 |
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 13, Issue 1, Foreword (Jun., 2012) John LOUGHRAN, Amanda BERRY, Rebecca COOPER, Stephen KEAST & Garry HOBAN Preservice teachers learning about teaching for conceptual change through slowmation
|
Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science: self-perceptions of primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 22(2), 11 - 19.
Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 393 - 410.
Berry, A., & Milroy, P. (2002). Changes that matter. In J. Loughran, I. Mitchell & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Learning from teacher research (pp. 196 - 221). New York: Teachers College Press.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts. Written Communication, 2, 166 - 194.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Chan, M. S., & Black, J. B. (2005). When can animation improve learning? Some implications for human computer interaction and learning. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Norfolk, VA
De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947 - 964.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5 - 12.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671 - 688.
Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (Eds.). (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London ; Bristol, Pa: Falmer Press.
Garbett, D. (2007). Science teacher education: Fostering confidence and competence. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.
Hallde´n, O. (1999). Contextual change and contextualisation. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 53 - 65). Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 68(S1), S52- S59.
Hand, B., & Choi, A. (2010). Examining the impact of student use of multiple modal representations in constructing arguments in organic chemistry laboratory classes. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 29 - 44.
Hoban, G. (2005). From claymation to slowmation: A teaching procedure to develop students' science understandings. Teaching Science: Australian Science Teachers Journal, 51(2), 26 - 30.
Hoban, G. (2007). Using slowmation to engage preservice elementary teachers in understanding science content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 1 - 9.
Hoban, G. (2009). Facilitating learner-generated animations with slowmation. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostino & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (pp. 313 - 330). Hershy, PA: IGI Global.
Hoban, G., Loughran, J., & Nielsen, W. (2011). Slowmation: Preservice elementary teachers presenting Science knowledge through creating multimodal digital animations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 985 - 1009.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Loughran, J. J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London: Routledge.
Loughran, J. J., & Northfield, J. R. (1996). Opening the classroom door: Teacher, researcher, learner. London: Falmer Press.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary school science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Olenick, R. P. (2008). Comprehensive conceptual curriculum for physics (C3P) project. http://phys.udallas.edu/C3P/Preconceptions.pdf .
Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject knowledge and pedagogic content knowledge in primary teachers' learning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 89 - 111.
Pringle, R. (2006). Preservice teachers’ exploration of children’s alternative conceptions: Cornerstone for planning to teach science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 291 - 307.
Russell, T., & Martin, A. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of science education (pp. 1151 - 1176). Philadelphia: Erlbaum.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions in conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31 - 56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Segall, A. (2002). Disturbing practice: Reading teacher education as text. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2005). Approaches to Biology teaching and learning: Understanding the wrong answers - teaching toward conceptual change. Cell Biology Education, 4, 112 - 117.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65 - 80.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 177 – 210). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Wenning, C. J. (2008). Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(1), 11 - 19.
Yore, L., & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: Plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency. Research in Science Education, 40, 93 - 101.
Copyright (C) 2012 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 13, Issue 1, Foreword (Jun., 2012). All Rights Reserved.
