 |
Asia-Pacific Forum
on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 11, Issue 2, Article 4 (Dec., 2010) |
Ateş, S. (2008). Mekanik konularındaki kavramları anlama düzeyi ve problem çözme becerilerine cinsiyetin etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim (Education and Science), 33(148), 3-12.
Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 3–27.
Beaton, A.E., Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Gonzales, E.J., Smith, T.A., & Kelly, D.L. (1996). Science achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International TIMSS. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Carr, M., Jessup, D.L., & Fuller, D. (1999). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Parent and teacher contributions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 20-46.
Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., Blickenstaff, J., & Walker, N. (2003). Learning, reasoning, motivation, and epistemological beliefs. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33, 18-23.
Cekolin, C.S. (2001). The effect of self-regulated learning strategy instruction on strategy use and academic achievement. Retrieved April 20, 2008 from http.//www.southalabama.edu/coe/bset/idd/dis/cekolin.htm.
Chambers, S.K, & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107-123.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th edition). New York: Routledge.
Dermitzaki, I., Andreou, G., & Paraskeva, V. (2008). High and low reading comprehension achievers’ strategic behavior and its relation to performance in a reading comprehension situation. Reading Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 471-492.
Diaz, A. L. (2003). Personal, family, and academic factors affecting low achievement in secondary school. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology and Psycho Pedagogy, 1(1), 43-66.
Farenga, S.J. ve Joyce, B.A. (1997). What children bring to the classroom: Learning science from experience. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 248‐252.
Goh, C. C. M., & Foong, K. P. (1997). Chinese ESL students' learning strategies a look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 39-53.
Green, J.M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
Jones, M.G., Hove, A., & Rua, M.J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interest, and attitudes toward science and scientist. Science Education, 84, 180‐192.
Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131–140.
Kahle, J.B., Parker, L.H., Rennie, L.J., & Riley, D. (1993). Gender differences in science education: Building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28(4), 379-404.
Kahle, J.B, & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issue in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (eds). Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 542‐558). New York, USA: Macmillan.
Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758-768.
Koch, A., & Eckstein, S. G. (1991). Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students’ question formulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 473-486.
Kost, L. E., Pollock, S. J. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009). Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 010101.
Kost-Smith, L.E., Pollock, S. J. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a “smog of bias.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020112.
Najar, R.L. (1999). Patways to success: Learning strategy instruction and content curriculum. HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, 12-15 July 1999.
Park, G. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 211-221.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Kost, L. E. (2007). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom: How sufficient is interactive engagement? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010107.
Reap, M. A., & Cavallo, A. L. (1992). Students' meaningful understanding of science concepts: Gender differences. Paper presented at a poster session at the annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
Rouet, J. F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A. B., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 163-186.
Sağlam, M. (2010). Students’ performance awareness, motivational orientations and learning strategies in a problem-based electromagnetism course. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), Article 16.
Sezgin Selçuk, G., Çalışkan, S., & Erol, M. (2006). Learning strategies of physics teacher candidates: Relationships with physics achievement and class level. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference of the Balkan Physical Union, pp. 511-512.
Sezgin Selçuk, G. (2004). The effects of strategy teaching on physics achievement, attitude, achievement motivation and strategy use(in Turkish). PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey.
Sezgin Selçuk, G. & Çalışkan, S. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının fizikte öğrenme stratejilerini kullanımları: cinsiyet ve anabilim dalının etkileri (in Turkish). IX. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 23-25 Eylül 2010, İzmir, Türkiye.
Sheorey, R. (1999). An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System, 27, 173-190.
Shin, H., Jeon, W. T., & Yang, E. B. (2010). Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement in medical college and graduate medical school students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(3), 197-204.
Stadler, H., Duit, R., & Benke, G. (2000). Do boys and girls understand physics differently? Physics Education, 35(6), 417–422.
Thiessen, V., & Blasius, J. (2008). Mathematics achievement and mathematics learning strategies: cognitive competencies and construct differentiation. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 362-371.
Wee, A. TS, Baacquie, B.E., & Huan, A.CH. (1993). Gender differences in undergraduate physics examination performance and learning strategies in Singapore. Physics Education, 28(3), 158-163.
Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: MacMillan.
Vaidya, S. R. (1999). Metacognitive learning strategies for students with learning disabilities. Education, 120(1), 186–190.
Yumuşak, N., Sungur, S. and Çakıroğlu, J. (2007). Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 53-69.
