educators and the public (pp. 145–155). Fitzroy, Victoria: Arena Publications.

Layton, D., Davey, A., & Jenkins, E. (1986). Science for specific social purposes (SSSP): Perspectives on adult scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 13, 27–52.

Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Loughran, J. (1994). Developing reflection in pre-service teacher education students: Learning through modelling of teaching and learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/01/32/03/b2000.pdf

Ministry of Education. (2010). National Education Policy 2010 [in Bengali]. Retrieved from http://www.moedu.gov.bd/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=122&Itemid=426

Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successfull focus groups: Advancing the state of art (pp. 3–19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

National Curriculum and Textbook Board [NCTB]. (1995). Curriculum and syllabus: Junior secondary level (grades VI–VIII) [in Bengali].

National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Qualitative research and evaluation methods (pp. 339–427). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.

Rampal, A. (1994). Innovative science teaching in rural schools of India: Questioning social beliefs and superstitions. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 131–138). New York: Teachers College Press.

Rennie, L. J. (2007). Values in science in out-of-school contexts. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 197–212). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Rennie, L. J. (2011). Blurring the boundary between the classroom and the community: Challenges for teachers’ professional knowledge. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone & J. Dillon (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 13–29). Dordrecht: Springer.

Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Sarkar, M. (2009, November). An analytical frame to explore scientific literacy in intended curriculum: Bangladesh perspective. Paper presented at the International Science Education Conference: Science Education – Shared Issues Common Future, Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.nsse.nie.edu.sg/isec2009/downloads/

Sarkar, M. (2012). School science textbooks: A challenge for promoting scientific literacy in Bangladesh. In P. Chan (Ed.), Asia pacific education: Diversity, challenges and changes (pp. 150–165). Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.

Sarkar, M., & Gomes, J. J. (2010). Science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: The case of Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/

Siddique, M. N. A., & Rahman, S. M. H. (2007). Introducing open investigation in secondary science practical work: Prospects and challenges in the context of Bangladesh. Teacher's World Journal of Education and Research, 30–31, 19–33.

Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–17. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/

Solomon, J. (2001). Teaching for scientific literacy: What could it mean? School Science Review, 82(300), 93–96.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.

Tan, S. K. (1997). Moral values and science teaching: A Malaysian school curriculum initiative. Science & Education, 6(6), 555–572. doi: 10.1023/a:1008613709213

Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Clark, J. C. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/skills/resources/documents/openpathinscitechmathenginprimsecschtrans.doc

Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.