 |
Asia-Pacific Forum
on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article 3 (Dec., 2009) |
Bodner, G., Klobuchar, M., & Geelen, D. (2001). The many forms constructivism [Electronic version]. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1107.
Chabay, R. W. & Sherwood, B. A. (2008). Computational physics in the introductory calculus-based course. American Journal of Physics, 76, 307. [Online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2835054.
Chabay, R. W. & Sherwood, B. A. (2002). Vol I: Matter and interactions: Modern mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chabay, R. W. & Sherwood, B. A. (1999). Bringing atoms into first-year physics [Electronic version]. American Journal of Physics, 67, 1045-1050.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorizations and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
Churukian, A. D. (2002). Interactive engagement in an introductory university physics course: Learning gains and perceptions (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1685.
Czudkovà, L. & Musilovà, J. (2000). The pendulum: A stumbling block of secondary school mechanics. Physics Education, 35, 428-435.
diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemological physics. [Electronic version]. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
Galloway, C. M. (2001). Vygotsky's Constructionism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, amd technology. Retrieved December 11, 2009 from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/.
Greca, I. M. & Moreira, M. A. (2002). Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics [Electronic version]. Science Education, 1, 106-121.
Foster, T. M. (2000). The development of students' problem-solving skill from instruction emphasizing qualitative problem-solving (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Minnesota, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 1729.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses [Electronic version]. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
Hayes, R. J. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60, 627-636.
Henderson, C. R (2002). Faculty conceptions about the teaching and learning of problem-solving in introductory calculus-based physics (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Minnesota, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1772.
Hoover, W. A. (1996). The practice implications of constructivism. SEDLetter. Adapted from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/sedletter/v09n03/welcome.html.
Hsu, L., Brewe, E., Foster, T. M., & Harper, K. A. (2004). Resource letter RPS-1: Research in problem solving [Electronic version]. American Journal of Physics, 72, 1147-1156.
Larkin, J. H. (1979). Processing information for effective problem solving. Engineering Education, 285-288.
Larkin, J. H. & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem-solving in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 191-203.
Larkin, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 75-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larkin, J. H. (1980). Skilled problem solving in physics: A hierarchical planning model. Journal of Structured Learning, 1, 271-297.
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
Maloney, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving: Physics. In D. L. Gabel(Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.327-356). New York:Macmillan.
Ornek, F. (2008). Models in science education: Applications of models in learning and teaching science. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(2), 35 – 45
Ornek, F. (2007). Evaluation novelty in modeling-based and interactive engagement instruction [Electronic version]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 3, 231-237.
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). Students’ expectations about an innovative introductory physics course, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), 48-58.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Philipps, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, 5-12.
Reif, F. & Heller, J. I. (1982). Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics. Educational Psychologist, 17, 102-127.
Scherer, D., Dubois, P., & Sherwood, B. (2000). VPython: 3D interactive scientific graphics for students. Computing in Science and Engineering, 82-88.
Schoenfield, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Schultz, K., & Lockhead, J. (1991). Aview from physics. In M. U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving: views from the content domains (pp.99-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stromnen, E. F. (1992). Constructivism, technology, and the future of classroom learning. Retrieved December 11, 2009 from http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/ilt/papers/construct.html.
Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A view of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59, 891-897.
Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Overview, case study physics. American Journal of Physics, 59, 898-907.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
