 |
Asia-Pacific Forum
on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 12, Issue 1, Article 6
(Jun., 2011) |
Ateş Ö. H. & Akdağ, Z. A. (2006) Fen ve teknoloji dersinde öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve bu sorunların nedenleri. VII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Özetler Kitabı, p. 33, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi.
Ayaş, A., Çepni, S., & Akdeniz, A. R. (1993). Development of the Turkish secondary science curriculum. Science Education, 77(4), 433-440.
Bilgin, İ. (2006). The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students' science process skills and attitudes towards science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1(9), 27-37.
Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on students’ outcomes: A qualitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499-518.
Bredderman, T. (1985). Laboratory programs for elementary school science: A meta analysis of effects of learning. Science Education, 69(4), 577-591.
Bristow, B. R. (2000). The effects of hands-on instruction on 6th grade students’ understanding of electricity and magnetism. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(01), 30A (UMI No. AAT 1400301).
Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107-123.
Coştu, B., Ünal, S., & Ayaş A. (2007). A hands-on activity to promote conceptual change about mixtures and chemical compunds. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 35-46.
Cunningham, J. & Herr N. (1994). Hands-on physics activities with real life applications. West Nyack, New York: The Center for Applied Research in Education
Doran, R. L. (1990). What research says … about assessment? Science and Children, 27(8), 26-27.
Erdoğan, M. (2007). Yeni geliştirilen dördüncü ve beşinci sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programının analizi; Nitel bir çalışma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 221-254.
Ewers, T. G. (2001). Teacher-directed versus learning cycles methods: effects on science process skills mastery and teacher efficacy among elementary education students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(07), 2387A (UMI No. AAT3022333).
Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationships among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357.
Glasson, G. E. (1989). The effects of hands-on teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 121-131.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
Haury, D. L. & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. Retrieved January 2, 2003 from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/eric/eric-toc.htm
Hein, G. E. (1987). The right test for hands-on learning. Science and Children, 25(2), 8-12.
Heller, P. M. & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study
in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 259-276.
Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 71(256), 33-40.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.
Jaus, H. H. (1977). Activity-oriented science: Is it really that good? Science and Children,14(7), 26-27.
Jodl, H., & Eckert, B. (1998). Low-cost, high-tech experiments for educational physics. Physics Education, 33(4), 226-235.
Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2009). Opinions of science teachers in primary schools related to Science and Technology Program. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 149-155.
Kyle, W. C., Bonnstetter, R. J., & Gadsten, T. (1988). An implementation study: an analysis of elementary students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward science in process-approach vs. traditional science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 103-120.
Laws, P. W. (1997). Workshop physics activity guide. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lebuffe, J. R. (1994). Hands-on science in the elementary school. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375003).
McDermott, L. C. (1996). Physics by Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
McGervey, J. D. (1995). Hands-on physics for less than a dollar per hand. Physics Teacher, 33(4), 238-241.
Morey, M. K. (1990). Status of science education in Illinois elementary schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 387-398.
U.S. National Science Education Standards (1995). National science education standards: An overview. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. Retrieved January 8, 2006 from http://books.nap.edu/html/nses/html/overview.html#organization
Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., & Birnie, H. H. (1985). Secondary school students’ beliefs about the physics laboratory. Science Education, 69(5), 649-663.
Rillero, P. (1994). Doing science with your children. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 952).
Schibeci, R. A., & Riley, J. P., Jr. (1986). Influence of students’ background and perceptions on science attitude and achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(3), 177-187.
Sencar, S. (2001). The effect of gender on different categories of ninth grade students’ misconceptions concerning simple electric circuits. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Shymansky, J. A. (1989). What research says about ESS, SCIS, and SAPA. Science and Children, 26(7), 33-35.
Shymansky J. A., Kyle, W. C., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387-404.
Simpson, R. D. & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69(4), 511-26.
Staver, J. R., & Small, L. (1990). Toward a clearer representation of the crisis in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), 79-89.
Stohr-Hunt, P. M. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 101-109.
Taşlıdere, E. (2002). The effect of conceptual approach on students’ achievement and attitudes toward physics. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421-431.
Turpin, T. J. (2000). A study of the effects of an integrated, activity-based science curriculum on student achievement, science process skills, and science attitudes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(11), 4329A (UMI No. AAT 9993727).
Ünal, S. (2008). Changing students’ misconceptions of floating and sinking using hands-on activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(3), 134-146.
Victor, E. & Kellough, R. D. (1997). Science for the elementary and middle school (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prantice Hall.
Weaver, G. C. (1998). Strategies in K-12 science instruction to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 82(4), 455-72.
Yager, R. E. & Yager, S. O. (1985). Changes in perceptions of science for third, seventh, and eleventh grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4), 347-358.
Yangın, S. & Dindar, H. (2007). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji programındaki değişimin öğretmenlere yansımaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 240-252.
