Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,Volume 12, Issue 2, Article 11 (Dec., 2011)
Öznur KILIÇ and Ünsal UMDU TOPSAKAL
The effectiveness of using student and teacher centered analogies on the development of the students’ cognitive and affective skills

Previous Contents Next


Findings

The post-test results of the groups on which the student and teacher centered analogy technique are performed is given in the Table-1.

Table 1. Comparison of the Post-Test Results between Student and Teacher Centered Analogy Technique Classes


Group

N

Order Average

Order Total

U

p

Student   Centered

24

25.38

609

 

 

 

 

 

 

291

.857

Teacher Centered

25

24.64

616

 

 

It was found that there is not any significant difference between two groups. (U:291 p>.05). When the sequence averages are taken into consideration, it is understood that post test results of the students who were taught by means of using the student-centered analogy technique are higher than the students who were taught by means of using the teacher-centered analogy technique; however this difference was not at a significant level.

The comparison of the conceptual understanding levels after the application of the groups is given in the Table 2.

Table 2. Comparison of the Conceptual Understanding Levels between Student and Teacher Centered Analogy Technique Classes

Group

N

Order Average

Order Total

U

p

Student   Centered

24

31.65

759.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

140

.001

Teacher Centered

25

18.62

465.50

 

 

When the Table-2 is examined, it is found that there is no significant difference between the conceptual understanding results after the application of the groups. (U:140.5, p>.05). When the sequence averages are taken into consideration, it could be said that the conceptual understanding level results after the application are higher in the students who are taught by the student-centered analogy technique in comparison with the students who are taught by the teacher-centered analogy technique and the student-centered analogy technique is more effective in the learning process.

The comparison of the attitude scale results after the application is given for the groups in the Table-3.

Table 3. Comparison of the Attitude Toward Science Course Scale Results between Student and Teacher Centered Analogy Technique Classes

Group

n

Order Average

Order Total

U

p

Student   Centered

24

26.73

641.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

258.50

.405

Teacher Centered

25

23.34

538.50

 

 

When the Table-3 is examined, it is found that there is no significant difference between the attitude scale results of the groups after the application. (U:258.50, p>.05). When the sequence averages are taken into consideration, it is understood that post-test results of the students who are taught by means of using the student-centered analogy technique are higher than the students who are taught by means of using the teacher-centered analogy technique, but this difference is not at the significant level.

The influence of the gender factor on the influence of the analogy technique usage on the attitude is given in the Table-4.

Table 4. Gender Factor in the influence of the Analogy Technique Usage on the Attitude Toward Science Course

Group

n

Order Average

Order Total

U

p

Girl

29

29.31

850.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

165.00

.011

Boy

20

18.75

375.00

 

 

There is a significant difference between the attitude scale results and genders of the students on which the application is performed (U:165.00, p< .05). When the sequence averages are taken into consideration, it could be said that the attitude scale results of the female students are higher and the usage of the analogy technique positively influences the attitudes of the female students towards the course.

 


Copyright (C) 2011 HKIEd APFSLT.Volume 12, Issue 2, Article 11 (Dec., 2011). All Rights Reserved.