 |
亞太科學教育論壇，第十一期，第一冊，文章三(二零一零年六月)
蘇詠梅、鍾媚 科學探究中的“不科學”
|
| |
亞太科學教育論壇，第十一期，第一冊，文章三(二零一零年六月)
蘇詠梅、鍾媚 科學探究中的“不科學”
|
Chin, C., Brown, D., & Bruce, B. (2002). Student-generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigation: what questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269-287.
Chin, C., & Brewer, W. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19(3), 323-393.
Chin, C. (2003). Success with investigations. The Science Teacher, 2(70), 34-40.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.
Duschl, R. A. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research. Buckingham (pp. 187-206), UK: Open University Press.
Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2000). Understanding evidence in investigations: The way to a more relevant curriculum? In J. Sears & P. Sorensen (Eds.), Issues in science teaching (pp. 60-69). London: Routledge Falmer.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (2003). Understanding and using scientific evidence: How to critically evaluate data. London: SAGE Publications.
Giere, R. (1991). Understanding scientific reasoning. Fort Worth, Tex. : Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Kanari, Z., & Millar, R. (2004). Reasoning from data: how students collect and interpret data in science investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 748-769.
Harlen, W. (2000). The teaching of science in primary schools (3rd ed.). London: David Fulton.
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiment? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7(7), 655-675.
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this reality what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. Wellington (Eds.), Practical work in school science: which way now (pp. 93-108). London: Routledge.
Kuhn, D. (1992).Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-178.
Leach, J. (1998). Teaching about the world of science in the laboratory: The influence of students’ ideas. In J. Wellington (Eds.), Practical work in school science: which way now (pp. 52-68). London: Routledge.
Lubben, F., & Millar, R. (1996). Children’s ideas about the reliability of experimental data. Internaltional Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 955-968.
Millar, R. (1989). What is ‘scientific method’ and can it be taught? In J. Wellington (Eds.), Skills and processes in science education: a critical analysis (pp. 47-62). London: Routledge.
Osborne, J.,Erduran, S.Simon, S., & Monk, M.(2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Rop, C. F. (2002). The meaning of student inquiry questions: a teacher beliefs and responses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 717-736.
Watson, R., Goldsworthy, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (2000). SC1：Beyond the fair test. In J. Sears, & P. Sorensen (Eds.), Issues in Science Teaching (pp. 70-79). London: Routledge Falmer.
Copyright (C) 2010 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 11, Issue 1, Article 3 (Jun., 2010). All Rights Reserved.
