 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 13, Issue 1, Article 6 (Jun., 2012) |
Aktamış, H. & Ergin, Ö. (2007). Investigating the relationship between science process skills and scientific creativity. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 11-23.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford Press.
Arslan, A. & Tertemiz, N. (2004). Developing science process skills in elementary instruction. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2 (4), 479- 492.
Ash, D. (1993). The process skills of inquiry.Foundations, 2, 51- 62.
Bağcı Kılıç, G. (2003). Third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS): Science teaching, scientific research and nature of science. Elementary Education Online, 2 (1), 42- 51.
Bağcı Kılıç, G., Haymana, F. & Bozyılmaz, B. (2008). Analysis of the Elemantary Science and Technology Curriculum of Turkey with Respect to Different Aspects of Scientific Literacy and Scientific Process. Education and Science, 33 (50), 52-63.
Beaumont-Walters, Y. & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students' performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19 (2), 133-145.
Bilgin, I. (2006). The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students’ science process skills and attitudes toward science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1 (9), 27-37.
Bozdoğan, A. E., Taşdemir, T. & Demirbaş, M. (2006). The effect of cooperative learning method in science education on improving the students’ science process skills. İnönü University, Journal of Education Faculty, 7 (11), 23- 36.
Brotherton, P.N. & Preece, P. F.W. (1995). Science process skills: Their nature and interrelationships. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13 (1), 5- 11.
Bybee, R. (2000). Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel and E. H. Van Zee (eds), Washington, DC: American Association for the Advanvement of Science (AAAS).
Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005). A cross-age study on the understanding of chemical solution and their components. International Education Journal, 6 (1), 30- 41.
Campbell, R.L. (1979). A comparative study of the effectiveness of process skills instruction on reading comprehension of preservice and inservice elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 16, 123-127.
Chibeci, R. A. and Riley, J. P. (1986). Influence of students’ background and perceptions on science attitudes and achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 177-187.
Colley, K. E. (2006). Understanding ecology content knowledge and acquiring science process skills through project- based science instruction. Science Activities, 26-33.
Colley, K.E. (2006). Understanding ecology content knowledge and acquiring science process skills through project-based science instruction. ScienceActivities, 43 (1), 26-33.
Dawson, C., C., 1999. The Effect of Explicit Instruction in Science Process Skills on Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Photosynthesis, PhD Thesis, University of Northern Colorado.
Dori Y.J. & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: the value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 219–250.
Farsakoğlu, Ö. F., Şahin. Ç., Karslı, F., Akpınar, M. & Ültay, N. (2008). A study on awareness levels on prospective science teachers on science process skills in science education. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(2), 174-182.
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6 (1), 129-144.
Harrell, P. E & Bailer, J. (2004). Pass the mealworms, please: Using mealworms to develop science process skills. Science Activities, 41(2), 33-36.
Hotaman, D. (2008). The examination of the basic skill levels of the students’ in accordance with the perceptions of teachers, parents and students. International Journal of Instruction, 1(2), 39-55.
Huppert, J., Lomask, S.M. & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (8), 803-821.
Kanlı, U. & Yağbasan, R. (2008). The efficacy of the 7e learning cycle model based on laboratory approach on development of students’ science process skills. Gazi Üniversity, Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 28(1), 91-125.
Kanlı, U. (2007). The effects of a laboratory based on the 7e model wıth verification laboratory approach on students’ development of science process skills and conceptual achievement, PhD Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences.
Karahan, Z. (2006). With in the science and technology lesson, the effects of scientific process skills based learning on learning. Products ZKÜ Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Education Programs and Training, Thesis.
Karslı, (2011). The Effect of Enriched Laboratory Guide Materials on Improving Science Process Skills and Conceptual Change of Prospective Science Teachers, PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.
Karslı, F. & Şahin, Ç. (2009). Developing worksheet based on science process skills: Factors affecting solubility, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10, 1, 15.
Karslı, F., Şahin Ç. & Ayas, A. (2009). A study on science and technology course teachers’ ideas about the scientific process skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 890–895.
Kesamang, M. E. E. & Taiwo, A. A. (2002). The correlates of the socio-cultural background of botswana junior secondary school students with their attitudes towards and achievements in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 919-940.
Koray, Ö., Köksal, M. S., Özdemir, M. & Presley, A.İ. (2007). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on academic achievement and science process skills. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 377-389.
Lazarowitz, R. & Huppert, J. (1993). Science process skills of 10th-grade biology students in a computer-assisted learning setting. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25 (3), 367-382.
Lee, A.T., Hairston, R. V., Thames, R., Lawrence, T. & Herron, S. S. (2002). Using a computer simulation to teach science process skills to college biology and elementary education majors. Computer Simulations Bioscene, 28 (4), 35- 42.
McGregor, D. & Gunter, B. (2006). Invigorating pedagogic change. Suggestions from findings of the development of secondary science teachers’ practice and cognisance of the learning process, European Journal of Teacher Education, 29 (1), 23- 48.
Metin, M. & Birişçi, S. (2009). Effects of formative assessment on pre-service teachers’ developing science process skills and their opinions about assessment. Journal of Çağdaş Education, 34(370), 31-39.
Michail, S., Stamou, A. G. & Stamou, G. P. (2007). Greek primary school teachers’ understanding of current environmental ıssues: An exploration of their environmental knowledge and images of nature. Science Education, 91, 244-259.
Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MNE), (2006). Science and Technology Teaching Program for Elemetary Education 6, 7, and 8th grades. Ankara, MNE.
Monhardt, L. & Monhardt, R. (2006). Creating a context for the learning of science process skills through picture books. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34 (1), 67- 71.
Nicosia, A., M., L., Mineo, S., R., M. ve Valenza, M., A., 1984. The Relationship Between Science Process Abilities of Teachers and Science Achievement of Students: An Experimental Study, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 853-858.
Online Rapor International Study Center (2000). “TIMSS. 1999 (TIMSS-R) Released test Items” [Online] Retrieved on 10-February-2010, at URL: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss1999i/pdf/t99science_items.pdf.
Online Rapor National Research Council. (1996). “The national science standards”. [Online] Retrieved on 13-December- 2009 from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4962.
Papageorgiou, G. & Sakka, D. (2000). Primary school teachers’ views of fundamental chemical concepts. Chemistry Education: Research in Practice in Europe, 1(2), 237-247.
Parker, J. & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject knowledge and pedagogic content knowledge in primary teachers’ learning about forces, Intenational Journal of Science Education, 22 (1), 89- 111.
Psillos, D. & Kariotoglou, P. (1999). Teaching fluids: Intended knowledge and students’ actual conceptual evolution, International Journal of Science Education, 21 (1), 17–38.
Roberts, L. (2003). Creativity, Tech Directions, 63 (3).
Saat, R. M. (2004). The acquisition of integrated science process skills in a web-based learning environment. Research in Science & Technological Education, 22 (1),23- 40.
Şahin, Ç., İpek, H. & Ayas, A. (2008). Students’ understanding of light concepts primary school: A cross- age study. Asia Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9 (1), 7.
Saka, A., Cerrah, L., Akdeniz, A.R. & Ayas, A. (2006). Cross-age study of the understanding of three genetic concepts: How do they image the gene, DNA and chromosome? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15 (2), 193- 202.
Şener B. (2003). Data Analysis Handbook for social sciences. Extended Third Press, Ankara, Pegema Press..
Sinan, O. & Usak, M. (2011). Evaluating of prospective biology teachers’ scientific process skills, Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8, 15, 333-348.
Tan, M. & Temiz, B.K. (2003). The place and importance of scienceproces skills in science education, Pamukkale University Education Faculty Journal, 1(13), 89- 101.
Tatar, N. (2006). “The effect of inquiry-based learning approaches in the education of science in primary school on the science process skills., academic achivement and attitude.” PhD Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
Tatar, N., Korkmaz, H. & Şaşmaz Ören, F. (2007). Effective tools as a developing scientific process skills in inquiry-based science laboratories: Vee & I diagrams, Elementary Education Online, 6 (1), 76-92.
Taylor, N. & Lucas, K. B. (2000). Implementing and evaluating a sequence of instruction on gaseous pressure with pre-service primary school student teachers, Australian Science Teachers Journal, 46 (4), 9- 34.
Temiz, B.K. 2007. Assessing science process skills in physics teaching. PhD Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara.
URL-1, http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss1999i/science_achievement_report.html (TIMSS-R) International TIMSS, 1999 Science Report.13 February 2009.
URL-2, http://timss.bc.edu/TIMSS2007/sciencereport.html (TIMSS-R) International TIMSS, 2007 Science Report. 3 January 2009.
URL-3, 2009. http://earged.meb.gov.tr/pisa/dil/tr/sunum.html. 12 January 2009.
Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and it’s transformations during dissolving. Chemical Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 249-262.
Wilke, R. R. & Straits, W. J. (2005). Practical advice for teaching ınquiry-based science process skills in the biological sciences. The American Biology Teacher, 67(9), 534-540.
Wilke, R. R. & Straits, W. J. (2006). Developing students’ process skills in today’s science classroom. The Texas Science Teacher, 11-16.
Yvonne, B.W. & Kola, S. (2001). An analysis of high school students' performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19 (2), 133-145.
