 |
Asia-Pacific Forum
on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 11, Issue 2, Article 5 (Dec., 2010) |
Abraham, M.R., Gryzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, A.E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105120.
Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen Öğrenimi ve Öğretimi (Science learning and teaching). Asil Publication Distribution, Ankara. [in Turkish].
Ayas, A., Yılmaz, M. & Tekin, S. (2001). Öğretmen adaylarına radyoaktivite konusunun bilgisayar destekli öğretim yolu ile sunularak anlamlı öğrenmeye katkısının değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of contribution on learning of presenting the radioactivity topic with computer supported teaching way to student teachers). Yeni Binyılın Başında Türkiye’de Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı (Science Education Symposium in Turkey at the Beginning of the New Millennium Announcement Book) 431-435, Maltepe University, Istanbul. [in Turkish].
Aypay, A., Erdoğan, M. & Sözer, M.A. (2007). Variation among schools on classroom practices in science based on TIMSS-1999 in Turkey. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1417-1435.
Başer, M. & Çataloğlu, E. (2005). Effect of conceptual change oriented instruction on remediation of students’ misconceptions related to heat and temperature concepts. H.U. Journal of Education, 29, 43-52.
Besson, U. & Viennot, L. (2004). Using models at the mesoscopic scale in teaching physics: Two experimental interventions in solid friction and fluid statics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1083-1110.
Bodner, G.M. (1990). Why good teaching fails and hard-working students do not always succeed. Spectrum, 28(1), 27-32.
Çalık, M., (2006). Devising and implementing guide materials related to solution chemistry topic in grade 9 based on constructivist learning theory. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2010). Investigating the effectiveness of teaching methods based on a four-step constructivist strategy. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 19, 32-48.
Cardak, O. & Dikmenli, M. (2008). Reducing students’ alternative conceptions on the reproduction and development in living things by means of conceptual teaching. Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 98-102.
Cardak, O., Dikmenli, M. & Saritas, O. (2008). Effect of 5E instructional model in student success in primary school 6th year circulatory system topic. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 10.
Carlton, K. (1999). Teaching electric current and electrical potential. Physics Education, 34(6), 341-345.
Çaycı, B. (2007). Kavram değiştirme metinlerinin kavram öğrenimi üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi (The effect of conceptual change texts on the concept learning). Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 87-102. [in Turkish].
Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (Introduction to the research and project works). Extented 3th Edition, Celepler Typography, Trabzon. [in Turkish].
Çepni, S. (Ed), Ayas, A, Akdeniz, A.R., Özmen, H., Yiğit, N. & Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2007). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi (Teaching Science and Technology from Theory to Practice. Pegema Publishing, Ankara. [in Turkish].
Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A.R. & Keser, Ö.F. (2000, Eylül). Fen bilimleri öğretiminde bütünleştirici öğrenme kuramına uygun örnek rehber materyallerin geliştirilmesi (Developing the example of guided materials based on constructivist learning theory for science teaching). Fırat University, 19th Physic Congress, Elazığ. [in Turkish].
Çepni, S., Taş, E. & Köse, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students' cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education, 46(2), 192-205.
Çetingül, P.İ & Geban, Ö. (2005). Understanding of acid-base concept by using conceptual change approach. H.U. Journal of Education, 29, 69-74.
Chambers, S.K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107-123.
Clark, C. (2005). Innovative Strategy: Concept Cartoons. <http://www.southalabama.edu/coe/bset/dempsey/isd613/stuproj/summer00is/caryclark.pdf> (accessed December 2).
Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education. Routeledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Duit, R. & Treagust, F.D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
Er Nas, S. (2008). Determining effectiveness of the materials about “the ways of spread of heat” based on the elaborate stage of the 5E model. Master Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Fisher, K.M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62.
Gearhart, M., Nagashima, S., Pfotenhauer, J., Clark, S., Schwab, C., Vendlinski, T., Osmundson, E., Herman, J. & Bernbaum, D.J. (2006). Developing expertise with classroom assessment in K-12 science: Learning to interpret student work. Interim findings from a 2- year study. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 237-263.
Grotzer, T.A. (2003, March). Transferring structural knowledge about the nature of causality: an emprical test of tree levels of transfer. Paper presented at the national association of research in science teaching (NARST) conferance, Philadelphia.
Gürdal, A. & Macaroğlu, E. (1997). Çocuğun zihinsel gelişim düzeyine göre “yüzme” ve “batma” kavramlarının öğretilmesi (Teaching floating and sinking concepts according to the level of childs’ mental development). Marmara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10-13. [in Turkish].
Haidar, A.H. & Abraham, M.R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concept based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938.
Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K. & Stern, E. (2006). Effect of instructional support within construvtivist learning environments for elemantary school students’ understanding of floating and sinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307-326.
Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young childrens’ conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259-279.
&Korfiatis, K.J. (2006). Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual change in science education. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 416-432
İpek, H. & Çalık, M. (2008). Combining different conceptual change methods within four-step constructivist teaching: A sample teaching of series and parallel circuits. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(3), 143-153
Joung, Y.J. (2009). Children's typically-perceived-situations of floating and sinking. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 101-127.
Kabapınar, F. (2005). Effectiveness of teaching via concept cartoons from the point of view of constructivist approach. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(1), 135-146.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C., Noh, T. & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037-1058.
Karslı, F. & Şahin, Ç. (2009). Developing and applying work sheet based on science process skills about factors effecting solubility topic. Asia Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(3).
Kawasaki, K., Rupert Herrenkohl, L. & Yeary, S.A. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students’ developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299-1324.
Keleş, E. & Çepni, S. (2006). Turkish students' conceptions about the simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 269-291.
Keogh, B. & Naylor, S. (1999a). Science goes underground. Adults Learning, 10(5), 3-6.
Keogh, B. & Naylor, S. (1999b). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: an evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-446.
Keogh, B., Naylor, S. & Downing, B. (2003). Children’s interactions in the classroom: argumentation in primary science. <www1.phys.uu.nl/esera2003/programme7pdf%5C179S.pdf,> (accessed December 10, 2005).
Köseoğlu, F., Tümay, H. & Kavak, N. (2002, Eylül). Yapılandırıcı öğrenme teorisine dayanan etkili bir öğretim yöntemi-tahmin et-gözle-açıkla- “buz ile su kaynatılabilir mi?” (POE an effective teaching method based on the constructivist theory “can ice will be boiled with water?”. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (V. National Science and Mathematic Education Congress Announcement Book), 638-645, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. [in Turkish].
Krantz, P.D. (2004). Inquiry, slime and the national standards. Science Activities, 41(3), 22-25.
Kurnaz, M.A. & Çalık, M. (2008). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within the 5e model: A sample teaching for heat and temperature. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(1), 3-6.
Macaroğlu Akgül, E. & Şentürk, K. (2001, Eylül). Çocukta “yüzme ve batma” kavramlarının gelişimi (Developing of the child’s “floating and sinking” concepts). Yeni Binyılın Başında Türkiye’de Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı (Science Education Symposium in Turkey at the Beginning of the New Millennium Announcement Book), 505–508, Maltepe University, Istanbul. [in Turkish].
Marek, E.A. (1986). They misunderstand, but they’ll pass. The Science Teacher, 32-35.
McGregor, D. & Gunter, B. (2006). Invigorating pedagogic change. Suggestions from findings of the development of secondary science teachers’ practice and cognisance of the learning process. European Journal of Teacher Education, 29(1), 23-48.
Moore, T. & Harrison, A. (2007). Floating and sinking: Everyday science in middle school. 1-14. http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/moo04323.pdf, (accessed December 9, 2007).
Önen, F. (2005). The removing of students' misconceptions about pressure with constructivist approach in elementary school. Master Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Education Science, İstanbul, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Orgill, M-K. & Thomas, M. (2007). Analogies and the 5E model. The Science Teacher, 74(1), 40-45.
Özdamar, K. (2004). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi 1 (Statistical data analysis 1 with package programs). Extented 5th Edition, Kaan Bookstore, 622-637, Eskişehir. [in Turkish].
Özmen, H., Demircioğlu, H. & Demircioğlu, G. (2009). The effects of conceptual change texts accompanied with animations on overcoming 11th grade students’ alternative conceptions of chemical bonding. Computers & Education, 52, 681-695.
Özsevgeç, T. & Çepni, S. (2006). Farklı sınıflardaki öğrencilerin yüzme ve batma kavramlarını anlama düzeyleri (Different grade students understanding level of floating and sinking concepts). Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 172, 297-311. [in Turkish].
Özsevgeç, T. (2006). Kuvvet ve hareket ünitesine yönelik 5E modeli’ne göre geliştirilen öğrenci rehber materyalinin etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi (Determining Effectiveness of Student Guiding Material Based On the 5E Model in “Force and Motion” Unit). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(2), 36-48. [in Turkish].
Özsevgeç, T. (2007). Determining effectiveness of guided materials about force and motion unit based on the 5E model for elementary students. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Parker, J. & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject knwledge and pedagogic content knowledge in primary teachers’ learning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 89-111.
Pınarbaşı, T., Canpolat, N., Bayrakçeken, S. & Geban, Ö. (2006). An investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students’ understanding of solution concepts. Research in Science Education, 36, 313-335.
Raghavan, K., Sartoris, M.L. & Glaser, R. (1998). Why does it go up? The impact of the MARS curriculum as revealed through changes in student explanations of a helium balloon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 547-567.
Reid, D.J., Zhang, J. & Chen, Q. (2003). Supporting for scientific discovery learning in simulation environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 9-20.
Rowell, J.A. & Dawson, C.J. (1977). Teaching about floating and sinking: an attempt to link cognitive psychology with classroom practice. Science Education, 61(2), 245-253.
Şahin, Ç. (2010). Design, implementation and evaluation of the guided materials based on the “enriched 5e instructional model” for the elementary 8th grade "force and motion" unit. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Sahin, Ç., Calik, M. & Cepni, S. (2009). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5e model: A sample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 1(3), 115-125.
Saka, A. (2006). The effect of 5E model on removing science student teachers' misconceptions about genetics. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Sere, M.G. (1982). A study of some frameworks used by pupils aged 11 to 13 years in the interpretation of air pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 299-309.
Sevim, S. (2007). Preparation and application of conceptual change texts on solution and chemical bonding concepts. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
She, H.C. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: a study of air pressure and buoyancy. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 981-996.
She, H.C. (2005). Promoting students’ learning of air pressure concepts: the interrelationship of teaching approaches and student learning characteristics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 29-51.
Sinclair, K.J., Renshaw, C.E. & Taylor, H.A. (2004). Improving computer assisted instruction in teaching higer order skills. Computers & Education. 42(2), 169-180.
Snir, J. (1991). Sink or float- what do the experts think? The historical development development of explanations for floatation. Science Education, 75(5), 595-609.
Stephenson, P. & Warwick, P. (2002). Using concept cartoons to support progression in students’ understanding of light. Physics Education. 37(2), 135-141.
Strauss, S., Globerson, T. & Mintz, R. (1983). The influence of training for the atomistic schema on the development of the density concept among gifted and nongifted children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4, 125-147.
Taş, E. (2006). Developing, implementing and evaluating of a WEB designed science material. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey. [in Turkish].
Taştan, İ., Dikmenli, M. & Çardak, O. (2008). Effectiveness of the conceptual change texts accompanied by concept maps about students’ understanding of the molecules carrying genetical information. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 11.
Thorley, N.R. (1990). The role of the conceptual change model in the interpretation of classroom interactions. Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Madison in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, August.
Türk, F. & Çalık, M. (2008). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5e model: A sample teaching of endothermic-exothermic reactions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1-10.
Tytler, R. (1998). Childrens’ conceptions of air pressure: Exploring the nature of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 929-958.
Ünal, S., & Coştu, B. (2005). Problematic issue for students: Does it sink or float? Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1.
Ürey, M. & Çalık, M. (2008). Combining different conceptual change methods within 5E model: A Sample teaching design of ‘cell’ concept and its organelles. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 1-15.
URL- 1, (2005). Concept Cartoons. <http://ghost.rider.edu/cii//presen/ccart.ppt#1> (accessed December).
Uzuntiryaki, E. & Geban, Ö. (2005). Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts. Instructional Science, 33, 311-339.
Vincent, D., Cassel, D. & Milligan, J. (2008). Will it float?: A learning cycle investigation of mass and volume. Science and Children, 45(6), 36-39.
White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. Burgess Science Press, Basingstoke.
Wilder, M. & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). Cell inquiry: A 5E learning cycle lesson. Science Activities, 41(4), 37-43.
Yenilmez, A. & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Enhancing students’ understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plant through conceptual change approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 81-87.
Yiğit, N. & Akdeniz, A. (2003). The effect of computer-assisted activities on student achievement in physics course: Electric circuits sample. Gazi University, Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 23(3), 99-113. [in Turkish].
Yılmaz, M. & Saka, A.Z. (2005). Bilgisayar destekli fizik öğretiminde çalışma yapraklarına dayalı materyal geliştirme ve uygulama (Material development and application based on worksheets in computer assisted physics teaching). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 120-131. [in Turkish].
Yin, Y., Tomita, M.K. & Shavelson, R.J. (2008). Diagnosing and dealing with student misconceptions: floating and sinking. Science Scope, 31(8), 34-39.
Yürük, N. (2007). The effect of supplementing instruction with conceptual change texts on students’ conceptions of electrochemical cells. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(6), 515-523.
Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Sun, Y. & Reid, D.J. (2004). Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: Experimental research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 269-282.
